Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLNH vs NEE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Regulated Electric
SLNH vs NEE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Regulated Electric |
| Market Cap | $97M | $194.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $29M | $27.93B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-79M | $8.18B |
| Gross Margin | 30.5% | 47.8% |
| Operating Margin | -173.9% | 29.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 23.1x |
| Total Debt | $22M | $95.62B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $2.81B |
SLNH vs NEE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soluna Holdings, In… (SLNH) | 100 | 9.7 | -90.3% |
| NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) | 100 | 146.1 | +46.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLNH vs NEE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLNH is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 80.5%, EPS growth 97.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 38.4%
- 80.5% revenue growth vs NEE's 11.0%
- +118.4% vs NEE's +42.0%
NEE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 2.4%
- 266.0% 10Y total return vs SLNH's -44.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.21, current ratio 0.60x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 80.5% revenue growth vs NEE's 11.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 29.3% margin vs SLNH's -274.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs SLNH's 4.01 | |
| Dividends | 2.4% yield; 30-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +118.4% vs NEE's +42.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.9% ROA vs SLNH's -51.9%, ROIC 4.1% vs -65.9% |
SLNH vs NEE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLNH vs NEE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NEE is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.9B annually — 970.4x SLNH's $29M. NEE is the more profitable business, keeping 29.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLNH's -2.7%. On growth, SLNH holds the edge at +11.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $29M | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$34M | $15.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$79M | $8.2B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$33M | -$3.8B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.5% | +47.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -173.9% | +29.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | +29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -113.9% | -13.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.8% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.6% | +160.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SLNH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $194.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $111M | $287.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.90x | 28.36x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 23.07x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.64x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 18.73x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.56x | 7.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.49x | 2.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NEE delivers a 12.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $-107 for SLNH. SLNH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.80x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NEE's 1.44x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NEE scores 5/9 vs SLNH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -107.4% | +12.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -51.9% | +3.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -65.9% | +4.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -92.0% | +4.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.80x | 1.44x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $92.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $2.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $22M | $95.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -19.07x | 1.99x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NEE leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NEE five years ago would be worth $13,819 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for SLNH. Over the past 12 months, SLNH leads with a +118.4% total return vs NEE's +42.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NEE at 9.4% vs SLNH's -32.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.8% | +16.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +118.4% | +42.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.6% | +31.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +38.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | +266.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -32.8% | +9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
NEE leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NEE is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLNH's 4.01 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NEE currently trades 94.5% from its 52-week high vs SLNH's 29.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 4.01x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.14 | $98.75 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.41 | $63.88 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.6% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.4 | 54.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 10.8M | 8.7M |
Analyst Outlook
NEE leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SLNH as "Buy" and NEE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 228.9% upside for SLNH (target: $5) vs 5.2% for NEE (target: $98). NEE is the only dividend payer here at 2.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.00 | $98.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $2.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NEE leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SLNH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
SLNH vs NEE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLNH or NEE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Soluna Holdings, Inc.
(SLNH) is the stronger pick with 80. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 0% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE) offers the better valuation at 28. 4x trailing P/E (23. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLNH or NEE?
Over the past 5 years, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) delivered a total return of +38. 2%, compared to -99. 2% for Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NEE returned +266. 0% versus SLNH's -44. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLNH or NEE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Soluna Holdings, Inc. 's 4. 01β — meaning SLNH is approximately 1835% more volatile than NEE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 80% versus 144% for NextEra Energy, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SLNH or NEE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Soluna Holdings, Inc.
(SLNH) is pulling ahead at 80. 5% versus 11. 0% for NextEra Energy, Inc. (NEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Soluna Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 97. 1% year-over-year, compared to -2. 4% for NextEra Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLNH leads at 38. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SLNH or NEE?
NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 9% net margin versus -166. 6% for Soluna Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NEE leads at 30. 1% versus -125. 0% for SLNH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NEE leads at 62. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SLNH or NEE more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SLNH: 228.
9% to $5. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLNH or NEE?
In this comparison, NEE (2.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SLNH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SLNH or NEE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NextEra Energy, Inc.
(NEE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 2. 4% yield, +266. 0% 10Y return). Soluna Holdings, Inc. (SLNH) carries a higher beta of 4. 01 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NEE: +266. 0%, SLNH: -44. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLNH and NEE?
These companies operate in different sectors (SLNH (Technology) and NEE (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SLNH is a small-cap high-growth stock; NEE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. NEE pays a dividend while SLNH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.