Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Education & Training Services
Specialty Retail
SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $72M | $1.04T | $57.36B | $1.06B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $516M | $703.06B | $106.25B | $774M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-134M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $-64M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 80.1% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 54.8% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -15.8% | 4.1% | 5.3% | -11.4% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 44.7x | 15.7x | 15.2x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $589M | $67.09B | $5.59B | $5M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $793M | $86.81B |
SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) | 100 | 4.1 | -95.9% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 287.5 | +187.5% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 63.6 | -36.4% |
| Coursera, Inc. (COUR) | 100 | 13.9 | -86.1% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 175.3 | +75.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Among these 5 stocks, SKIL doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
WMT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.12 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage
TGT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for defensive.
- Beta 0.95, yield 3.6%, current ratio 0.94x
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
COUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 9.0%, EPS growth 39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 2.51x
- Lower P/E (15.2x vs 15.7x)
AMZN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and valuation efficiency.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs WMT's 499.5%
- PEG 1.24 vs WMT's 4.06
- 12.4% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0%
- 12.2% margin vs SKIL's -26.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs SKIL's -4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.2x vs 15.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.2% margin vs SKIL's -26.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs SKIL's 1.69, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs SKIL's -55.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs SKIL's -15.0%, ROIC 14.7% vs -8.1% |
SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMZN leads in 1 of 6 categories
SKIL leads 1 • COUR leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • TGT leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 1440.1x SKIL's $516M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKIL's -26.0%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $516M | $703.1B | $106.2B | $774M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $15M | $42.8B | $8.7B | -$67M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$134M | $22.9B | $4.0B | -$64M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $84M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +80.1% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +54.8% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.8% | +4.1% | +5.3% | -11.4% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -26.0% | +3.3% | +3.8% | -8.2% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +1.2% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +10.8% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.0% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +9.1% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -65.7% | +35.1% | +23.7% | -140.0% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SKIL leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, TGT trades at a 68% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), AMZN offers better value at 1.35x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $72M | $1.04T | $57.4B | $1.1B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $561M | $1.09T | $57.5B | $274M | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.56x | 47.69x | 15.49x | -20.23x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 44.71x | 15.74x | 15.19x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 4.33x | — | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.19x | 24.85x | 7.26x | — | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.14x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 1.40x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.72x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 1.62x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 6.24x | 24.97x | 20.23x | 9.90x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
COUR leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $-34 for SKIL. COUR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKIL's 6.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), WMT scores 6/9 vs SKIL's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -33.7% | +22.3% | +26.1% | -10.1% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.0% | +7.9% | +6.9% | -6.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.1% | +14.7% | +16.7% | — | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -8.8% | +17.5% | +13.6% | -12.6% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.28x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.01x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $488M | $56.4B | $104M | -$788M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $793M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $589M | $67.1B | $5.6B | $5M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.69x | 11.85x | 12.40x | — | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WMT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WMT five years ago would be worth $28,695 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $414 for SKIL. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs SKIL's -55.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WMT at 37.6% vs SKIL's -30.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.7% | +15.7% | +26.4% | -11.4% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -55.4% | +32.7% | +36.6% | -28.5% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -65.8% | +160.5% | -11.0% | -44.6% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | +186.9% | -31.6% | -82.7% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.8% | +499.5% | +99.5% | -86.1% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.1% | +37.6% | -3.8% | -17.9% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKIL's 1.69 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs SKIL's 34.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.69x | 0.12x | 0.95x | 0.80x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.01 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $13.56 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.44 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $5.00 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.4% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +46.2% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.8 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 50.4 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 159K | 17.2M | 4.5M | 4.7M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", COUR as "Buy", AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 24.2% upside for COUR (target: $8) vs -8.4% for TGT (target: $115). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $137.04 | $115.31 | $7.79 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 64 | 59 | 17 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +3.6% | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 37 | 22 | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.6% | +0.8% | +0.7% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SKIL leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SKIL vs WMT vs TGT vs COUR vs AMZN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Target Corporation (TGT) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Target Corporation (TGT) is the cheapest at 15.
5x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Coursera, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Amazon. com, Inc. wins at 1. 24x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) delivered a total return of +186. 9%, compared to -95. 9% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus SKIL's -95. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Skillsoft Corp. 's 1. 69β — meaning SKIL is approximately 1344% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 6% for Skillsoft Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus -4. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Skillsoft Corp. grew EPS 65. 7% year-over-year, compared to -8. 2% for Target Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, COUR leads at 13. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -23. 0% for Skillsoft Corp. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -13. 1% for SKIL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKIL leads at 74. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 24x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Coursera, Inc. (COUR) trades at 15. 2x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 29. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for COUR: 24. 2% to $7. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. SKIL, COUR, AMZN do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SKIL or WMT or TGT or COUR or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Skillsoft Corp. (SKIL) carries a higher beta of 1. 69 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, SKIL: -95. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKIL and WMT and TGT and COUR and AMZN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SKIL (Consumer Defensive) and WMT (Consumer Defensive) and TGT (Consumer Defensive) and COUR (Consumer Defensive) and AMZN (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SKIL is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; COUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMZN is a mega-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, TGT pay a dividend while SKIL, COUR, AMZN do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.