Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKR

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMC
Summit Midstream Corp.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$372M
5Y Perf.-21.7%
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.

Oil & Gas Drilling

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.84T
5Y Perf.-23.6%
HAL
Halliburton Company

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$32.68B
5Y Perf.+14.9%
SLB
SLB N.V.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$79.62B
5Y Perf.+10.3%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$63.00B
5Y Perf.+65.0%

SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKR — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMC logoSMC
SOC logoSOC
HAL logoHAL
SLB logoSLB
BKR logoBKR
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas DrillingOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$372M$1.84T$32.68B$79.62B$63.00B
Revenue (TTM)$562M$1M$22.17B$35.71B$27.89B
Net Income (TTM)$9M$-498M$1.54B$3.35B$3.12B
Gross Margin72.6%-8.7%15.3%18.2%23.6%
Operating Margin15.2%-367.6%11.3%15.3%25.3%
Forward P/E7.9x17.1x20.3x26.7x
Total Debt$1.05B$0.00$8.13B$12.31B$7.14B
Cash & Equiv.$9M$98M$2.21B$3.04B$3.71B

SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKRLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMC
SOC
HAL
SLB
BKR
StockJul 24May 26Return
Summit Midstream Co… (SMC)10078.3-21.7%
Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC)10076.4-23.6%
Halliburton Company (HAL)100114.9+14.9%
SLB N.V. (SLB)100110.3+10.3%
Baker Hughes Company (BKR)100165.0+65.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKR

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: SMC and HAL are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. Halliburton Company is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. BKR and SOC also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SMC
Summit Midstream Corp.
The Growth Play

SMC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 30.8%, EPS growth 87.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 15.0%
  • 30.8% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
  • 3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: growth exposure
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
The Value Play

SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.

  • Lower P/E (7.9x vs 26.7x)
Best for: value
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Income Pick

HAL is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 1.8%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.57, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 0.57, yield 1.8%, current ratio 2.04x
  • Beta 0.57 vs SOC's 1.51
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, SLB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Long-Run Compounder

BKR ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.

  • 186.8% 10Y total return vs SMC's 279.2%
  • 11.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
  • 7.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs -44.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSMC logoSMC30.8% revenue growth vs HAL's -3.3%
ValueSOC logoSOCLower P/E (7.9x vs 26.7x)
Quality / MarginsBKR logoBKR11.2% margin vs SOC's -391.5%
Stability / SafetyHAL logoHALBeta 0.57 vs SOC's 1.51
DividendsSMC logoSMC3.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SLB's 2.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)HAL logoHAL+105.6% vs SOC's -36.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BKR logoBKR7.3% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC 12.7% vs -44.6%

SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMCSummit Midstream Corp.
FY 2025
Natural Gas N G L And Condensate Sales
47.2%$265M
Gathering Servicesand Related Fees
45.5%$256M
Other Products And Services
7.4%$41M
SOCSable Offshore Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

HALHalliburton Company
FY 2025
Completion And Production
57.6%$12.8B
Drilling And Evaluation
42.4%$9.4B
SLBSLB N.V.
FY 2025
Production Systems
38.4%$13.3B
Well Construction
34.2%$11.9B
Reservoir Characterization
19.7%$6.8B
Digital Integration
7.7%$2.7B
BKRBaker Hughes Company
FY 2025
Oilfield Services And Equipment
51.6%$14.3B
Industrial And Energy Technology
48.4%$13.4B

SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKR — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBKRLAGGINGSLB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

SLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $35.7B annually — 28095.2x SOC's $1M. BKR is the more profitable business, keeping 11.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%. On growth, SMC holds the edge at +33.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSMC logoSMCSummit Midstream …SOC logoSOCSable Offshore Co…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$562M$1M$22.2B$35.7B$27.9B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$201M-$454M$3.4B$7.4B$4.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$9M-$498M$1.5B$3.4B$3.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$4M-$611M$1.7B$4.8B$2.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.6%-8.7%+15.3%+18.2%+23.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.2%-367.6%+11.3%+15.3%+25.3%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.6%-391.5%+6.9%+9.4%+11.2%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-0.7%-480.4%+7.6%+13.4%+9.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+33.0%-0.3%+5.0%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+72.5%-5.4%+129.2%-31.2%+132.5%
BKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 22.6x trailing earnings, SLB trades at a 13% valuation discount to HAL's 26.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SMC's 7.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than BKR's 14.0x.

MetricSMC logoSMCSummit Midstream …SOC logoSOCSable Offshore Co…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
Market CapShares × price$372M$1.84T$32.7B$79.6B$63.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.4B$1.84T$38.6B$88.9B$66.4B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-18.86x-3.07x26.09x22.57x24.43x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.7.88x17.13x20.26x26.67x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple7.56x11.37x12.07x14.00x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.66x1.47x2.23x2.27x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.34x2359.43x3.13x2.89x3.32x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.36x19.55x16.60x24.83x
SMC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMC's 0.97x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSMC logoSMCSummit Midstream …SOC logoSOCSable Offshore Co…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+0.8%-113.8%+14.6%+13.9%+16.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+0.4%-28.9%+6.1%+6.5%+7.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+2.7%-44.6%+10.2%+12.1%+12.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+3.3%-37.5%+11.6%+14.3%+13.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–952546
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.97x0.77x0.45x0.38x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.0B-$98M$5.9B$9.3B$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$9M$98M$2.2B$3.0B$3.7B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.1B$0$8.1B$12.3B$7.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.94x-2.28x9.19x9.40x9.68x
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BKR five years ago would be worth $27,526 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,224 for SMC. Over the past 12 months, HAL leads with a +105.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BKR at 33.1% vs SMC's -6.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMC logoSMCSummit Midstream …SOC logoSOCSable Offshore Co…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+13.4%+9.5%+32.8%+32.7%+35.7%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.0%-36.8%+105.6%+61.8%+77.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.8%+26.5%+37.4%+20.8%+136.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-17.8%+32.6%+82.6%+80.6%+175.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+279.2%+32.4%+16.2%-9.2%+186.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-6.3%+8.2%+11.2%+6.5%+33.1%
BKR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — HAL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.57 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLB currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMC logoSMCSummit Midstream …SOC logoSOCSable Offshore Co…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.55x1.42x0.48x0.83x0.79x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.50$35.00$42.46$57.20$70.41
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$19.13$3.72$19.22$31.64$35.83
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+90.7%+36.7%+92.2%+92.7%+90.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.445.855.757.957.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded67K5.4M15.0M16.3M9.1M
Evenly matched — HAL and SLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — SMC and HAL and SLB and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SOC as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 118.1% upside for SOC (target: $28) vs 1.3% for HAL (target: $40). For income investors, SMC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.63% vs BKR's 1.44%.

MetricSMC logoSMCSummit Midstream …SOC logoSOCSable Offshore Co…HAL logoHALHalliburton Compa…SLB logoSLBSLB N.V.BKR logoBKRBaker Hughes Comp…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$47.00$28.00$39.64$58.66$73.20
# AnalystsCovering analysts4646645
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.6%+1.8%+2.0%+1.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1444
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.10$0.69$1.08$0.92
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+3.1%+3.0%+0.6%
Evenly matched — SMC and HAL and SLB and BKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

BKR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SMC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallBaker Hughes Company (BKR)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMC vs SOC vs HAL vs SLB vs BKR: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Summit Midstream Corp.

(SMC) is the stronger pick with 30. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR?

On trailing P/E, SLB N.

V. (SLB) is the cheapest at 22. 6x versus Halliburton Company at 26. 1x. On forward P/E, Sable Offshore Corp. is actually cheaper at 7. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR?

Over the past 5 years, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) delivered a total return of +175.

3%, compared to -17. 8% for Summit Midstream Corp. (SMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMC returned +277. 7% versus SLB's -8. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

48β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 42β — meaning SOC is approximately 194% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 97% for Summit Midstream Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Summit Midstream Corp.

(SMC) is pulling ahead at 30. 8% versus -3. 3% for Halliburton Company (HAL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Summit Midstream Corp. grew EPS 87. 4% year-over-year, compared to -47. 0% for Halliburton Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMC leads at 15. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR?

SLB N.

V. (SLB) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 4% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps 9. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLB leads at 15. 3% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMC leads at 72. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Sable Offshore Corp.

(SOC) trades at 7. 9x forward P/E versus 26. 7x for Baker Hughes Company — 18. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SOC: 118. 1% to $28. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR?

In this comparison, SMC (3.

6% yield), SLB (2. 0% yield), HAL (1. 8% yield), BKR (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. SOC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SMC or SOC or HAL or SLB or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Summit Midstream Corp.

(SMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 3. 6% yield, +277. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMC: +277. 7%, SOC: +32. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMC and SOC and HAL and SLB and BKR?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SMC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SOC is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SMC, HAL, SLB, BKR pay a dividend while SOC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SMC

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 16%
  • Gross Margin > 43%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SOC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HAL

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 5%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BKR

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.