Household & Personal Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SLSN vs IPAR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
SLSN vs IPAR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Household & Personal Products | Household & Personal Products |
| Market Cap | $92M | $3.01B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $1.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $201M |
| Gross Margin | 24.8% | 64.0% |
| Operating Margin | 1.9% | 18.0% |
| Forward P/E | 18.6x | 19.4x |
| Total Debt | $15M | $224M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $158M |
SLSN vs IPAR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solesence, Inc. Com… (SLSN) | 100 | 288.9 | +188.9% |
| Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) | 100 | 202.5 | +102.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SLSN vs IPAR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SLSN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.4%, EPS growth 179.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 21.1%
- 40.4% revenue growth vs IPAR's 2.5%
- Lower P/E (18.6x vs 19.4x)
IPAR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.54, yield 3.4%
- 255.2% 10Y total return vs SLSN's 160.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.54, Low D/E 20.3%, current ratio 2.99x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.4% revenue growth vs IPAR's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.6x vs 19.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.5% margin vs SLSN's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.54 vs SLSN's 2.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.4% yield; 5-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -18.8% vs SLSN's -57.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.9% ROA vs SLSN's 2.0%, ROIC 18.6% vs 15.3% |
SLSN vs IPAR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SLSN vs IPAR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPAR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IPAR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.5B annually — 24.0x SLSN's $62M. IPAR is the more profitable business, keeping 13.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SLSN's 1.7%. On growth, IPAR holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $291M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $201M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$11M | $199M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +64.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.9% | +18.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +13.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -18.0% | +13.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -13.5% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -150.0% | +2.3% |
Valuation Metrics
IPAR leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.9x trailing earnings, IPAR trades at a 3% valuation discount to SLSN's 18.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, IPAR's 11.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SLSN's 17.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $92M | $3.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $106M | $3.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.57x | 17.93x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.53x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.42x | 11.33x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.75x | 2.02x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.66x | 2.74x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 15.80x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IPAR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IPAR delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $6 for SLSN. IPAR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.20x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SLSN's 1.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SLSN scores 6/9 vs IPAR's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.2% | +18.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +15.3% | +18.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.7% | +23.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.20x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14M | $66M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $158M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $15M | $224M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.37x | 50.40x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IPAR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IPAR five years ago would be worth $14,188 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,701 for SLSN. Over the past 12 months, IPAR leads with a -18.8% total return vs SLSN's -57.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLSN at 22.9% vs IPAR's -12.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.3% | +10.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -57.2% | -18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +85.7% | -32.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.0% | +41.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +160.0% | +255.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +22.9% | -12.4% |
Risk & Volatility
IPAR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IPAR is the less volatile stock with a 0.54 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLSN's 2.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IPAR currently trades 65.9% from its 52-week high vs SLSN's 23.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.02x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.63 | $142.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.78 | $77.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.1% | +65.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.7 | 55.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 37K | 259K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
IPAR is the only dividend payer here at 3.40% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $107.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $3.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.5% |
IPAR leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
SLSN vs IPAR: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SLSN or IPAR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Solesence, Inc.
Common Stock (SLSN) is the stronger pick with 40. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR). Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) offers the better valuation at 17. 9x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) a "Hold" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SLSN or IPAR?
On trailing P/E, Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the cheapest at 17. 9x versus Solesence, Inc. Common Stock at 18. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SLSN or IPAR?
Over the past 5 years, Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) delivered a total return of +41. 9%, compared to -3. 0% for Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IPAR returned +255. 2% versus SLSN's +160. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SLSN or IPAR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Solesence, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 02β — meaning SLSN is approximately 272% more volatile than IPAR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 102% for Solesence, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SLSN or IPAR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Solesence, Inc.
Common Stock (SLSN) is pulling ahead at 40. 4% versus 2. 5% for Inter Parfums, Inc. (IPAR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Solesence, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 179. 0% year-over-year, compared to 2. 3% for Inter Parfums, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SLSN leads at 21. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SLSN or IPAR?
Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 3% net margin versus 8. 1% for Solesence, Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 11. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IPAR leads at 18. 2% versus 9. 8% for SLSN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IPAR leads at 63. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — SLSN or IPAR?
In this comparison, IPAR (3.
4% yield) pays a dividend. SLSN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SLSN or IPAR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Inter Parfums, Inc.
(IPAR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54), 3. 4% yield, +255. 2% 10Y return). Solesence, Inc. Common Stock (SLSN) carries a higher beta of 2. 02 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (IPAR: +255. 2%, SLSN: +160. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SLSN and IPAR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SLSN is a small-cap high-growth stock; IPAR is a small-cap deep-value stock. IPAR pays a dividend while SLSN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.