Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SIM vs CMC

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SIM
Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V.

Steel

Basic MaterialsAMEX • MX
Market Cap$5.10B
5Y Perf.+363.7%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company

Steel

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$8.01B
5Y Perf.+320.5%

SIM vs CMC — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SIM logoSIM
CMC logoCMC
IndustrySteelSteel
Market Cap$5.10B$8.01B
Revenue (TTM)$30.16B$8.01B
Net Income (TTM)$1.52B$438M
Gross Margin25.2%16.5%
Operating Margin17.3%7.5%
Forward P/E16.6x11.0x
Total Debt$5M$1.35B
Cash & Equiv.$28.59B$1.04B

SIM vs CMCLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SIM
CMC
StockMay 20May 26Return
Grupo Simec, S.A.B.… (SIM)100463.7+363.7%
Commercial Metals C… (CMC)100420.5+320.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SIM vs CMC

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: CMC leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SIM
Grupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V.
The Income Pick

SIM is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.44
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 5.49x
  • Beta 0.44, current ratio 5.49x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
The Growth Play

CMC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth -1.6%, EPS growth -82.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.4%
  • 345.8% 10Y total return vs SIM's 229.2%
  • -1.6% revenue growth vs SIM's -15.6%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCMC logoCMC-1.6% revenue growth vs SIM's -15.6%
ValueCMC logoCMCLower P/E (11.0x vs 16.6x)
Quality / MarginsCMC logoCMC5.5% margin vs SIM's 5.0%
Stability / SafetySIM logoSIMBeta 0.44 vs CMC's 1.53, lower leverage
DividendsCMC logoCMC1.0% yield; 4-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CMC logoCMC+60.6% vs SIM's +11.5%
Efficiency (ROA)CMC logoCMC4.7% ROA vs SIM's 2.1%, ROIC 8.5% vs 11.2%

SIM vs CMC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SIMGrupo Simec, S.A.B. de C.V.
FY 2021
RebarMember
35.3%$19.6B
HotRolledBarsMember
20.5%$11.4B
OthersMember
10.1%$5.6B
StructuralMember
9.6%$5.3B
BarsMember
8.0%$4.5B
FlatRebarMember
6.1%$3.4B
ColdDrawnBarsMember
5.8%$3.2B
Other (1)
4.7%$2.6B
CMCCommercial Metals Company
FY 2025
Steel Products
42.2%$3.3B
Downstream Products
29.3%$2.3B
Raw Material Products
17.0%$1.3B
Other Product
4.2%$326M
Construction Products
3.9%$304M
Ground Stabilization Products
3.4%$262M

SIM vs CMC — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCMCLAGGINGSIM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

SIM is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.2B annually — 3.8x CMC's $8.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.5% (CMC) to 5.0% (SIM). On growth, CMC holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSIM logoSIMGrupo Simec, S.A.…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$30.2B$8.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$6.3B$890M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.5B$438M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$2.2B$296M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.2%+16.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+17.3%+7.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.0%+5.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-7.2%+3.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-11.2%+11.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-74.1%+2.0%
CMC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CMC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 61.6x trailing earnings, SIM trades at a 37% valuation discount to CMC's 97.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CMC's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SIM's 10.8x.

MetricSIM logoSIMGrupo Simec, S.A.…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Market CapShares × price$5.1B$8.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.4B$8.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS61.58x97.50x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.64x11.03x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple10.76x10.33x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.11x1.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.48x1.96x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF25.65x
CMC leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

SIM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

CMC delivers a 10.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for SIM. SIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CMC's 0.32x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SIM scores 6/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSIM logoSIMGrupo Simec, S.A.…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%+10.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.1%+4.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.2%+8.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.2%+8.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.32x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$28.6B$311M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$28.6B$1.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$1.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense26.91x9.84x
SIM leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CMC five years ago would be worth $23,411 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,265 for SIM. Over the past 12 months, CMC leads with a +60.6% total return vs SIM's +11.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CMC at 18.7% vs SIM's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSIM logoSIMGrupo Simec, S.A.…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+3.6%+1.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+11.5%+60.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.9%+67.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.6%+134.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+229.2%+345.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.3%+18.7%
CMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

SIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

SIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMC's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SIM currently trades 88.9% from its 52-week high vs CMC's 85.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSIM logoSIMGrupo Simec, S.A.…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.44x1.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$34.59$84.87
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$25.00$44.67
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+88.9%+85.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.158.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded2391.1M
SIM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CMC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Wall Street rates SIM as "Hold" and CMC as "Buy". CMC is the only dividend payer here at 0.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSIM logoSIMGrupo Simec, S.A.…CMC logoCMCCommercial Metals…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$82.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts126
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises14
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.71
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+2.6%
CMC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CMC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SIM leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility).

Best OverallCommercial Metals Company (CMC)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SIM vs CMC: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SIM or CMC a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is the stronger pick with -1.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM). Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM) offers the better valuation at 61. 6x trailing P/E (16. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Commercial Metals Company (CMC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SIM or CMC?

On trailing P/E, Grupo Simec, S.

A. B. de C. V. (SIM) is the cheapest at 61. 6x versus Commercial Metals Company at 97. 5x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SIM or CMC?

Over the past 5 years, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) delivered a total return of +134.

1%, compared to +102. 6% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CMC returned +345. 8% versus SIM's +229. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SIM or CMC?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Simec, S.

A. B. de C. V. (SIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Commercial Metals Company's 1. 53β — meaning CMC is approximately 251% more volatile than SIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 32% for Commercial Metals Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SIM or CMC?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Commercial Metals Company (CMC) is pulling ahead at -1.

6% versus -15. 6% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Commercial Metals Company grew EPS -82. 1% year-over-year, compared to -87. 5% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SIM or CMC?

Grupo Simec, S.

A. B. de C. V. (SIM) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 1% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 5. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIM leads at 16. 0% versus 6. 7% for CMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SIM leads at 25. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SIM or CMC more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 11.

0x forward P/E versus 16. 6x for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SIM or CMC?

In this comparison, CMC (1.

0% yield) pays a dividend. SIM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SIM or CMC better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Grupo Simec, S.

A. B. de C. V. (SIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 44), +229. 2% 10Y return). Commercial Metals Company (CMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SIM: +229. 2%, CMC: +345. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SIM and CMC?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

CMC pays a dividend while SIM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SIM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CMC

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SIM and CMC on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SIM: -11.2% · CMC: 11.0%)
Net Margin>
%
(SIM: 5.0% · CMC: 5.5%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SIM: 61.6x · CMC: 97.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.