SHIP vs NMM

For growth investors, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the stronger pick with 2. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. at 16. 0x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +65. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NMM returned +267. 2% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 68% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 46% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is pulling ahead at 2. 1% versus -5. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navios Maritime Partners L. P. grew EPS -14. 9% year-over-year, compared to -52. 1% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 5% net margin versus 13. 2% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — meaning it keeps 27. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NMM leads at 33. 6% versus 26. 0% for SHIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 6. 9x for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) offers the highest yield at 2. 9%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 72), +267. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (NMM: +267. 2%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

SHIP pays a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.