Chemicals - Specialty
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Chemicals
Chemicals
Chemicals - Specialty
SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Chemicals - Specialty | Chemicals | Chemicals | Chemicals - Specialty |
| Market Cap | $78.98B | $2.56B | $26.86B | $24.38B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $23.94B | $5.69B | $39.33B | $16.12B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2.60B | $-324M | $-2.76B | $1.58B |
| Gross Margin | 49.1% | 12.9% | 6.2% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.1% | -1.0% | -2.3% | 12.8% |
| Forward P/E | 27.3x | — | 12.6x | 13.8x |
| Total Debt | $14.53B | $2.73B | $19.60B | $7.45B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $207M | $429M | $3.82B | $2.16B |
SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Huntsman Corporation (HUN) | 100 | 81.2 | -18.8% |
| Dow Inc. (DOW) | 100 | 96.7 | -3.3% |
| PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) | 100 | 107.1 | +7.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SHW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.1%, EPS growth -2.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.1%
- 250.0% 10Y total return vs HUN's 57.6%
- 2.1% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0%
- 10.9% margin vs DOW's -7.0%
HUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +37.5% vs SHW's -8.0%
DOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.76, yield 5.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.76, yield 5.6%, current ratio 1.97x
- Beta 0.76 vs HUN's 1.73
PPG is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.50 vs SHW's 3.94
- Better valuation composite
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.1% revenue growth vs DOW's -7.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.9% margin vs DOW's -7.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs HUN's 1.73 | |
| Dividends | 1.0% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs HUN's 5.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.5% vs SHW's -8.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.0% ROA vs DOW's -4.6%, ROIC 16.5% vs 0.6% |
SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SHW leads in 2 of 6 categories
PPG leads 2 • HUN leads 0 • DOW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.3B annually — 6.9x HUN's $5.7B. SHW is the more profitable business, keeping 10.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DOW's -7.0%. On growth, SHW holds the edge at +6.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $23.9B | $5.7B | $39.3B | $16.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4.5B | $160M | $1.3B | $2.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2.6B | -$324M | -$2.8B | $1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.9B | $135M | -$2.0B | $1.2B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.1% | +12.9% | +6.2% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.1% | -1.0% | -2.3% | +12.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | -5.7% | -7.0% | +9.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +2.4% | -5.1% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +6.8% | +0.7% | -6.1% | +6.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +7.5% | -3.3% | -68.2% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PPG leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.7x trailing earnings, PPG trades at a 50% valuation discount to SHW's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PPG offers better value at 1.71x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $79.0B | $2.6B | $26.9B | $24.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $93.3B | $4.9B | $42.6B | $29.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.18x | -9.27x | -10.11x | 15.74x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 27.27x | — | 12.62x | 13.82x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 4.51x | — | — | 1.71x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.24x | 19.64x | 13.78x | 11.00x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.35x | 0.45x | 0.67x | 1.54x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.33x | 0.86x | 1.52x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 29.76x | 22.11x | — | 20.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PPG leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHW delivers a 58.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $58 in annual profit, vs $-15 for DOW. HUN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.92x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHW's 3.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PPG scores 7/9 vs HUN's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +58.2% | -8.1% | -15.4% | +31.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +10.0% | -4.6% | -4.6% | +8.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.5% | -0.6% | +0.6% | +23.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +21.3% | -0.7% | +0.5% | +24.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.16x | 0.92x | 1.12x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.3B | $2.3B | $15.8B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $207M | $429M | $3.8B | $2.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $2.7B | $19.6B | $7.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.83x | -1.08x | -1.51x | 9.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHW five years ago would be worth $11,612 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,018 for HUN. Over the past 12 months, HUN leads with a +37.5% total return vs SHW's -8.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHW at 12.5% vs HUN's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +45.5% | +55.2% | +5.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -8.0% | +37.5% | +37.3% | +4.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.4% | -33.3% | -17.5% | -15.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.1% | -39.8% | -27.2% | -32.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +250.0% | +57.6% | +12.2% | +21.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +12.5% | -12.6% | -6.2% | -5.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — HUN and DOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DOW is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than HUN's 1.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUN currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs PPG's 81.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.73x | 0.76x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $379.65 | $15.89 | $42.74 | $133.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $301.58 | $7.30 | $20.40 | $93.39 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +84.3% | +92.7% | +87.3% | +81.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.6 | 65.4 | 48.9 | 54.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 6.2M | 14.4M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SHW and HUN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SHW as "Buy", HUN as "Hold", DOW as "Hold", PPG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 21.6% upside for SHW (target: $389) vs -18.6% for HUN (target: $12). For income investors, HUN offers the higher dividend yield at 5.74% vs SHW's 0.99%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $389.43 | $12.00 | $39.55 | $127.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 38 | 33 | 35 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.0% | +5.7% | +5.6% | +2.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 37 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.17 | $0.85 | $2.09 | $2.77 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% | +3.2% |
SHW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). PPG leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SHW vs HUN vs DOW vs PPG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger pick with 2.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (13. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG?
On trailing P/E, PPG Industries, Inc.
(PPG) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Dow Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: PPG Industries, Inc. wins at 1. 50x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG?
Over the past 5 years, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) delivered a total return of +16.
1%, compared to -39. 8% for Huntsman Corporation (HUN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHW returned +250. 0% versus DOW's +12. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Dow Inc.
(DOW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus Huntsman Corporation's 1. 73β — meaning HUN is approximately 129% more volatile than DOW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 92% versus 3% for The Sherwin-Williams Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is pulling ahead at 2.
1% versus -7. 0% for Dow Inc. (DOW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PPG Industries, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -335. 0% for Dow Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHW leads at 2. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG?
The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
9% net margin versus -6. 6% for Dow Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHW leads at 16. 1% versus -0. 7% for HUN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, PPG Industries, Inc. (PPG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 50x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Dow Inc. (DOW) trades at 12. 6x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for The Sherwin-Williams Company — 14. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHW: 21. 6% to $389. 43.
08Which pays a better dividend — SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Huntsman Corporation (HUN) offers the highest yield at 5. 7%, versus 1. 0% for The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW).
09Is SHW or HUN or DOW or PPG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
79), 1. 0% yield, +250. 0% 10Y return). Huntsman Corporation (HUN) carries a higher beta of 1. 73 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHW: +250. 0%, HUN: +57. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SHW and HUN and DOW and PPG?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; HUN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; DOW is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; PPG is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.