SHOO
Steven Madden, Ltd.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$2.89B
5Y Perf.+68.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SHOO vs WWW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
WWW
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Market Cap$1.39B
5Y Perf.-18.7%
SHOO vs WWW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SHOO | WWW |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $2.89B | $1.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.63B | $1.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $76M | $95M |
| Gross Margin | 44.8% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 4.8% | 7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 18.9x | 12.8x |
| Total Debt | $486M | $652M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $112M | $206M |
SHOO vs WWW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SHOO
WWW
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) | 100 | 168.5 | +68.5% |
| Wolverine World Wid… (WWW) | 100 | 81.3 | -18.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHOO vs WWW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: WWW leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Steven Madden, Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SHOO
Steven Madden, Ltd.
The Growth Play
SHOO is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 10.5%, EPS growth -73.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
- 98.0% 10Y total return vs WWW's 7.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.10, Low D/E 53.8%, current ratio 1.90x
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
WWW
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
The Income Pick
WWW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.74, yield 2.4%
- Beta 1.74, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.40x
- Lower P/E (12.8x vs 18.9x)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SHOO | 10.5% revenue growth vs WWW's 6.8% |
| Value | WWW | Lower P/E (12.8x vs 18.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | WWW | 5.1% margin vs SHOO's 2.9% |
| Stability / Safety | WWW | Beta 1.74 vs SHOO's 2.10 |
| Dividends | SHOO | 2.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs WWW's 2.4% |
| Momentum (1Y) | SHOO | +72.8% vs WWW's +17.7% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | WWW | 5.5% ROA vs SHOO's 3.9%, ROIC 11.6% vs 4.9% |
SHOO vs WWW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
SHOO vs WWW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLWWWLAGGINGSHOO
SHOOSteven Madden, Ltd.
1leads
WWWWolverine World Wide,…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SHOOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
WWW5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
WWW6/6
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
WWW5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SHOO5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHOO and WWW operate at a comparable scale, with $2.6B and $1.9B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.1% (WWW) to 2.9% (SHOO). On growth, SHOO holds the edge at +18.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SHOOSteven Madden, Lt… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $1.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $151M | $163M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $76M | $95M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $87M | $126M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.8% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +5.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.3% | +6.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +18.0% | +4.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +75.4% | +102.0% |
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
WWW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 0.2x trailing earnings, WWW trades at a 100% valuation discount to SHOO's 62.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, WWW's 12.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SHOO's 31.9x.
| Metric | SHOOSteven Madden, Lt… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.9B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.3B | $1.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.92x | 0.18x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 18.89x | 12.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 31.89x | 12.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.15x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.12x | 2.59x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.18x | 11.11x |
WWW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WWW delivers a 17.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $8 for SHOO. SHOO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WWW's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WWW scores 8/9 vs SHOO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | SHOOSteven Madden, Lt… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.4% | +17.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.9% | +5.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.9% | +11.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +12.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 1.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $374M | $446M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $112M | $206M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $486M | $652M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 29.99x | 3.19x |
WWW leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHOO five years ago would be worth $10,125 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,310 for WWW. Over the past 12 months, SHOO leads with a +72.8% total return vs WWW's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHOO at 8.8% vs WWW's 5.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SHOOSteven Madden, Lt… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.6% | -5.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +72.8% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +28.7% | +16.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1.3% | -56.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +98.0% | +7.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.8% | +5.3% |
SHOO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHOO and WWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WWW is the less volatile stock with a 1.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SHOO's 2.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHOO currently trades 84.6% from its 52-week high vs WWW's 51.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SHOOSteven Madden, Lt… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.10x | 1.74x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $46.88 | $32.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.98 | $13.47 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.6% | +51.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.9 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 1.0M |
Evenly matched — SHOO and WWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SHOO and WWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SHOO as "Buy" and WWW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 25.4% upside for WWW (target: $21) vs 8.9% for SHOO (target: $43). For income investors, WWW offers the higher dividend yield at 2.40% vs SHOO's 2.16%.
| Metric | SHOOSteven Madden, Lt… | WWWWolverine World W… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $43.17 | $21.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.2% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.86 | $0.41 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +1.0% |
Evenly matched — SHOO and WWW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
WWW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SHOO leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallWolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SHOO vs WWW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHOO or WWW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Steven Madden, Ltd.
(SHOO) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 8% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the better valuation at 0. 2x trailing P/E (12. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) a "Buy" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHOO or WWW?
On trailing P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the cheapest at 0. 2x versus Steven Madden, Ltd. at 62. 9x. On forward P/E, Wolverine World Wide, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHOO or WWW?
Over the past 5 years, Steven Madden, Ltd.
(SHOO) delivered a total return of +1. 3%, compared to -56. 9% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHOO returned +98. 0% versus WWW's +7. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHOO or WWW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 74β versus Steven Madden, Ltd. 's 2. 10β — meaning SHOO is approximately 21% more volatile than WWW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 122% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHOO or WWW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Steven Madden, Ltd.
(SHOO) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus 6. 8% for Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wolverine World Wide, Inc. grew EPS 159. 5% year-over-year, compared to -73. 2% for Steven Madden, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHOO leads at 5. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHOO or WWW?
Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus 1. 8% for Steven Madden, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WWW leads at 8. 0% versus 2. 7% for SHOO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WWW leads at 47. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHOO or WWW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) trades at 12. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 9x for Steven Madden, Ltd. — 6. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WWW: 25. 4% to $21. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHOO or WWW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Wolverine World Wide, Inc. (WWW) offers the highest yield at 2. 4%, versus 2. 2% for Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO).
09Is SHOO or WWW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wolverine World Wide, Inc.
(WWW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 4% yield). Steven Madden, Ltd. (SHOO) carries a higher beta of 2. 10 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WWW: +7. 2%, SHOO: +98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHOO and WWW?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHOO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WWW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SHOO: 18.0% · WWW: 4.6%)Net Margin>
%
(SHOO: 2.9% · WWW: 5.1%)P/E Ratio<
x
(SHOO: 62.9x · WWW: 0.2x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.