Steel
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Steel
Steel
Steel
Steel
SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Steel | Steel | Steel | Steel | Steel |
| Market Cap | $5.10B | $8.01B | $53.35B | $35.04B | $19.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $30.16B | $8.01B | $34.16B | $19.01B | $14.84B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.52B | $438M | $2.33B | $1.37B | $806M |
| Gross Margin | 25.2% | 16.5% | 14.0% | 14.0% | 27.2% |
| Operating Margin | 17.3% | 7.5% | 10.0% | 9.4% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 16.6x | 11.0x | 16.7x | 16.2x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $1.35B | $7.12B | $4.21B | $1.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28.59B | $1.04B | $2.26B | $770M | $217M |
SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grupo Simec, S.A.B.… (SIM) | 100 | 463.7 | +363.7% |
| Commercial Metals C… (CMC) | 100 | 420.5 | +320.5% |
| Nucor Corporation (NUE) | 100 | 554.2 | +454.2% |
| Steel Dynamics, Inc. (STLD) | 100 | 910.6 | +810.6% |
| Reliance Steel & Al… (RS) | 100 | 388.1 | +288.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SIM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.44, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 5.49x
- Beta 0.44 vs CMC's 1.53, lower leverage
CMC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 19.3x)
NUE has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 5.7%, EPS growth -11.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -7.8%
- PEG 0.64 vs RS's 0.97
- 5.7% revenue growth vs SIM's -15.6%
- +102.3% vs SIM's +11.5%
STLD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 9.2% 10Y total return vs NUE's 416.6%
- 7.2% margin vs SIM's 5.0%
- 8.5% ROA vs SIM's 2.1%, ROIC 9.2% vs 11.2%
RS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 23 yrs, beta 0.75, yield 1.3%
- Beta 0.75, yield 1.3%, current ratio 4.88x
- 1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs STLD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.7% revenue growth vs SIM's -15.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 19.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs SIM's 5.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.44 vs CMC's 1.53, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.3% yield, 23-year raise streak, vs STLD's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +102.3% vs SIM's +11.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.5% ROA vs SIM's 2.1%, ROIC 9.2% vs 11.2% |
SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CMC leads in 1 of 6 categories
SIM leads 1 • STLD leads 1 • RS leads 1 • NUE leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NUE and RS each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NUE is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.2B annually — 4.3x CMC's $8.0B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.2% (STLD) to 5.0% (SIM). On growth, NUE holds the edge at +21.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $30.2B | $8.0B | $34.2B | $19.0B | $14.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $6.3B | $890M | $4.9B | $2.4B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.5B | $438M | $2.3B | $1.4B | $806M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2.2B | $296M | $532M | $665M | $612M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.2% | +16.5% | +14.0% | +14.0% | +27.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.3% | +7.5% | +10.0% | +9.4% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.0% | +5.5% | +6.8% | +7.2% | +5.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.2% | +3.7% | +1.6% | +3.5% | +4.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -11.2% | +11.0% | +21.3% | +19.1% | +15.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.1% | +2.0% | +3.8% | +93.1% | +36.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CMC leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.9x trailing earnings, RS trades at a 72% valuation discount to CMC's 97.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NUE offers better value at 1.19x vs RS's 1.36x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.1B | $8.0B | $53.3B | $35.0B | $19.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.4B | $8.3B | $58.2B | $38.5B | $21.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 61.58x | 97.50x | 31.15x | 30.27x | 26.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.64x | 11.03x | 16.69x | 16.24x | 19.32x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | 1.20x | 1.36x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.76x | 10.33x | 14.06x | 18.98x | 16.16x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.11x | 1.03x | 1.64x | 1.93x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 1.96x | 2.44x | 4.02x | 2.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 25.65x | — | 69.87x | 38.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SIM leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STLD delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $3 for SIM. SIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to STLD's 0.47x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NUE scores 7/9 vs CMC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.5% | +10.1% | +10.6% | +15.3% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.1% | +4.7% | +6.7% | +8.5% | +7.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.2% | +8.5% | +7.7% | +9.2% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.2% | +8.7% | +8.9% | +10.9% | +11.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.32x | 0.32x | 0.47x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$28.6B | $311M | $4.9B | $3.4B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28.6B | $1.0B | $2.3B | $770M | $217M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $1.4B | $7.1B | $4.2B | $2.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 26.91x | 9.84x | 29.72x | 20.39x | 18.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
STLD leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in STLD five years ago would be worth $40,561 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,265 for SIM. Over the past 12 months, NUE leads with a +102.3% total return vs SIM's +11.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors STLD at 36.2% vs SIM's -1.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +3.6% | +1.0% | +38.6% | +37.7% | +27.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.5% | +60.6% | +102.3% | +85.9% | +28.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.9% | +67.4% | +70.0% | +152.9% | +62.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +102.6% | +134.1% | +155.6% | +305.6% | +126.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +229.2% | +345.8% | +416.6% | +918.7% | +454.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.3% | +18.7% | +19.3% | +36.2% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SIM and NUE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SIM is the less volatile stock with a 0.44 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CMC's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NUE currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs CMC's 85.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.44x | 1.53x | 1.03x | 1.32x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.59 | $84.87 | $235.44 | $243.72 | $381.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $25.00 | $44.67 | $106.21 | $119.89 | $260.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.9% | +85.0% | +99.5% | +99.2% | +98.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.1 | 58.1 | 85.2 | 79.8 | 77.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 239 | 1.1M | 1.4M | 1.1M | 315K |
Analyst Outlook
RS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SIM as "Hold", CMC as "Buy", NUE as "Buy", STLD as "Buy", RS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.7% upside for CMC (target: $83) vs -22.1% for STLD (target: $188). For income investors, RS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.28% vs STLD's 0.81%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $82.75 | $222.83 | $188.40 | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 26 | 32 | 27 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.0% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 4 | 15 | 15 | 23 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.71 | $2.22 | $1.96 | $4.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +2.6% | +1.3% | +2.6% | +3.1% |
CMC leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SIM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
SIM vs CMC vs NUE vs STLD vs RS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the stronger pick with 5.
7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 6% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM). Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) offers the better valuation at 26. 9x trailing P/E (19. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Commercial Metals Company (CMC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS?
On trailing P/E, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the cheapest at 26. 9x versus Commercial Metals Company at 97. 5x. On forward P/E, Commercial Metals Company is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Nucor Corporation wins at 0. 64x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 97x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS?
Over the past 5 years, Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) delivered a total return of +305. 6%, compared to +102. 6% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: STLD returned +918. 7% versus SIM's +229. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grupo Simec, S.
A. B. de C. V. (SIM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 44β versus Commercial Metals Company's 1. 53β — meaning CMC is approximately 251% more volatile than SIM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 47% for Steel Dynamics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Nucor Corporation (NUE) is pulling ahead at 5.
7% versus -15. 6% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V. (SIM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. grew EPS -10. 2% year-over-year, compared to -87. 5% for Grupo Simec, S. A. B. de C. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CMC leads at -4. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS?
Steel Dynamics, Inc.
(STLD) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 5% net margin versus 1. 1% for Commercial Metals Company — meaning it keeps 6. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SIM leads at 16. 0% versus 6. 7% for CMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RS leads at 26. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Nucor Corporation (NUE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 64x versus Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. 's 0. 97x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Commercial Metals Company (CMC) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 3x for Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. — 8. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CMC: 14. 7% to $82. 75.
08Which pays a better dividend — SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS?
In this comparison, RS (1.
3% yield), CMC (1. 0% yield), NUE (0. 9% yield), STLD (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. SIM does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SIM or CMC or NUE or STLD or RS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
(RS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 3% yield, +454. 9% 10Y return). Commercial Metals Company (CMC) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RS: +454. 9%, CMC: +345. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SIM and CMC and NUE and STLD and RS?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
CMC, NUE, STLD, RS pay a dividend while SIM does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.