Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SKIL vs LRN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
SKIL vs LRN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $72M | $3.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $516M | $2.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $308M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | 38.3% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 15.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $589M | $550M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $782M |
SKIL vs LRN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) | 100 | 4.0 | -96.0% |
| Stride, Inc. (LRN) | 100 | 372.4 | +272.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKIL vs LRN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKIL is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Better valuation composite
LRN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.46
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs SKIL's -95.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.9% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SKIL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.46 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -42.3% vs SKIL's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.1% ROA vs SKIL's -15.0%, ROIC 22.0% vs -8.1% |
SKIL vs LRN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKIL vs LRN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LRN is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.5B annually — 4.9x SKIL's $516M. LRN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKIL's -26.0%. On growth, LRN holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $516M | $2.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $525M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $308M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $400M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.1% | +38.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.7% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SKIL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LRN's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKIL's 9.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $561M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.56x | 15.41x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 13.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.26x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 7.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 3.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.24x | 10.47x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LRN leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LRN delivers a 19.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SKIL. LRN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIL's 6.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LRN scores 7/9 vs SKIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +19.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.0% | +13.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.1% | +22.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +19.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.28x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $488M | -$233M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $782M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $589M | $550M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.69x | 36.09x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LRN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $414 for SKIL. Over the past 12 months, LRN leads with a -42.3% total return vs SKIL's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LRN at 30.5% vs SKIL's -30.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +41.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.4% | -42.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | +122.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | +223.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +666.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.1% | +30.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LRN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LRN is the less volatile stock with a 0.46 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LRN currently trades 53.6% from its 52-week high vs SKIL's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.46x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.01 | $171.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $60.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +53.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 744K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $109.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.5% |
LRN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKIL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SKIL vs LRN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKIL or LRN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Stride, Inc. (LRN) offers the better valuation at 15. 4x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Stride, Inc. (LRN) a "Hold" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SKIL or LRN?
Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) delivered a total return of +223. 1%, compared to -95. 9% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +666. 0% versus SKIL's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SKIL or LRN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 46β versus Skillsoft Corp. 's 1. 69β — meaning SKIL is approximately 265% more volatile than LRN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Stride, Inc. (LRN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 6% for Skillsoft Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SKIL or LRN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skillsoft Corp. grew EPS 65. 7% year-over-year, compared to 26. 9% for Stride, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRN leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SKIL or LRN?
Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 0% net margin versus -23. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. — meaning it keeps 12. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LRN leads at 15. 0% versus -13. 1% for SKIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKIL leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SKIL or LRN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SKIL or LRN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), +666. 0% 10Y return). Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LRN: +666. 0%, SKIL: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SKIL and LRN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKIL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.