Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SM
SM Energy Company

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$3.35B
5Y Perf.+726.7%
MTDR
Matador Resources Company

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$6.90B
5Y Perf.+608.8%
CIVI
Civitas Resources, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.34B
5Y Perf.+60.3%
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$53.57B
5Y Perf.+347.3%
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$28.19B
5Y Perf.+319.6%

SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SM logoSM
MTDR logoMTDR
CIVI logoCIVI
FANG logoFANG
DVN logoDVN
IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Cap$3.35B$6.90B$2.34B$53.57B$28.19B
Revenue (TTM)$3.79B$3.36B$4.71B$15.19B$12.24B
Net Income (TTM)$131M$483M$638M$403M$2.15B
Gross Margin45.1%102.0%43.9%41.8%21.8%
Operating Margin6.5%26.3%31.1%22.1%18.9%
Forward P/E4.4x7.7x6.8x10.7x8.6x
Total Debt$2.30B$3.55B$4.49B$14.49B$8.78B
Cash & Equiv.$368M$79M$76M$106M$1.43B

SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVNLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SM
MTDR
CIVI
FANG
DVN
StockMay 20May 26Return
SM Energy Company (SM)100826.7+726.7%
Matador Resources C… (MTDR)100708.8+608.8%
Civitas Resources, … (CIVI)100160.3+60.3%
Diamondback Energy,… (FANG)100447.3+347.3%
Devon Energy Corpor… (DVN)100419.6+319.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: DVN leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Civitas Resources, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. SM also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SM
SM Energy Company
The Value Play

SM ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value.

  • Lower P/E (4.4x vs 8.6x)
Best for: value
MTDR
Matador Resources Company
The Income Pick

MTDR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.06, yield 2.4%
Best for: income & stability
CIVI
Civitas Resources, Inc.
The Growth Play

CIVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.

  • Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
  • 49.8% revenue growth vs MTDR's 5.1%
  • 18.2% yield, vs MTDR's 2.4%
Best for: growth exposure
FANG
Diamondback Energy, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

FANG is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 162.5% 10Y total return vs MTDR's 201.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
DVN
Devon Energy Corporation
The Defensive Pick

DVN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.05, Low D/E 56.6%, current ratio 0.98x
  • Beta 0.05, yield 2.2%, current ratio 0.98x
  • 17.6% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
  • Beta 0.05 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthCIVI logoCIVI49.8% revenue growth vs MTDR's 5.1%
ValueSM logoSMLower P/E (4.4x vs 8.6x)
Quality / MarginsDVN logoDVN17.6% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
Stability / SafetyDVN logoDVNBeta 0.05 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage
DividendsCIVI logoCIVI18.2% yield, vs MTDR's 2.4%
Momentum (1Y)DVN logoDVN+52.9% vs CIVI's +6.8%
Efficiency (ROA)DVN logoDVN9.1% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 12.3% vs 6.7%

SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMSM Energy Company
FY 2025
E&P Segment
100.0%$3.2B
MTDRMatador Resources Company
FY 2025
Oil and Gas
88.6%$3.2B
Natural Gas, Sales
6.9%$253M
Natural Gas, Midstream
4.5%$165M
CIVICivitas Resources, Inc.
FY 2024
Crude Oil
96.3%$4.4B
Natural Gas
3.7%$168M
FANGDiamondback Energy, Inc.
FY 2025
Oil Exploration and Production
88.3%$25.1B
Oil Purchased
5.2%$1.5B
Natural Gas Liquids Production
5.0%$1.4B
Natural Gas, Production
1.4%$400M
DVNDevon Energy Corporation
FY 2025
N G L Product Sales
100.0%$11.2B

SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCIVILAGGINGMTDR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CIVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 4.5x MTDR's $3.4B. DVN is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSM logoSMSM Energy CompanyMTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…CIVI logoCIVICivitas Resources…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.8B$3.4B$4.7B$15.2B$12.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.6B$2.1B$3.4B$8.6B$5.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$131M$483M$638M$403M$2.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$226M$518M$934M$1.6B$2.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+45.1%+102.0%+43.9%+41.8%+21.8%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.5%+26.3%+31.1%+22.1%+18.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+3.4%+14.4%+13.6%+2.7%+17.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-5.9%+15.4%+19.8%+10.5%+16.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+76.2%-33.2%-8.1%+5.2%-99.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.1%-115.1%-33.9%-98.3%-100.0%
CIVI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 90% valuation discount to FANG's 33.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.8x.

MetricSM logoSMSM Energy CompanyMTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…CIVI logoCIVICivitas Resources…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
Market CapShares × price$3.3B$6.9B$2.3B$53.6B$28.2B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$5.3B$10.4B$6.8B$68.0B$35.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS5.16x9.12x3.24x33.24x10.80x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.4.42x7.72x6.75x10.68x8.62x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.15x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple2.60x4.34x1.89x6.83x4.79x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.06x1.89x0.45x3.57x1.65x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.70x1.15x0.41x1.28x1.84x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.84x28.57x2.61x10.23x9.04x
CIVI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

DVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

DVN delivers a 18.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $19 in annual profit, vs $1 for FANG. FANG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIVI's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs MTDR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSM logoSMSM Energy CompanyMTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…CIVI logoCIVICivitas Resources…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+2.5%+8.2%+9.5%+0.9%+18.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.1%+4.1%+4.2%+0.6%+9.1%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.9%+10.5%+10.8%+6.7%+12.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+10.4%+11.5%+12.1%+7.6%+13.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–973545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.48x0.59x0.68x0.34x0.57x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.9B$3.5B$4.4B$14.4B$7.3B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$368M$79M$76M$106M$1.4B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$3.5B$4.5B$14.5B$8.8B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.37x7.88x2.80x0.66x7.98x
DVN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FANG five years ago would be worth $26,372 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,194 for CIVI. Over the past 12 months, DVN leads with a +52.9% total return vs CIVI's +6.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FANG at 16.3% vs CIVI's -16.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSM logoSMSM Energy CompanyMTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…CIVI logoCIVICivitas Resources…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+53.3%+29.0%-1.5%+25.7%+20.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+41.1%+42.2%+6.8%+50.1%+52.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18.7%+29.9%-41.7%+57.5%-2.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+78.9%+105.5%+31.9%+163.7%+120.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+132.6%+201.8%-86.2%+162.5%+99.0%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+5.9%+9.1%-16.5%+16.3%-0.7%
FANG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FANG and DVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

DVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FANG currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs CIVI's 73.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSM logoSMSM Energy CompanyMTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…CIVI logoCIVICivitas Resources…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.16x0.06x1.10x0.09x0.05x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.25$66.84$37.45$214.51$52.71
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$17.45$37.14$25.38$127.75$29.70
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+83.1%+73.1%+88.8%+86.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10047.443.654.849.743.5
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.9M1.8M22.4M3.4M15.3M
Evenly matched — FANG and DVN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — MTDR and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SM as "Buy", MTDR as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", FANG as "Buy", DVN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.9% upside for MTDR (target: $68) vs -0.3% for SM (target: $29). For income investors, CIVI offers the higher dividend yield at 18.19% vs FANG's 2.10%.

MetricSM logoSMSM Energy CompanyMTDR logoMTDRMatador Resources…CIVI logoCIVICivitas Resources…FANG logoFANGDiamondback Energ…DVN logoDVNDevon Energy Corp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.00$68.29$31.00$201.27$53.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts5442165164
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.7%+2.4%+18.2%+2.1%+2.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises45000
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.80$1.31$4.98$4.00$0.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.4%+0.8%+18.3%+3.8%+3.7%
Evenly matched — MTDR and CIVI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

CIVI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). DVN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.

Best OverallCivitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SM vs MTDR vs CIVI vs FANG vs DVN: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 1% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate SM Energy Company (SM) a "Buy" — based on 54 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN?

On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 33. 2x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN?

Over the past 5 years, Diamondback Energy, Inc.

(FANG) delivered a total return of +163. 7%, compared to +31. 9% for Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +201. 8% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Devon Energy Corporation (DVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

05β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately 1982% more volatile than DVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.

(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus 5. 1% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Civitas Resources, Inc. grew EPS -6. 2% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN?

Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

8% net margin versus 11. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FANG leads at 32. 7% versus 22. 0% for DVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTDR leads at 43. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.

4x forward P/E versus 10. 7x for Diamondback Energy, Inc. — 6. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTDR: 22. 9% to $68. 29.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the highest yield at 18. 2%, versus 2. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG).

09

Is SM or MTDR or CIVI or FANG or DVN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

06), 2. 4% yield, +201. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +201. 8%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SM and MTDR and CIVI and FANG and DVN?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DVN is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SM

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 38%
  • Gross Margin > 27%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MTDR

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CIVI

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 8%
  • Dividend Yield > 7.2%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

FANG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 25%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

DVN

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SM and MTDR and CIVI and FANG and DVN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SM: 76.2% · MTDR: -33.2%)
Net Margin>
%
(SM: 3.4% · MTDR: 14.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(SM: 5.2x · MTDR: 9.1x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.