Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $72M | $1.80B | $2.16B | $1.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $516M | $1.27B | $855M | $774M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $130M | $170M | $-64M |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | 37.4% | 51.8% | 54.8% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 14.0% | 24.3% | -11.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 11.0x | 12.0x | 15.2x |
| Total Debt | $589M | $109M | $105M | $5M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $141M | $132M | $793M |
SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 288.0 | +188.0% |
| Coursera, Inc. (COUR) | 100 | 13.9 | -86.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKIL plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
STRA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency is your priority.
- PEG 1.46 vs PRDO's 1.77
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 15.2x)
- 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.48, yield 1.6%
- 5.1% 10Y total return vs STRA's 114.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.48, Low D/E 10.8%, current ratio 5.06x
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
COUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 15.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs SKIL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.48 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs PRDO's 1.6%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +15.4% vs SKIL's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs SKIL's -15.0%, ROIC 15.3% vs -8.1% |
SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories
SKIL leads 0 • STRA leads 0 • COUR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
STRA is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 2.5x SKIL's $516M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKIL's -26.0%. On growth, COUR holds the edge at +9.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $516M | $1.3B | $855M | $774M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $216M | $247M | -$67M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $130M | $170M | -$64M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $174M | $221M | $84M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.1% | +37.4% | +51.8% | +54.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +14.0% | +24.3% | -11.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | +10.2% | +19.9% | -8.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +13.7% | +25.8% | +10.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +0.8% | +4.1% | +9.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.7% | +19.4% | +30.8% | -140.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SKIL and STRA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 2% valuation discount to STRA's 14.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.94x vs PRDO's 2.09x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $1.8B | $2.2B | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $561M | $1.8B | $2.1B | $274M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.56x | 14.59x | 14.23x | -20.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 11.01x | 12.04x | 15.19x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.94x | 2.09x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 7.22x | 8.97x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.42x | 2.55x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 1.10x | 2.34x | 1.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.24x | 11.68x | 9.97x | 9.90x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SKIL. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIL's 6.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs SKIL's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +7.9% | +17.2% | -10.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.0% | +6.2% | +13.2% | -6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.1% | +9.0% | +15.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +10.7% | +17.5% | -12.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.28x | 0.07x | 0.11x | 0.01x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $488M | -$32M | -$27M | -$788M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $141M | $132M | $793M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $589M | $109M | $105M | $5M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.69x | — | 50.21x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PRDO leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PRDO five years ago would be worth $29,850 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $414 for SKIL. Over the past 12 months, PRDO leads with a +15.4% total return vs SKIL's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs SKIL's -30.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +1.4% | +18.9% | -11.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.4% | -7.8% | +15.4% | -28.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | +3.8% | +195.8% | -44.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | +17.8% | +198.5% | -82.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +114.9% | +505.6% | -86.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.1% | +1.3% | +43.5% | -17.9% |
Risk & Volatility
PRDO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PRDO is the less volatile stock with a 0.48 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PRDO currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs SKIL's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.48x | 0.48x | 0.80x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.01 | $93.45 | $38.50 | $13.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $69.70 | $26.66 | $5.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +84.6% | +89.5% | +46.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 47.3 | 46.2 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 315K | 584K | 4.7M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STRA and PRDO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: STRA as "Buy", PRDO as "Hold", COUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for COUR (target: $8) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.19% vs PRDO's 1.62%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $87.00 | $30.00 | $7.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 18 | 9 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 5 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.52 | $0.56 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +7.7% | +5.6% | 0.0% |
PRDO leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SKIL vs STRA vs PRDO vs COUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) a "Buy" — based on 18 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Strategic Education, Inc. at 14. 6x. On forward P/E, Strategic Education, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR?
Over the past 5 years, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) delivered a total return of +198.
5%, compared to -95. 9% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +505. 6% versus SKIL's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Skillsoft Corp. 's 1. 69β — meaning SKIL is approximately 248% more volatile than PRDO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for Skillsoft Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skillsoft Corp. grew EPS 65. 7% year-over-year, compared to 10. 5% for Perdoceo Education Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COUR leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus -23. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus -13. 1% for SKIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKIL leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Perdoceo Education Corporation's 1. 77x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 15. 2x for Coursera, Inc. — 4. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COUR: 24. 2% to $7. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
2% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SKIL, COUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKIL or STRA or PRDO or COUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), 1. 6% yield, +505. 6% 10Y return). Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +505. 6%, SKIL: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKIL and STRA and PRDO and COUR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKIL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. STRA, PRDO pay a dividend while SKIL, COUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.