Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SIF vs TDY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
SIF vs TDY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $98M | $29.83B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $88M | $6.27B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $950M |
| Gross Margin | 16.9% | 37.7% |
| Operating Margin | 4.7% | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 54.4x | 26.8x |
| Total Debt | $24M | $2.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $352M |
SIF vs TDY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SIFCO Industries, I… (SIF) | 100 | 438.6 | +338.6% |
| Teledyne Technologi… (TDY) | 100 | 172.2 | +72.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIF vs TDY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIF is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +474.2% vs TDY's +35.3%
TDY carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.95
- Rev growth 7.9%, EPS growth 9.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.9%
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs SIF's 50.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.9% revenue growth vs SIF's 6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (26.8x vs 54.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.1% margin vs SIF's 3.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs SIF's 1.48, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +474.2% vs TDY's +35.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs SIF's 4.5%, ROIC 7.0% vs 0.2% |
SIF vs TDY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SIF vs TDY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDY is the larger business by revenue, generating $6.3B annually — 71.3x SIF's $88M. TDY is the more profitable business, keeping 15.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIF's 3.8%. On growth, SIF holds the edge at +14.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $88M | $6.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | $950M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $11M | $1.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +16.9% | +37.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.8% | +15.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +13.0% | +16.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.8% | +7.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +176.3% | +21.6% |
Valuation Metrics
SIF leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, TDY's 21.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SIF's 23.0x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $98M | $29.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $120M | $32.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -131.58x | 34.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 54.45x | 26.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.79x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 23.01x | 21.62x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 4.88x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.59x | 2.90x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 27.78x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDY delivers a 8.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $9 for SIF. TDY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.25x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIF's 0.65x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDY scores 7/9 vs SIF's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.7% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.5% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.2% | +7.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.4% | +8.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.65x | 0.25x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $22M | $2.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $352M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $24M | $2.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.84x | 24.51x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SIF leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDY five years ago would be worth $14,846 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,355 for SIF. Over the past 12 months, SIF leads with a +474.2% total return vs TDY's +35.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SIF at 89.5% vs TDY's 15.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +176.5% | +24.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +474.2% | +35.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +580.6% | +55.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.6% | +48.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.4% | +585.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +89.5% | +15.9% |
Risk & Volatility
TDY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDY is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SIF's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TDY currently trades 92.9% from its 52-week high vs SIF's 89.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.57 | $693.38 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.57 | $471.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.9% | +92.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.8 | 46.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 76K | 305K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $711.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.4% |
TDY leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIF leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).
SIF vs TDY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIF or TDY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the stronger pick with 7.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF). Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) offers the better valuation at 34. 1x trailing P/E (26. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIF or TDY?
On forward P/E, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated is actually cheaper at 26.
8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIF or TDY?
Over the past 5 years, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) delivered a total return of +48.
5%, compared to +23. 6% for SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TDY returned +585. 8% versus SIF's +50. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIF or TDY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
95β versus SIFCO Industries, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SIF is approximately 57% more volatile than TDY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 25% versus 65% for SIFCO Industries, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIF or TDY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is pulling ahead at 7.
9% versus 6. 5% for SIFCO Industries, Inc. (SIF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SIFCO Industries, Inc. grew EPS 86. 7% year-over-year, compared to 9. 7% for Teledyne Technologies Incorporated. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDY leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIF or TDY?
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
6% net margin versus -0. 9% for SIFCO Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 14. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDY leads at 18. 8% versus 0. 2% for SIF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDY leads at 39. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIF or TDY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) trades at 26.
8x forward P/E versus 54. 4x for SIFCO Industries, Inc. — 27. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIF or TDY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SIF or TDY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Teledyne Technologies Incorporated (TDY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
95), +585. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDY: +585. 8%, SIF: +50. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIF and TDY?
These companies operate in different sectors (SIF (Industrials) and TDY (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.