REIT - Office
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLG vs HIW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
REIT - Office
SLG vs HIW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Office | REIT - Office |
| Market Cap | $3.11B | $2.77B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $981M | $820M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-88M | $93M |
| Gross Margin | 58.2% | 67.4% |
| Operating Margin | 42.7% | 25.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 38.9x |
| Total Debt | $7.91B | $3.64B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $336M | $27M |
SLG vs HIW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SL Green Realty Cor… (SLG) | 100 | 97.9 | -2.1% |
| Highwoods Propertie… (HIW) | 100 | 65.6 | -34.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLG vs HIW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.20
- Rev growth 42.0%, EPS growth -21.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.2%
- 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4%
HIW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- -6.0% 10Y total return vs SLG's -26.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.76, current ratio 42.45x
- Beta 0.76, yield 7.8%, current ratio 42.45x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 42.0% FFO/revenue growth vs HIW's -2.4% | |
| Quality / Margins | 11.4% margin vs SLG's -9.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.76 vs SLG's 1.20, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.8% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -7.2% vs SLG's -15.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.5% ROA vs SLG's -0.8%, ROIC 2.7% vs 1.1% |
SLG vs HIW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLG vs HIW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HIW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLG and HIW operate at a comparable scale, with $981M and $820M in trailing revenue. HIW is the more profitable business, keeping 11.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLG's -9.0%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $981M | $820M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $678M | $511M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$88M | $93M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $28M | $318M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.2% | +67.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +42.7% | +25.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -9.0% | +11.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +38.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.2% | +6.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.2% | -67.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SLG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HIW's 12.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLG's 26.1x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.1B | $2.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10.7B | $6.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -27.51x | 17.31x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 38.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 26.07x | 12.64x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.10x | 3.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.71x | 1.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 16.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HIW delivers a 3.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $4 in annual profit, vs $-2 for SLG. HIW carries lower financial leverage with a 1.49x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLG's 1.82x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HIW scores 6/9 vs SLG's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.0% | +3.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.8% | +1.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.1% | +2.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.5% | +3.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.82x | 1.49x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $7.6B | $3.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $336M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7.9B | $3.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SLG and HIW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLG five years ago would be worth $8,443 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,031 for HIW. Over the past 12 months, HIW leads with a -7.2% total return vs SLG's -15.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLG at 32.3% vs HIW's 11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -5.5% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -15.7% | -7.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +131.4% | +39.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -15.6% | -19.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.9% | -6.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +32.3% | +11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
HIW leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HIW is the less volatile stock with a 0.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLG's 1.20 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HIW currently trades 76.6% from its 52-week high vs SLG's 65.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.20x | 0.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $66.91 | $32.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $34.77 | $20.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.4% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLG as "Hold" and HIW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 15.4% upside for SLG (target: $50) vs 7.6% for HIW (target: $27). HIW is the only dividend payer here at 7.81% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $50.46 | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 31 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +7.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.96 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
HIW leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLG leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLG vs HIW: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLG or HIW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is the stronger pick with 42. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) offers the better valuation at 17. 3x trailing P/E (38. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SL Green Realty Corp. (SLG) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLG or HIW?
Over the past 5 years, SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) delivered a total return of -15. 6%, compared to -19. 7% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HIW returned -6. 0% versus SLG's -26. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLG or HIW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 76β versus SL Green Realty Corp. 's 1. 20β — meaning SLG is approximately 59% more volatile than HIW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 149% versus 182% for SL Green Realty Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLG or HIW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SL Green Realty Corp.
(SLG) is pulling ahead at 42. 0% versus -2. 4% for Highwoods Properties, Inc. (HIW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Highwoods Properties, Inc. grew EPS 54. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for SL Green Realty Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLG leads at 5. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLG or HIW?
Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 8% net margin versus -8. 8% for SL Green Realty Corp. — meaning it keeps 19. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HIW leads at 26. 0% versus 15. 4% for SLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — HIW leads at 67. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLG or HIW more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLG: 15.
4% to $50. 46.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLG or HIW?
In this comparison, HIW (7.
8% yield) pays a dividend. SLG does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SLG or HIW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Highwoods Properties, Inc.
(HIW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 76), 7. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HIW: -6. 0%, SLG: -26. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLG and HIW?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLG is a small-cap high-growth stock; HIW is a small-cap deep-value stock. HIW pays a dividend while SLG does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.