Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SITM
SiTime Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$21.99B
5Y Perf.+2694.6%
DIOD
Diodes Incorporated

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.13B
5Y Perf.+129.1%
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$27.00B
5Y Perf.+1033.5%
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.08B
5Y Perf.+35.3%
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$78.63B
5Y Perf.+663.2%

SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SITM logoSITM
DIOD logoDIOD
MTSI logoMTSI
POWI logoPOWI
MPWR logoMPWR
IndustrySemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductorsSemiconductors
Market Cap$21.99B$5.13B$27.00B$4.08B$78.63B
Revenue (TTM)$380M$1.56B$1.07B$446M$2.79B
Net Income (TTM)$-24M$86M$177M$17M$616M
Gross Margin55.7%31.3%55.3%53.9%55.2%
Operating Margin-12.7%3.5%16.0%4.6%26.1%
Forward P/E106.1x42.6x73.3x58.7x67.2x
Total Debt$5M$96M$538M$0.00$24M
Cash & Equiv.$17M$367M$112M$59M$1.10B

SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SITM
DIOD
MTSI
POWI
MPWR
StockMay 20May 26Return
SiTime Corporation (SITM)1002794.6+2694.6%
Diodes Incorporated (DIOD)100229.1+129.1%
MACOM Technology So… (MTSI)1001133.5+1033.5%
Power Integrations,… (POWI)100135.3+35.3%
Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR)100763.2+663.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SITM and MPWR are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. DIOD, MTSI, and POWI also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SITM
SiTime Corporation
The Growth Play

SITM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 61.2%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
  • 63.1% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 25.3%
  • 61.2% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
  • +342.0% vs POWI's +43.3%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
DIOD
Diodes Incorporated
The Value Play

DIOD ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (42.6x vs 67.2x)
Best for: value
MTSI
MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

MTSI is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.69, Low D/E 40.5%, current ratio 3.71x
  • Beta 1.69 vs SITM's 2.48
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Income Pick

POWI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.11, yield 1.1%
  • Beta 2.11, yield 1.1%, current ratio 6.51x
  • 1.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
MPWR
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
The Quality Compounder

MPWR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if quality and efficiency is your priority.

  • 22.1% margin vs SITM's -6.4%
  • 15.2% ROA vs SITM's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.9%
Best for: quality and efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSITM logoSITM61.2% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
ValueDIOD logoDIODLower P/E (42.6x vs 67.2x)
Quality / MarginsMPWR logoMPWR22.1% margin vs SITM's -6.4%
Stability / SafetyMTSI logoMTSIBeta 1.69 vs SITM's 2.48
DividendsPOWI logoPOWI1.1% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SITM logoSITM+342.0% vs POWI's +43.3%
Efficiency (ROA)MPWR logoMPWR15.2% ROA vs SITM's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.9%

SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SITMSiTime Corporation
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$327M
DIODDiodes Incorporated
FY 2025
Customer One
100.0%$182M
MTSIMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

POWIPower Integrations, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

MPWRMonolithic Power Systems, Inc.
FY 2023
DC To DC Products
94.4%$1.7B
Lighting Control Products
5.6%$102M

SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLMPWRLAGGINGPOWI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 7.3x SITM's $380M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SITM's -6.4%. On growth, SITM holds the edge at +88.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSITM logoSITMSiTime CorporationDIOD logoDIODDiodes Incorporat…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$380M$1.6B$1.1B$446M$2.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$24M$162M$223M$41M$781M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$24M$86M$177M$17M$616M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$54M$129M$168M$85M$664M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+55.7%+31.3%+55.3%+53.9%+55.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-12.7%+3.5%+16.0%+4.6%+26.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-6.4%+5.5%+16.5%+3.7%+22.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+14.3%+8.3%+15.6%+18.9%+23.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+88.3%+22.1%+22.5%+2.6%+20.8%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+80.2%+4.3%+42.9%-60.0%-88.4%
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

DIOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 77.9x trailing earnings, DIOD trades at a 59% valuation discount to POWI's 187.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MTSI's 142.1x.

MetricSITM logoSITMSiTime CorporationDIOD logoDIODDiodes Incorporat…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Market CapShares × price$22.0B$5.1B$27.0B$4.1B$78.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$22.0B$4.9B$27.4B$4.0B$77.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-484.35x77.91x-492.99x187.90x125.56x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.106.11x42.65x73.25x58.74x67.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple27.09x142.12x81.32x99.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue67.32x3.46x27.91x9.20x28.18x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share17.99x2.67x20.06x6.13x21.90x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF626.05x37.37x140.00x46.85x118.03x
DIOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

MPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SITM. SITM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MTSI's 0.41x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITM scores 7/9 vs MTSI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSITM logoSITMSiTime CorporationDIOD logoDIODDiodes Incorporat…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-2.1%+4.4%+13.2%+2.4%+17.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.9%+3.5%+8.6%+2.1%+15.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-4.9%+1.6%+6.0%+2.4%+22.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-6.1%+1.7%+7.6%+2.9%+20.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976566
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.05x0.41x0.01x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$12M-$272M$426M-$59M-$1.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$17M$367M$112M$59M$1.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5M$96M$538M$0$24M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense66.87x32.37x
MPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

SITM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in SITM five years ago would be worth $99,986 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,871 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, SITM leads with a +342.0% total return vs POWI's +43.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITM at 113.9% vs POWI's -1.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSITM logoSITMSiTime CorporationDIOD logoDIODDiodes Incorporat…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+125.2%+116.6%+105.7%+97.0%+71.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+342.0%+179.0%+200.8%+43.3%+151.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+878.0%+32.2%+554.9%-4.5%+286.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+899.9%+57.4%+577.7%-1.3%+404.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+6308.3%+484.5%+836.0%+239.0%+2534.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+113.9%+9.7%+87.1%-1.5%+56.9%
SITM leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

MTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

MTSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.69 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITM's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs POWI's 89.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSITM logoSITMSiTime CorporationDIOD logoDIODDiodes Incorporat…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.48x2.08x1.69x2.11x2.27x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$845.00$117.80$364.00$81.59$1662.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$173.14$39.23$117.05$30.86$630.00
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.6%+94.6%+98.9%+89.8%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10086.873.379.161.361.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded433K546K1.1M982K578K
MTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SITM as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy", MTSI as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.8% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -25.7% for SITM (target: $619). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.14% vs MPWR's 0.37%.

MetricSITM logoSITMSiTime CorporationDIOD logoDIODDiodes Incorporat…MTSI logoMTSIMACOM Technology …POWI logoPOWIPower Integration…MPWR logoMPWRMonolithic Power …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$619.29$120.00$332.00$79.00$1615.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts913231625
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.1%+0.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10188
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.84$5.90
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.7%+0.2%+2.4%+0.0%
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).

Best OverallMonolithic Power Systems, I… (MPWR)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SITM vs DIOD vs MTSI vs POWI vs MPWR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SiTime Corporation (SITM) is the stronger pick with 61.

2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 77. 9x trailing P/E (42. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SiTime Corporation (SITM) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR?

On trailing P/E, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the cheapest at 77.

9x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 187. 9x. On forward P/E, Diodes Incorporated is actually cheaper at 42. 6x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR?

Over the past 5 years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) delivered a total return of +899.

9%, compared to -1. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITM returned +63. 1% versus POWI's +239. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 69β versus SiTime Corporation's 2. 48β — meaning SITM is approximately 47% more volatile than MTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 41% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiTime Corporation (SITM) is pulling ahead at 61.

2% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiTime Corporation grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR?

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -13. 1% for SiTime Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -18. 5% for SITM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) trades at 42.

6x forward P/E versus 106. 1x for SiTime Corporation — 63. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 7. 8% to $79. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR?

In this comparison, POWI (1.

1% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SITM, DIOD, MTSI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SITM or DIOD or MTSI or POWI or MPWR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.

(MTSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+836. 0% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 27 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTSI: +836. 0%, MPWR: +25. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SITM and DIOD and MTSI and POWI and MPWR?

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SITM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. POWI pays a dividend while SITM, DIOD, MTSI, MPWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SITM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 44%
  • Gross Margin > 33%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DIOD

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTSI

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
  • Net Margin > 9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

POWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 32%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MPWR

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 10%
  • Net Margin > 13%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SITM and DIOD and MTSI and POWI and MPWR on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SITM: 88.3% · DIOD: 22.1%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.