Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$342M
5Y Perf.-17.4%
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$730M
5Y Perf.+579.9%
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNASDAQ • GR
Market Cap$3.09B
5Y Perf.+3.6%
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.10B
5Y Perf.+434.1%
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Marine Shipping

IndustrialsNYSE • MC
Market Cap$2.07B
5Y Perf.+969.8%

SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SHIP logoSHIP
SB logoSB
SBLK logoSBLK
GNK logoGNK
NMM logoNMM
IndustryMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine ShippingMarine Shipping
Market Cap$342M$730M$3.09B$1.10B$2.07B
Revenue (TTM)$153M$275M$1.04B$114.70B$1.31B
Net Income (TTM)$15M$46M$84M$9.32B$262M
Gross Margin45.4%36.9%33.0%62.9%56.7%
Operating Margin23.4%26.0%13.6%0.0%28.2%
Forward P/E6.9x12.6x8.0x14.9x4.8x
Total Debt$290M$537M$1.07B$200M$1.42B
Cash & Equiv.$63M$84M$500M$56M$270M

SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SHIP
SB
SBLK
GNK
NMM
StockMay 20May 26Return
Seanergy Maritime H… (SHIP)10082.6-17.4%
Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB)100679.9+579.9%
Star Bulk Carriers … (SBLK)100526.7+426.7%
Genco Shipping & Tr… (GNK)100534.1+434.1%
Navios Maritime Par… (NMM)1001069.8+969.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NMM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Safe Bulkers, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. SHIP also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHIP
Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
The Momentum Pick

SHIP ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Best for: momentum
SB
Safe Bulkers, Inc.
The Income Pick

SB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 4.0%
  • Rev growth 8.2%, EPS growth 36.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -2.2%
  • Beta 0.98, yield 4.0%, current ratio 1.91x
  • 8.2% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

SBLK is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 9.8% 10Y total return vs SB's 7.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.73, Low D/E 43.8%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading Limited
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, GNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
The Value Play

NMM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (4.8x vs 14.9x)
  • 19.9% margin vs SBLK's 8.1%
  • Beta 0.72 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
  • 4.4% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 3.2%
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSB logoSB8.2% revenue growth vs GNK's -19.1%
ValueNMM logoNMMLower P/E (4.8x vs 14.9x)
Quality / MarginsNMM logoNMM19.9% margin vs SBLK's 8.1%
Stability / SafetyNMM logoNMMBeta 0.72 vs SHIP's 1.21, lower leverage
DividendsSB logoSB4.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs SBLK's 1.1%
Momentum (1Y)SHIP logoSHIP+207.0% vs SBLK's +83.1%
Efficiency (ROA)NMM logoNMM4.4% ROA vs SBLK's 2.2%, ROIC 8.3% vs 3.2%

SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SHIPSeanergy Maritime Holdings Corp.
FY 2021
Time Charter
81.5%$125M
Spot Charter
18.5%$28M
SBSafe Bulkers, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

SBLKStar Bulk Carriers Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

GNKGenco Shipping & Trading Limited
FY 2025
Cargo and Freight
100.0%$342M
NMMNavios Maritime Partners L.P.

Segment breakdown not available.

SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNMMLAGGINGSBLK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

GNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $114.7B annually — 750.7x SHIP's $153M. NMM is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SBLK's 8.1%. On growth, GNK holds the edge at +1604.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$153M$275M$1.0B$114.7B$1.3B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$68M$131M$311M$112M$693M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$15M$46M$84M$9.3B$262M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$6M$55M$209M$15.2B$30M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.4%+36.9%+33.0%+62.9%+56.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.4%+26.0%+13.6%+0.0%+28.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.7%+16.8%+8.1%+8.1%+19.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.2%+19.9%+20.0%+13.3%+2.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+18.6%-3.7%-2.7%+1604.6%+1.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+84.4%-31.8%+58.3%+175.0%-40.6%
GNK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.0x trailing earnings, NMM trades at a 84% valuation discount to SBLK's 36.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, NMM's 4.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GNK's 14.4x.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Market CapShares × price$342M$730M$3.1B$1.1B$2.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$570M$1.2B$3.7B$1.2B$3.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.05x8.36x36.73x-252.10x5.97x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.93x12.61x8.00x14.93x4.81x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.75x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.38x6.96x11.87x14.38x4.85x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.16x2.37x2.97x3.21x1.55x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.18x0.90x1.26x1.22x0.69x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF20.11x14.73x
NMM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

NMM delivers a 8.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $3 for SBLK. GNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHIP's 1.03x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SB scores 7/9 vs GNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.3%+5.6%+3.4%+4.2%+8.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.5%+3.4%+2.2%+3.0%+4.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.1%+6.6%+3.2%+0.7%+8.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.1%+8.6%+4.0%+0.9%+9.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–937537
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.03x0.65x0.44x0.22x0.46x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$228M$453M$572M$145M$1.2B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$63M$84M$500M$56M$270M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$290M$537M$1.1B$200M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.68x2.34x2.08x0.00x2.78x
NMM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NMM five years ago would be worth $22,051 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,564 for SHIP. Over the past 12 months, SHIP leads with a +207.0% total return vs SBLK's +83.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHIP at 56.3% vs SBLK's 17.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+79.9%+44.6%+40.3%+39.4%+39.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+207.0%+110.5%+83.1%+94.4%+99.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+282.1%+105.9%+60.6%+103.0%+216.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.6%+94.6%+79.1%+95.4%+120.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.7%+765.0%+977.3%+401.1%+267.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+56.3%+27.2%+17.1%+26.6%+46.9%
SHIP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NMM is the less volatile stock with a 0.72 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHIP's 1.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SBLK currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs NMM's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.21x0.98x0.73x1.00x0.72x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$16.77$7.20$27.20$26.09$77.90
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$5.37$3.33$14.79$12.66$35.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.6%+96.3%+98.6%+96.6%+91.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.961.072.863.057.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded258K576K1.4M415K166K
Evenly matched — SBLK and NMM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SHIP as "Buy", SB as "Buy", SBLK as "Buy", GNK as "Buy", NMM as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for NMM (target: $85) vs -39.4% for SB (target: $4). For income investors, SB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs NMM's 0.29%.

MetricSHIP logoSHIPSeanergy Maritime…SB logoSBSafe Bulkers, Inc.SBLK logoSBLKStar Bulk Carrier…GNK logoGNKGenco Shipping & …NMM logoNMMNavios Maritime P…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$17.00$4.20$29.00$20.50$85.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts322242214
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.9%+4.0%+1.1%+3.0%+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises03003
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.46$0.27$0.30$0.76$0.20
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+4.0%+3.2%0.0%+1.2%
SB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NMM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). GNK leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.

Best OverallNavios Maritime Partners L.… (NMM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SHIP vs SB vs SBLK vs GNK vs NMM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the stronger pick with 8. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM) offers the better valuation at 6. 0x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

On trailing P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the cheapest at 6. 0x versus Star Bulk Carriers Corp. at 36. 7x. On forward P/E, Navios Maritime Partners L. P. is actually cheaper at 4. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

Over the past 5 years, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) delivered a total return of +120. 5%, compared to +65. 6% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. (SHIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SBLK returned +977. 3% versus SHIP's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 72β versus Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. 's 1. 21β — meaning SHIP is approximately 68% more volatile than NMM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 103% for Seanergy Maritime Holdings Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is pulling ahead at 8. 2% versus -19. 1% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited (GNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Safe Bulkers, Inc. grew EPS 36. 1% year-over-year, compared to -105. 7% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NMM leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

Safe Bulkers, Inc.

(SB) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 7% net margin versus -1. 3% for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — meaning it keeps 31. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SB leads at 36. 4% versus 2. 7% for GNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NMM leads at 66. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Navios Maritime Partners L.

P. (NMM) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Genco Shipping & Trading Limited — 10. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NMM: 18. 8% to $85. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Safe Bulkers, Inc. (SB) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 0. 3% for Navios Maritime Partners L. P. (NMM).

09

Is SHIP or SB or SBLK or GNK or NMM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Star Bulk Carriers Corp.

(SBLK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73), 1. 1% yield, +977. 3% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SBLK: +977. 3%, SHIP: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SHIP and SB and SBLK and GNK and NMM?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SHIP is a small-cap deep-value stock; SB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SBLK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GNK is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NMM is a small-cap deep-value stock. SHIP, SB, SBLK, GNK pay a dividend while NMM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SHIP

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 9%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SBLK

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GNK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 80229%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NMM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SHIP and SB and SBLK and GNK and NMM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SHIP: 18.6% · SB: -3.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(SHIP: 9.7% · SB: 16.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SHIP: 16.0x · SB: 8.4x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.