Banks - Regional
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
SMBK vs SFBS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SMBK vs SFBS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $777M | $4.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $316M | $1.02B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $50M | $277M |
| Gross Margin | 61.0% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 19.4% | 33.6% |
| Forward P/E | 12.5x | 12.9x |
| Total Debt | $102M | $1.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $464M | $95M |
SMBK vs SFBS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) | 100 | 281.0 | +181.0% |
| ServisFirst Bancsha… (SFBS) | 100 | 230.4 | +130.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMBK vs SFBS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMBK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 10.9%, EPS growth 39.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.77, Low D/E 18.4%, current ratio 0.22x
- PEG 0.96 vs SFBS's 1.28
SFBS is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.06, yield 1.6%
- 260.6% 10Y total return vs SMBK's 198.2%
- Beta 1.06, yield 1.6%, current ratio 0.28x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.9% NII/revenue growth vs SFBS's 4.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.5x vs 12.9x), PEG 0.96 vs 1.28 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SMBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.77 vs SFBS's 1.06, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SMBK's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.8% vs SFBS's +12.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.2% vs SMBK's 0.4% |
SMBK vs SFBS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMBK vs SFBS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFBS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFBS is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.0B annually — 3.2x SMBK's $316M. SFBS is the more profitable business, keeping 27.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMBK's 15.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $316M | $1.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $70M | $346M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $50M | $277M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $57M | $351M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +61.0% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +19.4% | +33.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.9% | +27.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +34.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +42.1% | +32.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SMBK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.3x trailing earnings, SMBK trades at a 6% valuation discount to SFBS's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SMBK offers better value at 1.18x vs SFBS's 1.61x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $777M | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $414M | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.26x | 16.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.50x | 12.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.18x | 1.61x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.93x | 17.29x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.46x | 4.43x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.39x | 2.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.10x | 12.89x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SMBK leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SFBS delivers a 15.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $10 for SMBK. SMBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFBS's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SFBS scores 8/9 vs SMBK's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +15.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | +1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.7% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.6% | +4.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.18x | 0.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$363M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $464M | $95M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $102M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.51x | 0.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SMBK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMBK five years ago would be worth $19,258 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,763 for SFBS. Over the past 12 months, SMBK leads with a +41.8% total return vs SFBS's +12.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SMBK at 26.8% vs SFBS's 24.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +24.8% | +15.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +41.8% | +12.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +103.9% | +92.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +27.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +198.2% | +260.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.8% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
SMBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.77 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFBS's 1.06 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMBK currently trades 99.6% from its 52-week high vs SFBS's 90.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.77x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.63 | $90.64 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $30.95 | $67.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +90.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.1 | 65.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 67K | 211K |
Analyst Outlook
SFBS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMBK as "Hold" and SFBS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 9.2% upside for SFBS (target: $90) vs 7.8% for SMBK (target: $49). For income investors, SFBS offers the higher dividend yield at 1.62% vs SMBK's 0.71%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $49.00 | $90.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.7% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $1.34 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SMBK leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SFBS leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook).
SMBK vs SFBS: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMBK or SFBS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the stronger pick with 10. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 1% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS). SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) offers the better valuation at 15. 3x trailing P/E (12. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMBK or SFBS?
On trailing P/E, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the cheapest at 15. 3x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, SmartFinancial, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: SmartFinancial, Inc. wins at 0. 96x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 28x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMBK or SFBS?
Over the past 5 years, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) delivered a total return of +92. 6%, compared to +27. 6% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SFBS returned +260. 6% versus SMBK's +198. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMBK or SFBS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 06β — meaning SFBS is approximately 37% more volatile than SMBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 81% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMBK or SFBS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is pulling ahead at 10. 9% versus 4. 1% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SmartFinancial, Inc. grew EPS 39. 3% year-over-year, compared to 21. 6% for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMBK or SFBS?
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc.
(SFBS) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 2% net margin versus 15. 9% for SmartFinancial, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SFBS leads at 33. 6% versus 19. 4% for SMBK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMBK leads at 61. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMBK or SFBS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 96x versus ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 28x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK) trades at 12. 5x forward P/E versus 12. 9x for ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SFBS: 9. 2% to $90. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMBK or SFBS?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ServisFirst Bancshares, Inc. (SFBS) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 7% for SmartFinancial, Inc. (SMBK).
09Is SMBK or SFBS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SmartFinancial, Inc.
(SMBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 0. 7% yield, +198. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMBK: +198. 2%, SFBS: +260. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMBK and SFBS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.