Oil & Gas Integrated
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SHEL vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Drilling
SHEL vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Integrated | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $241.02B | $1.28B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $266.82B | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $18.71B | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 15.6% | -61.2% |
| Operating Margin | 10.2% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | 8.6x | 7.9x |
| Total Debt | $104.58B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30.22B | $98M |
SHEL vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shell plc (SHEL) | 100 | 220.9 | +120.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHEL vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHEL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.14, yield 3.4%
- 126.6% 10Y total return vs SOC's 32.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.14, Low D/E 59.6%, current ratio 1.30x
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs SHEL's -6.1%
- Lower P/E (7.9x vs 8.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.5% revenue growth vs SHEL's -6.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.9x vs 8.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.0% margin vs SOC's -391.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.14 vs SOC's 1.42 | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.4% vs SOC's -38.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 8.8% vs -44.6% |
SHEL vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SHEL vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEL is the larger business by revenue, generating $266.8B annually — 209926.7x SOC's $1M. SHEL is the more profitable business, keeping 7.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $266.8B | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50.1B | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $18.7B | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18.8B | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.6% | -61.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +7.0% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +0.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +33.3% | -5.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SOC leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $241.0B | $1.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $315.4B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.95x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 8.63x | 7.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.34x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.42x | 2.36x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.05x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHEL leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHEL delivers a 10.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SHEL scores 5/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.5% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.9% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.8% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.5% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $74.4B | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30.2B | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $104.6B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 6.83x | -3.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHEL leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHEL five years ago would be worth $24,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,275 for SOC. Over the past 12 months, SHEL leads with a +33.4% total return vs SOC's -38.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHEL at 14.9% vs SOC's 8.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.3% | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.4% | -38.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +51.5% | +26.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +140.0% | +32.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +126.6% | +32.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.9% | +8.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEL is the less volatile stock with a 0.14 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEL currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.14x | 1.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $94.90 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $64.89 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.5% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.8 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 8.1M | 5.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SHEL as "Buy" and SOC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 117.9% upside for SOC (target: $28) vs 12.8% for SHEL (target: $95). SHEL is the only dividend payer here at 3.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $94.67 | $28.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.85 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.3% | 0.0% |
SHEL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SOC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SHEL vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHEL or SOC a better buy right now?
Shell plc (SHEL) offers the better valuation at 13.
9x trailing P/E (8. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shell plc (SHEL) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHEL or SOC?
On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp.
is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHEL or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Shell plc (SHEL) delivered a total return of +140.
0%, compared to +32. 7% for Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEL returned +126. 6% versus SOC's +32. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHEL or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shell plc (SHEL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
14β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 42β — meaning SOC is approximately 911% more volatile than SHEL relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SHEL or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to 19. 0% for Shell plc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHEL or SOC?
Shell plc (SHEL) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
7% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHEL leads at 10. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHEL leads at 15. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHEL or SOC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 8. 6x for Shell plc — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 117. 9% to $28. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHEL or SOC?
In this comparison, SHEL (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SHEL or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shell plc (SHEL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
14), 3. 4% yield, +126. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEL: +126. 6%, SOC: +32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHEL and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHEL is a large-cap deep-value stock; SOC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. SHEL pays a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.