Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLND vs MYRG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
SLND vs MYRG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $55M | $7.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $935M | $3.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-94M | $142M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 11.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 5.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 46.8x |
| Total Debt | $321M | $104M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $72M | $150M |
SLND vs MYRG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Dec 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Southland Holdings,… (SLND) | 100 | 10.3 | -89.7% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 411.4 | +311.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLND vs MYRG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLND is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.53
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.42x
- Beta 0.53, current ratio 1.42x
MYRG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 8.8%, EPS growth 311.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
- 17.9% 10Y total return vs SLND's -89.5%
- 8.8% revenue growth vs SLND's -15.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.8% revenue growth vs SLND's -15.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs SLND's -10.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs MYRG's 1.70 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +197.4% vs SLND's -68.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.7% ROA vs SLND's -8.0%, ROIC 18.3% vs -19.8% |
SLND vs MYRG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLND vs MYRG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MYRG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MYRG is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.8B annually — 4.1x SLND's $935M. MYRG is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLND's -10.1%. On growth, SLND holds the edge at +23.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $935M | $3.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $261M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$94M | $142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $231M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +11.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +5.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.1% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -0.9% | +6.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.1% | +20.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.2% | +106.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SLND leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $7.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $304M | $7.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.47x | 60.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 46.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.62x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 30.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.06x | 1.94x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.28x | 10.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $-63 for SLND. MYRG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLND's 1.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs SLND's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -62.8% | +22.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -8.0% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -19.8% | +18.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -21.1% | +19.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.83x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $249M | -$47M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $72M | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $321M | $104M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.34x | 39.49x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MYRG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MYRG five years ago would be worth $54,972 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,046 for SLND. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +197.4% total return vs SLND's -68.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MYRG at 50.4% vs SLND's -46.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -66.9% | +100.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -68.5% | +197.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.8% | +240.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +449.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | +1794.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -46.7% | +50.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SLND and MYRG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLND is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MYRG's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MYRG currently trades 95.7% from its 52-week high vs SLND's 19.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.53x | 1.70x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.34 | $475.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.65 | $151.34 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.1% | +95.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.7 | 87.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 399K | 300K |
Analyst Outlook
MYRG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $362.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
MYRG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLND leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
SLND vs MYRG: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLND or MYRG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger pick with 8. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) offers the better valuation at 60. 4x trailing P/E (46. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) a "Hold" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLND or MYRG?
Over the past 5 years, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) delivered a total return of +449. 7%, compared to -89. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MYRG returned +1794% versus SLND's -89. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLND or MYRG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Southland Holdings, Inc.
(SLND) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 53β versus MYR Group Inc. 's 1. 70β — meaning MYRG is approximately 218% more volatile than SLND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 183% for Southland Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLND or MYRG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is pulling ahead at 8. 8% versus -15. 5% for Southland Holdings, Inc. (SLND). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -436. 0% for Southland Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MYRG leads at 6. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLND or MYRG?
MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 2% net margin versus -10. 7% for Southland Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MYRG leads at 4. 4% versus -12. 9% for SLND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MYRG leads at 11. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SLND or MYRG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SLND or MYRG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MYR Group Inc.
(MYRG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+1794% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MYRG: +1794%, SLND: -89. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SLND and MYRG?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.