Aerospace & Defense
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Aerospace & Defense
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
Aerospace & Defense
SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense | Airlines, Airports & Air Services | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $419M | $8.40B | $10.68B | $9.83B | $4.67B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $24M | $1.61B | $1.42B | $78M | $300K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $-224M | $29M | $-957M | $-618M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 21.8% | 18.3% | 11.2% | — |
| Operating Margin | -87.5% | -8.3% | 1.8% | -10.2% | -2431.0% |
| Forward P/E | 110.7x | 58.4x | 73.5x | — | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $64M | $180M | $61M | $42M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $21M | $41M | $561M | $241M | $1.02B |
SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sky Harbour Group C… (SKYH) | 100 | 98.1 | -1.9% |
| AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) | 100 | 193.7 | +93.7% |
| Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS) | 100 | 211.0 | +111.0% |
| Joby Aviation, Inc. (JOBY) | 100 | 94.0 | -6.0% |
| Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SKYH is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and growth exposure is your priority.
- beta 1.12
- Rev growth 86.6%, EPS growth 105.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 146.2%
- Beta 1.12 vs ACHR's 2.96
AVAV ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.
- Better valuation composite
KTOS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 12.3% 10Y total return vs AVAV's 498.3%
- 2.1% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K%
- +58.1% vs ACHR's -26.6%
- 1.0% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 1.4% vs -54.7%
JOBY is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.70, Low D/E 4.3%, current ratio 24.09x
- Beta 2.70, current ratio 24.09x
- 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8%
Among these 5 stocks, ACHR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 391.8% revenue growth vs ACHR's -13.8% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.1% margin vs ACHR's -2.1K% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.12 vs ACHR's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +58.1% vs ACHR's -26.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs JOBY's -52.1%, ROIC 1.4% vs -54.7% |
SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
KTOS leads in 2 of 6 categories
SKYH leads 1 • AVAV leads 0 • JOBY leads 0 • ACHR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KTOS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AVAV is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.6B annually — 5367.6x ACHR's $300,000. KTOS is the more profitable business, keeping 2.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ACHR's -2060.7%. On growth, AVAV holds the edge at +143.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $24M | $1.6B | $1.4B | $78M | $300,000 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$16M | $82M | $72M | -$759M | -$709M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | -$224M | $29M | -$957M | -$618M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$99M | -$183M | -$133M | -$661M | -$512M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +21.8% | +18.3% | +11.2% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -87.5% | -8.3% | +1.8% | -10.2% | -2431.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.8% | -13.9% | +2.1% | -12.3% | -2060.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | -11.3% | -9.4% | -8.5% | -1705.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.2% | +143.4% | +22.6% | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | -51.5% | +133.3% | -9.1% | +43.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SKYH and AVAV and KTOS and JOBY and ACHR each lead in 1 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 108.5x trailing earnings, AVAV trades at a 75% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SKYH's 50.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KTOS's 118.4x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $8.4B | $10.7B | $9.8B | $4.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $398M | $8.4B | $10.3B | $9.6B | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 110.67x | 108.50x | 438.46x | -8.85x | -6.34x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 58.41x | 73.49x | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 50.41x | 102.96x | 118.42x | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 15.21x | 10.23x | 7.93x | 183.94x | 9999.00x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.50x | 5.34x | 4.94x | 5.86x | 1.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — KTOS and ACHR each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KTOS delivers a 1.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-74 for JOBY. ACHR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to KTOS's 0.09x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACHR scores 5/9 vs JOBY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | -6.4% | +1.3% | -74.2% | -37.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | -5.0% | +1.0% | -52.1% | -32.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.4% | +3.6% | +1.4% | -54.7% | -89.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.3% | +4.5% | +1.5% | -49.8% | -44.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.07x | 0.09x | 0.04x | 0.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$21M | $23M | -$381M | -$180M | -$979M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $21M | $41M | $561M | $241M | $1.0B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $64M | $180M | $61M | $42M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.43x | -5.99x | 6.16x | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KTOS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in KTOS five years ago would be worth $21,025 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,369 for ACHR. Over the past 12 months, KTOS leads with a +58.1% total return vs ACHR's -26.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KTOS at 62.8% vs AVAV's 17.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.8% | -34.4% | -28.1% | -30.4% | -22.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -11.1% | +5.1% | +58.1% | +55.7% | -26.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.4% | +63.1% | +331.5% | +128.7% | +193.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.0% | +53.7% | +110.3% | +1.0% | -36.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.1% | +498.3% | +1231.8% | -4.8% | -37.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.6% | +17.7% | +62.8% | +31.8% | +43.2% |
Risk & Volatility
SKYH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SKYH is the less volatile stock with a 1.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACHR's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKYH currently trades 78.6% from its 52-week high vs AVAV's 40.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.55x | 1.87x | 2.84x | 2.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.67 | $417.86 | $134.00 | $20.95 | $14.62 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.22 | $155.69 | $32.85 | $6.32 | $4.80 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.6% | +40.2% | +42.5% | +47.7% | +43.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 39.8 | 38.8 | 65.5 | 61.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 131K | 1.7M | 4.3M | 24.7M | 27.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SKYH as "Buy", AVAV as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy", JOBY as "Hold", ACHR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 104.3% upside for AVAV (target: $344) vs 45.6% for SKYH (target: $15).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $343.60 | $110.58 | $15.90 | $12.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 28 | 22 | 8 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
KTOS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). SKYH leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
SKYH vs AVAV vs KTOS vs JOBY vs ACHR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is the stronger pick with 391. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 14. 5% for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) offers the better valuation at 108. 5x trailing P/E (58. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR?
On trailing P/E, AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) is the cheapest at 108. 5x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, AeroVironment, Inc. is actually cheaper at 58. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR?
Over the past 5 years, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) delivered a total return of +110. 3%, compared to -36. 3% for Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1253% versus ACHR's -35. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
08β versus Archer Aviation Inc. 's 2. 95β — meaning ACHR is approximately 172% more volatile than SKYH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 9% for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Joby Aviation, Inc.
(JOBY) is pulling ahead at 391. 8% versus 14. 5% for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sky Harbour Group Corporation grew EPS 105. 1% year-over-year, compared to -29. 9% for Joby Aviation, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKYH leads at 146. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR?
Sky Harbour Group Corporation (SKYH) is the more profitable company, earning 68.
3% net margin versus -2060. 7% for Archer Aviation Inc. — meaning it keeps 68. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SKYH leads at 5. 8% versus -2431. 0% for ACHR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVAV leads at 39. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, AeroVironment, Inc.
(AVAV) trades at 58. 4x forward P/E versus 73. 5x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVAV: 104. 3% to $343. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SKYH or AVAV or KTOS or JOBY or ACHR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
(KTOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1253% 10Y return). Archer Aviation Inc. (ACHR) carries a higher beta of 2. 95 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (KTOS: +1253%, ACHR: -35. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SKYH and AVAV and KTOS and JOBY and ACHR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SKYH is a small-cap high-growth stock; AVAV is a small-cap quality compounder stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; JOBY is a small-cap high-growth stock; ACHR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.