Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$898M
5Y Perf.-67.5%
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.71B
5Y Perf.-38.9%
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.64B
5Y Perf.+52.4%
ATUS
Altice USA, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$539M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$20.29B
5Y Perf.-76.9%

SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SHEN logoSHEN
LUMN logoLUMN
FYBR logoFYBR
ATUS logoATUS
CHTR logoCHTR
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$898M$8.71B$9.64B$539M$20.29B
Revenue (TTM)$266M$12.12B$6.11B$8.59B$54.64B
Net Income (TTM)$-36M$-1.74B$-381M$-1.87B$5.13B
Gross Margin37.9%35.2%65.1%51.6%43.3%
Operating Margin-10.3%-2.6%5.3%-1.3%24.1%
Forward P/E3.8x
Total Debt$642M$17.71B$12.03B$250M$97.12B
Cash & Equiv.$27M$1.00B$806M$1.01B$477M

SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SHEN
LUMN
FYBR
ATUS
CHTR
StockMay 21May 26Return
Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN)10032.5-67.5%
Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN)10061.1-38.9%
Frontier Communicat… (FYBR)100152.4+52.4%
Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS)1004.6-95.4%
Charter Communicati… (CHTR)10023.1-76.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SHEN and CHTR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Charter Communications, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. LUMN, FYBR, and ATUS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHEN
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company
The Income Pick

SHEN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
  • Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
  • Beta 0.89, yield 0.7%, current ratio 0.90x
  • 9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
LUMN
Lumen Technologies, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

LUMN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +100.0% vs CHTR's -60.4%
Best for: momentum
FYBR
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FYBR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 42.8% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.06, current ratio 0.55x
  • Beta 0.06 vs LUMN's 2.74
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
ATUS
Altice USA, Inc.
The Value Play

ATUS is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Better valuation composite
Best for: value
CHTR
Charter Communications, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

CHTR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 9.4% margin vs ATUS's -21.8%
  • 3.3% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.8%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSHEN logoSHEN9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
ValueATUS logoATUSBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsCHTR logoCHTR9.4% margin vs ATUS's -21.8%
Stability / SafetyFYBR logoFYBRBeta 0.06 vs LUMN's 2.74
DividendsSHEN logoSHEN0.7% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs LUMN's 0.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)LUMN logoLUMN+100.0% vs CHTR's -60.4%
Efficiency (ROA)CHTR logoCHTR3.3% ROA vs ATUS's -156.2%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.8%

SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SHENShenandoah Telecommunications Company
FY 2025
Service
100.0%$351M
LUMNLumen Technologies, Inc.
FY 2025
Business Segment
79.8%$9.9B
Mass Market Segment
20.2%$2.5B
FYBRFrontier Communications Parent, Inc.
FY 2024
Data And Internet Services
67.5%$4.0B
Voice Services
21.0%$1.2B
Video Services
5.9%$344M
Other Customer Revenues
5.7%$335M
ATUSAltice USA, Inc.
FY 2025
Broadband
41.2%$3.5B
Pay TV
30.2%$2.6B
Business Services and Wholesale
17.3%$1.5B
Advertising and News
5.5%$472M
Telephony
3.0%$254M
Mobile
1.9%$165M
Products And Services, Other
0.9%$78M
CHTRCharter Communications, Inc.
FY 2025
Residential Product Line
45.3%$42.6B
Residential Internet Product Line
25.3%$23.8B
Residential Video Product Line
14.6%$13.7B
Commercial Product Line
7.8%$7.3B
Residential Mobile Service Product Line
4.0%$3.8B
Advertising sales
1.6%$1.5B
Residential Voice Product Line
1.4%$1.4B

SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFYBRLAGGINGCHTR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FYBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CHTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $54.6B annually — 205.2x SHEN's $266M. CHTR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ATUS's -21.8%. On growth, FYBR holds the edge at +4.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CHTR logoCHTRCharter Communica…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$266M$12.1B$6.1B$8.6B$54.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$104M$2.4B$2.1B$1.6B$20.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$36M-$1.7B-$381M-$1.9B$5.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$276M$5.4B-$1.4B$163M$4.0B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+37.9%+35.2%+65.1%+51.6%+43.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-10.3%-2.6%+5.3%-1.3%+24.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-13.7%-14.3%-6.2%-21.8%+9.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-103.5%+44.9%-23.2%+1.9%+7.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%-8.9%+4.1%-2.3%-1.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-18.2%0.0%+9.1%-25.0%+8.9%
FYBR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ATUS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, CHTR's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHEN's 13.8x.

MetricSHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CHTR logoCHTRCharter Communica…
Market CapShares × price$898M$8.7B$9.6B$539M$20.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.5B$25.4B$20.9B$25.6B$116.9B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-22.86x-4.83x-29.61x-8.59x4.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.3.80x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple13.80x9.91x10.55x7.70x5.31x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.51x0.70x1.62x0.06x0.37x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.92x1.93x1.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF23.49x3.61x4.59x
ATUS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CHTR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CHTR delivers a 25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. SHEN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHTR's 4.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHTR scores 7/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CHTR logoCHTRCharter Communica…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-3.7%-79.4%-8.1%+25.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-2.0%-5.3%-1.8%-156.2%+3.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.1%-0.8%+1.7%-0.8%+8.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.3%-0.6%+1.8%-0.8%+9.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–934557
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.66x2.44x4.73x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$614M$16.7B$11.2B-$762M$96.6B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$1.0B$806M$1.0B$477M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$642M$17.7B$12.0B$250M$97.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.65x-1.12x0.44x2.48x
CHTR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FYBR five years ago would be worth $14,855 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $509 for ATUS. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs CHTR's -60.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs CHTR's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CHTR logoCHTRCharter Communica…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+43.5%+10.0%+1.1%+9.9%-23.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.3%+100.0%+5.5%-28.7%-60.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.6%+267.8%+105.5%-37.0%-54.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-27.9%-28.8%+48.6%-94.9%-76.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+21.6%-35.7%+42.8%-88.0%-24.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-4.8%+54.4%+27.1%-14.3%-23.0%
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FYBR is the less volatile stock with a 0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FYBR currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs CHTR's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CHTR logoCHTRCharter Communica…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.89x2.74x0.06x1.80x0.33x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.34$11.95$38.50$2.98$437.06
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$9.66$3.37$36.04$1.59$156.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.6%+70.8%+100.0%+63.4%+36.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.273.472.857.928.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded300K12.5M0956K2.3M
FYBR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SHEN as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold", FYBR as "Buy", ATUS as "Buy", CHTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). SHEN is the only dividend payer here at 0.72% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSHEN logoSHENShenandoah Teleco…LUMN logoLUMNLumen Technologie…FYBR logoFYBRFrontier Communic…ATUS logoATUSAltice USA, Inc.CHTR logoCHTRCharter Communica…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$7.08$34.33$2.50$277.40
# AnalystsCovering analysts828113655
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises3003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.12$0.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+0.7%0.0%+25.3%
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FYBR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Risk & Volatility). ATUS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallFrontier Communications Par… (FYBR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SHEN vs LUMN vs FYBR vs ATUS vs CHTR: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) offers the better valuation at 4. 4x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR?

Over the past 5 years, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) delivered a total return of +48. 6%, compared to -94. 9% for Altice USA, Inc. (ATUS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FYBR returned +42. 8% versus ATUS's -88. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 06β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 4157% more volatile than FYBR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 5% for Charter Communications, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.

1% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Charter Communications, Inc. grew EPS 3. 5% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR?

Charter Communications, Inc.

(CHTR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -21. 8% for Altice USA, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHTR leads at 24. 3% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FYBR leads at 64. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78.

7% to $29. 00.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR?

In this comparison, SHEN (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. LUMN, FYBR, ATUS, CHTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is SHEN or LUMN or FYBR or ATUS or CHTR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.

(FYBR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 06)). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FYBR: +42. 8%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SHEN and LUMN and FYBR and ATUS and CHTR?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FYBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock. SHEN pays a dividend while LUMN, FYBR, ATUS, CHTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SHEN

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LUMN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 21%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FYBR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 39%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHTR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SHEN and LUMN and FYBR and ATUS and CHTR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SHEN: -100.0% · LUMN: -8.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.