Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
Waste Management
Chemicals - Specialty
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Agricultural Farm Products | Waste Management | Chemicals - Specialty | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $1K | $312K | $42M | $4M | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10M | $1M | $0.00 | $14M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-39M | $-19M | $-14M | $-27M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 6.9% | 38.8% | — | -82.1% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | -143.5% | -10.6% | — | -116.6% | -86.5% |
| Total Debt | $30M | $1M | $0.00 | $9M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $366K | $490K | $3M | $10M | $99M |
SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Mar 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shineco, Inc. (SISI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| AgriFORCE Growing S… (AGRI) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 5.7 | -94.3% |
| Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) | 100 | 9.1 | -90.9% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 2.1 | -97.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SISI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 16.8%, EPS growth 41.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 48.0%
- 16.8% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
AGRI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
CHNR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- -93.5% 10Y total return vs GURE's -95.3%
- 0.0% margin vs AGRI's -14.4%
- +2.1% vs SISI's -99.2%
- -5.3% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC -0.0% vs -98.0%
GURE is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.52
RCON ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.49, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.49, current ratio 5.88x
- Beta 0.49 vs AGRI's 2.22, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.8% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.0% margin vs AGRI's -14.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.49 vs AGRI's 2.22, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +2.1% vs SISI's -99.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -5.3% ROA vs AGRI's -117.7%, ROIC -0.0% vs -98.0% |
SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
CHNR leads in 2 of 6 categories
SISI leads 1 • GURE leads 1 • AGRI leads 0 • RCON leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GURE and RCON each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RCON and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $66M and $0 in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -64.3% (RCON) to -14.4% (AGRI). On growth, GURE holds the edge at +2.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10M | $1M | $0 | $14M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$9M | -$13M | -$12M | $1M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$39M | -$19M | -$14M | -$27M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$9M | -$6M | -$498,990 | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +6.9% | +38.8% | — | -82.1% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -143.5% | -10.6% | — | -116.6% | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -14.4% | — | -195.8% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | -6.8% | — | -3.6% | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.0% | — | — | +2.5% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.0% | +12.6% | +91.3% | +98.1% | +35.7% |
Valuation Metrics
SISI leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1,352 | $311,837 | $42M | $4M | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $29M | $1M | $41M | $2M | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.00x | -0.02x | -88.65x | -0.06x | -1.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.00x | 4.59x | — | 0.47x | 1.70x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 0.05x | 3.21x | 0.03x | 0.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHNR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RCON delivers a -9.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-9 in annual profit, vs $-160 for AGRI. GURE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SISI's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RCON scores 4/9 vs GURE's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -149.3% | -159.9% | -15.7% | -19.2% | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -45.5% | -117.7% | -5.3% | -16.6% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.6% | -98.0% | -0.0% | -11.2% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -31.6% | -117.1% | -0.0% | -11.6% | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.81x | 0.24x | — | 0.06x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $29M | $995,040 | -$3M | -$1M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $366,140 | $489,868 | $3M | $10M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $30M | $1M | $0 | $9M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -18.13x | -7.20x | -263.29x | -268.95x | -372.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CHNR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CHNR five years ago would be worth $736 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for SISI. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a +2.1% total return vs SISI's -99.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CHNR at -41.2% vs AGRI's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.7% | -52.4% | +22.2% | -11.5% | -46.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.2% | -95.6% | +2.1% | -44.9% | -53.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -79.7% | -88.4% | -88.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -92.6% | -94.9% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -100.0% | -93.5% | -95.3% | -99.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.4% | -96.9% | -41.2% | -51.2% | -51.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SISI and CHNR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SISI is the less volatile stock with a -0.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AGRI's 2.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CHNR currently trades 52.4% from its 52-week high vs SISI's 0.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.50x | 2.22x | 1.10x | 0.52x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.50 | $19.26 | $8.20 | $11.83 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $0.55 | $3.16 | $2.04 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.7% | +4.0% | +52.4% | +28.7% | +11.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.3 | 30.6 | 55.8 | 39.7 | 38.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 200 | 443K | 893K | 60K | 91K |
Analyst Outlook
GURE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 2 | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CHNR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SISI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SISI vs AGRI vs CHNR vs GURE vs RCON: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is the stronger pick with 1681% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). Analysts rate AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) delivered a total return of -92. 6%, compared to -100. 0% for Shineco, Inc. (SISI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHNR returned -93. 5% versus SISI's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 50β versus AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. 's 2. 22β — meaning AGRI is approximately -548% more volatile than SISI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 81% for Shineco, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is pulling ahead at 1681% versus -74. 5% for Gulf Resources, Inc. (GURE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. grew EPS 96. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 3% for Gulf Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SISI leads at 48. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON?
China Natural Resources, Inc.
(CHNR) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -239. 7% for AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CHNR leads at 0. 0% versus -153. 2% for AGRI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SISI or AGRI or CHNR or GURE or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shineco, Inc.
(SISI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 50)). AgriFORCE Growing Systems Ltd. (AGRI) carries a higher beta of 2. 22 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SISI: -100. 0%, AGRI: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SISI and AGRI and CHNR and GURE and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (SISI (Healthcare) and AGRI (Consumer Defensive) and CHNR (Industrials) and GURE (Basic Materials) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SISI is a small-cap high-growth stock; AGRI is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GURE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.