Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SKM vs VIV

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • KR
Market Cap$14.15B
5Y Perf.+93.2%
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNYSE • BR
Market Cap$25.45B
5Y Perf.+81.6%

SKM vs VIV — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SKM logoSKM
VIV logoVIV
IndustryTelecommunications ServicesTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$14.15B$25.45B
Revenue (TTM)$17.84T$59.83B
Net Income (TTM)$1.01T$6.20B
Gross Margin90.2%43.6%
Operating Margin8.7%15.8%
Forward P/E0.0x2.9x
Total Debt$10.76T$20.75B
Cash & Equiv.$2.02T$6.69B

SKM vs VIVLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SKM
VIV
StockMay 20May 26Return
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM)100193.2+93.2%
Telefônica Brasil S… (VIV)100181.6+81.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SKM vs VIV

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SKM leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. Telefônica Brasil S.A. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SKM
SK Telecom Co.,Ltd
The Income Pick

SKM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 3.9%
  • 239.6% 10Y total return vs VIV's 81.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 91.0%, current ratio 0.81x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
VIV
Telefônica Brasil S.A.
The Growth Play

VIV is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 7.2%, EPS growth 11.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.2%
  • 7.2% revenue growth vs SKM's 1.9%
  • 10.4% margin vs SKM's 5.7%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthVIV logoVIV7.2% revenue growth vs SKM's 1.9%
ValueSKM logoSKMLower P/E (0.0x vs 2.9x), PEG 0.00 vs 1.07
Quality / MarginsVIV logoVIV10.4% margin vs SKM's 5.7%
Stability / SafetySKM logoSKMBeta 0.34 vs VIV's 0.53
DividendsSKM logoSKM3.9% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs VIV's 2.0%
Momentum (1Y)SKM logoSKM+72.3% vs VIV's +65.9%
Efficiency (ROA)VIV logoVIV4.8% ROA vs SKM's 3.5%, ROIC 7.8% vs 6.0%

SKM vs VIV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SKMSK Telecom Co.,Ltd

Segment breakdown not available.

VIVTelefônica Brasil S.A.
FY 2025
Services
90.0%$74.1B
Sale Of Goods
10.0%$8.3B

SKM vs VIV — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLSKMLAGGINGVIV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

VIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

SKM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.84T annually — 298.1x VIV's $59.8B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 10.4% (VIV) to 5.7% (SKM). On growth, VIV holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$17.84T$59.8B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$5.20T$24.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$1.01T$6.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.07T$11.3B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.2%+43.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+8.7%+15.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+5.7%+10.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+17.2%+18.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-1.9%+8.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-75.7%+11.1%
VIV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SKM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 16.8x trailing earnings, SKM trades at a 28% valuation discount to VIV's 23.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SKM offers better value at 2.21x vs VIV's 8.65x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…
Market CapShares × price$14.2B$25.5B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$20.2B$28.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS16.78x23.27x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.0.01x2.88x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.21x8.65x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.44x6.11x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.15x2.25x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.77x1.85x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.15x11.91x
SKM leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

VIV leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

VIV delivers a 9.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $8 for SKM. VIV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.30x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKM's 0.91x.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+8.5%+9.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+3.5%+4.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.0%+7.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.6%+8.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–977
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.91x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$8.74T$14.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$2.02T$6.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$10.76T$20.7B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense3.87x15.03x
VIV leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in VIV five years ago would be worth $21,694 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $20,270 for SKM. Over the past 12 months, SKM leads with a +72.3% total return vs VIV's +65.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors VIV at 28.0% vs SKM's 24.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+79.5%+32.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+72.3%+65.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+95.0%+109.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+102.7%+116.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+239.6%+81.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+24.9%+28.0%
Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SKM is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VIV's 0.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.34x0.53x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$40.46$17.25
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.66$9.41
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+91.2%+92.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10062.953.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.7M968K
Evenly matched — SKM and VIV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates SKM as "Hold" and VIV as "Hold". For income investors, SKM offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs VIV's 1.96%.

MetricSKM logoSKMSK Telecom Co.,LtdVIV logoVIVTelefônica Brasil…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$16.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts712
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.9%+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises10
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$2118.12$1.54
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.1%+2.2%
SKM leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

VIV leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SKM leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 2 tied.

Best OverallSK Telecom Co.,Ltd (SKM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SKM vs VIV: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SKM or VIV a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Telefônica Brasil S.

A. (VIV) is the stronger pick with 7. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) offers the better valuation at 16. 8x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) a "Hold" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SKM or VIV?

On trailing P/E, SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the cheapest at 16. 8x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. at 23. 3x. On forward P/E, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd wins at 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SKM or VIV?

Over the past 5 years, Telefônica Brasil S.

A. (VIV) delivered a total return of +116. 9%, compared to +102. 7% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKM returned +239. 6% versus VIV's +81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SKM or VIV?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 0. 53β — meaning VIV is approximately 58% more volatile than SKM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Telefônica Brasil S. A. (VIV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 30% versus 91% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SKM or VIV?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Telefônica Brasil S.

A. (VIV) is pulling ahead at 7. 2% versus 1. 9% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd grew EPS 16. 3% year-over-year, compared to 11. 6% for Telefônica Brasil S. A.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VIV leads at 8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SKM or VIV?

Telefônica Brasil S.

A. (VIV) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 9% net margin versus 7. 0% for SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd — meaning it keeps 9. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VIV leads at 15. 5% versus 9. 4% for SKM. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SKM leads at 87. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SKM or VIV more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Telefônica Brasil S. A. 's 1. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 2. 9x for Telefônica Brasil S. A. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SKM or VIV?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

SK Telecom Co. ,Ltd (SKM) offers the highest yield at 3. 9%, versus 2. 0% for Telefônica Brasil S. A. (VIV).

09

Is SKM or VIV better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, SK Telecom Co.

,Ltd (SKM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 34), 3. 9% yield, +239. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKM: +239. 6%, VIV: +81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SKM and VIV?

Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SKM is a mid-cap deep-value stock; VIV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

SKM

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

VIV

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Communication Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SKM and VIV on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SKM: -1.9% · VIV: 8.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(SKM: 5.7% · VIV: 10.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SKM: 16.8x · VIV: 23.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.