Semiconductors
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $21.05B | $4.00B | $77.41B | $5.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $380M | $446M | $2.79B | $1.56B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-24M | $17M | $616M | $86M |
| Gross Margin | 55.7% | 53.9% | 55.2% | 31.3% |
| Operating Margin | -12.7% | 4.6% | 26.1% | 3.5% |
| Forward P/E | 155.1x | 55.5x | 73.1x | 48.5x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $0.00 | $24M | $96M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $59M | $1.10B | $367M |
SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SiTime Corporation (SITM) | 100 | 2674.6 | +2574.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 132.6 | +32.6% |
| Monolithic Power Sy… (MPWR) | 100 | 751.4 | +651.4% |
| Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) | 100 | 231.5 | +131.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SITM has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 61.2%, EPS growth 57.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.8%
- 60.3% 10Y total return vs MPWR's 24.9%
- 61.2% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9%
- +379.7% vs POWI's +44.4%
POWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.08, current ratio 6.51x
- Beta 2.08, yield 1.2%, current ratio 6.51x
- Beta 2.08 vs SITM's 2.56
MPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is quality and efficiency.
- 22.1% margin vs SITM's -6.4%
- 15.2% ROA vs SITM's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.9%
DIOD is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (48.5x vs 73.1x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 61.2% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (48.5x vs 73.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.1% margin vs SITM's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.08 vs SITM's 2.56 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 18-year raise streak, vs MPWR's 0.4%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +379.7% vs POWI's +44.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs SITM's -1.9%, ROIC 22.2% vs -4.9% |
SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories
DIOD leads 1 • SITM leads 1 • POWI leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.8B annually — 7.3x SITM's $380M. MPWR is the more profitable business, keeping 22.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SITM's -6.4%. On growth, SITM holds the edge at +88.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $380M | $446M | $2.8B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$24M | $41M | $781M | $162M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$24M | $17M | $616M | $86M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $54M | $85M | $664M | $129M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +55.7% | +53.9% | +55.2% | +31.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.7% | +4.6% | +26.1% | +3.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -6.4% | +3.7% | +22.1% | +5.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +14.3% | +18.9% | +23.8% | +8.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +88.3% | +2.6% | +20.8% | +22.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.2% | -60.0% | -88.4% | +4.3% |
Valuation Metrics
DIOD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 78.7x trailing earnings, DIOD trades at a 57% valuation discount to POWI's 184.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DIOD's 27.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MPWR's 97.9x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21.0B | $4.0B | $77.4B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.0B | $3.9B | $76.3B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -463.55x | 184.18x | 123.60x | 78.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 155.06x | 55.51x | 73.12x | 48.48x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.19x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 79.69x | 97.90x | 27.39x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 64.43x | 9.02x | 27.74x | 3.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 17.22x | 6.01x | 21.56x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 599.17x | 45.93x | 116.20x | 37.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MPWR delivers a 17.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SITM. SITM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to DIOD's 0.05x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITM scores 7/9 vs DIOD's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.1% | +2.4% | +17.9% | +4.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.9% | +2.1% | +15.2% | +3.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -4.9% | +2.4% | +22.2% | +1.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.1% | +2.9% | +20.4% | +1.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | — | 0.01x | 0.05x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | -$59M | -$1.1B | -$272M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $59M | $1.1B | $367M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $0 | $24M | $96M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | — | 54.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SITM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SITM five years ago would be worth $87,974 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,165 for POWI. Over the past 12 months, SITM leads with a +379.7% total return vs POWI's +44.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SITM at 110.7% vs POWI's -2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +115.5% | +93.2% | +68.5% | +118.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +379.7% | +44.4% | +148.6% | +187.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +836.0% | -6.3% | +280.3% | +33.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +779.7% | -8.3% | +366.2% | +51.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +6033.2% | +232.7% | +2494.7% | +490.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +110.7% | -2.2% | +56.1% | +10.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POWI and DIOD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POWI is the less volatile stock with a 2.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SITM's 2.56 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DIOD currently trades 95.6% from its 52-week high vs POWI's 91.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.56x | 2.08x | 2.28x | 2.11x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $845.00 | $78.94 | $1662.00 | $117.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $158.63 | $30.86 | $613.00 | $37.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.4% | +91.0% | +94.8% | +95.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.9 | 76.1 | 71.0 | 80.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 967K | 577K | 533K |
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SITM as "Buy", POWI as "Buy", MPWR as "Buy", DIOD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.0% upside for POWI (target: $79) vs -45.3% for SITM (target: $436). For income investors, POWI offers the higher dividend yield at 1.17% vs MPWR's 0.37%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $436.43 | $79.00 | $1615.00 | $74.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 16 | 25 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.2% | +0.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 | $5.90 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% | +0.0% | +0.7% |
MPWR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). DIOD leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SITM vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SiTime Corporation (SITM) is the stronger pick with 61.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) offers the better valuation at 78. 7x trailing P/E (48. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SiTime Corporation (SITM) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD?
On trailing P/E, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) is the cheapest at 78.
7x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Diodes Incorporated is actually cheaper at 48. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD?
Over the past 5 years, SiTime Corporation (SITM) delivered a total return of +779.
7%, compared to -8. 3% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SITM returned +60. 3% versus POWI's +232. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 08β versus SiTime Corporation's 2. 56β — meaning SITM is approximately 23% more volatile than POWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SiTime Corporation (SITM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 5% for Diodes Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SiTime Corporation (SITM) is pulling ahead at 61.
2% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SiTime Corporation grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD?
Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.
(MPWR) is the more profitable company, earning 22. 1% net margin versus -13. 1% for SiTime Corporation — meaning it keeps 22. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MPWR leads at 26. 1% versus -18. 5% for SITM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MPWR leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Diodes Incorporated (DIOD) trades at 48.
5x forward P/E versus 155. 1x for SiTime Corporation — 106. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SITM, DIOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SITM or POWI or MPWR or DIOD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 2% yield, +232. 7% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (POWI: +232. 7%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SITM and POWI and MPWR and DIOD?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SITM is a mid-cap high-growth stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock. POWI pays a dividend while SITM, MPWR, DIOD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.