Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN) vs Coty Inc. (COTY) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SLSN | 40.4% revenue growth vs COTY's -3.7% |
| Value | COTY | Lower P/E (8.4x vs 18.3x) |
| Quality / Margins | SLSN | 1.7% net margin vs COTY's -9.2% |
| Stability / Safety | COTY | Beta 1.09 vs SLSN's 1.25 |
| Dividends | COTY | 0.6% yield; 1-year raise streak; SLSN pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SLSN | -54.8% vs COTY's -55.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SLSN | 2.0% ROA vs COTY's -4.8%, ROIC 15.3% vs 2.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Solésence is a developer and manufacturer of mineral-based skincare and makeup products that provide environmental protection. It generates revenue primarily through contract manufacturing and technology licensing for global and indie beauty brands — leveraging its proprietary Active Stress Defense™ technology platform. The company's competitive advantage lies in its patented mineral-based formulations that offer clean, inclusive sun protection and anti-pollution benefits.
Coty is a global beauty company that manufactures and sells prestige fragrances, cosmetics, and skincare products. It generates revenue through two main segments: prestige beauty (approximately 60% of sales) sold through department stores and specialty retailers, and consumer beauty (around 40%) sold through mass-market channels like drugstores and supermarkets. The company's key advantage lies in its extensive portfolio of licensed prestige brands — including Gucci, Burberry, and Calvin Klein — which provides strong brand recognition and distribution leverage.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
COTY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). SLSN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
COTY is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.8B annually — 93.4x SLSN's $62M. SLSN is the more profitable business, keeping 1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to COTY's -9.2%. On growth, COTY holds the edge at +0.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SLSNSolesence, Inc. C… | COTYCoty Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $5.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $373M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$534M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $394M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +63.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | -9.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.0% | +6.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.5% | +0.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.0% | -7.0% |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, COTY's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLSN's 17.2x.
| Metric | SLSNSolesence, Inc. C… | COTYCoty Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $90M | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $104M | $6.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.29x | -5.70x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 8.44x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.19x | 9.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.72x | 0.37x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.57x | 0.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLSN delivers a 6.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-14 for COTY. SLSN carries lower financial leverage with a 1.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to COTY's 1.07x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLSN scores 6/9 vs COTY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SLSNSolesence, Inc. C… | COTYCoty Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | -14.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | -4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +2.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.7% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 1.07x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $257M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $4.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.37x | -1.24x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in SLSN five years ago would be worth $14,222 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,110 for COTY. Over the past 12 months, SLSN leads with a -54.8% total return vs COTY's -55.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLSN at -3.6% vs COTY's -39.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SLSNSolesence, Inc. C… | COTYCoty Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.7% | -19.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.8% | -55.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -10.5% | -77.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +42.2% | -68.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +204.8% | -84.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -3.6% | -39.4% |
Risk & Volatility
COTY is the less volatile stock with a 1.09 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLSN's 1.25 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. COTY currently trades 40.9% from its 52-week high vs SLSN's 7.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SLSNSolesence, Inc. C… | COTYCoty Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.25x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $16.56 | $6.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.15 | $2.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.7% | +40.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 45.2 | 40.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 28K | 7.4M |
Analyst Outlook
COTY is the only dividend payer here at 0.61% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | SLSNSolesence, Inc. C… | COTYCoty Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $4.07 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solesence, Inc. Com… (SLSN) | 100 | 548.15 | +448.1% |
| Coty Inc. (COTY) | 100 | 34.84 | -65.2% |
Solesence, Inc. Com… (SLSN) returned +42% over 5 years vs Coty Inc. (COTY)'s -69%. A $10,000 investment in SLSN 5 years ago would be worth $14,222 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solesence, Inc. Com… (SLSN) | $29M | $52M | +77.6% |
| Coty Inc. (COTY) | $4.3B | $5.9B | +35.5% |
Coty Inc.'s revenue grew from $4.3B (2016) to $5.9B (2025) — a 3.4% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solesence, Inc. Com… (SLSN) | 7.9% | 8.1% | +2.8% |
| Coty Inc. (COTY) | 3.6% | -6.2% | -273.1% |
Coty Inc.'s net margin went from 4% (2016) to -6% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 3 Years
| Stock | 2022 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coty Inc. (COTY) | 27.6 | 80.6 | +192.0% |
Coty Inc. has traded in a 22x–81x P/E range over 3 years; current trailing P/E is ~-6x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solesence, Inc. Com… (SLSN) | 0.05 | 0.07 | +40.0% |
| Coty Inc. (COTY) | 0.44 | -0.44 | -200.0% |
Coty Inc.'s EPS grew from $0.44 (2016) to $-0.44 (2025) — a NaN% CAGR.
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Solesence, Inc. Common Stock generated $-3M FCF in 2024 (-679% vs 2021). Coty Inc. generated $278M FCF in 2025 (+92% vs 2021).
SLSN vs COTY: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLSN or COTY a better buy right now?
Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN) offers the better valuation at 18.3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coty Inc. (COTY) a "Hold" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SLSN or COTY?
Over the past 5 years, Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN) delivered a total return of +42.2%, compared to -68.9% for Coty Inc. (COTY). A $10,000 investment in SLSN five years ago would be worth approximately $14K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLSN returned +204.8% versus COTY's -84.1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SLSN or COTY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Coty Inc. (COTY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.09β versus Solesence, Inc. Common Stock's 1.25β — meaning SLSN is approximately 14% more volatile than COTY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 102% versus 107% for Coty Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — SLSN or COTY?
Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN) is the more profitable company, earning 8.1% net margin versus -6.2% for Coty Inc. — meaning it keeps 8.1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLSN leads at 9.8% versus 4.1% for COTY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — COTY leads at 64.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — SLSN or COTY?
In this comparison, COTY (0.6% yield) pays a dividend. SLSN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is SLSN or COTY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Coty Inc. (COTY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.09), 0.6% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (COTY: -84.1%, SLSN: +204.8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between SLSN and COTY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. COTY pays a dividend while SLSN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.