Banks - Diversified
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMFG vs KB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
SMFG vs KB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $139.44B | $39.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $9.66T | $50.69T |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.39T | $5.84T |
| Gross Margin | 48.9% | 49.1% |
| Operating Margin | 17.6% | 16.8% |
| Forward P/E | 0.1x | 0.0x |
| Total Debt | $58.30T | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $75.59T | $0.00 |
SMFG vs KB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sumitomo Mitsui Fin… (SMFG) | 100 | 380.6 | +280.6% |
| KB Financial Group … (KB) | 100 | 405.4 | +305.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMFG vs KB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMFG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 1.11, yield 3.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.11, current ratio 0.45x
- Beta 1.11, yield 3.1%, current ratio 0.45x
KB is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 34.2%, EPS growth 20.1%
- 356.4% 10Y total return vs SMFG's 320.1%
- PEG 0.00 vs SMFG's 0.01
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 34.2% NII/revenue growth vs SMFG's 10.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.0x vs 0.1x), PEG 0.00 vs 0.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs KB's 0.3% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs KB's 1.22 | |
| Dividends | 3.1% yield; 8-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +71.2% vs SMFG's +59.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs KB's 0.3% |
SMFG vs KB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMFG leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KB is the larger business by revenue, generating $50.69T annually — 5.2x SMFG's $9.66T. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.2% (SMFG) to 11.5% (KB).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $9.66T | $50.69T |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.95T | $9.21T |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.39T | $5.84T |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $0 | -$8.38T |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +48.9% | +49.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.6% | +16.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +11.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +61.0% | +12.6% |
Valuation Metrics
KB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.6x trailing earnings, KB trades at a 7% valuation discount to SMFG's 11.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), KB offers better value at 0.89x vs SMFG's 0.92x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139.4B | $39.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $28.7B | $39.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.35x | 10.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.09x | 0.01x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.92x | 0.89x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.26x | 6.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.25x | 1.13x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 4.73x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
KB leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
KB delivers a 9.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for SMFG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SMFG scores 7/9 vs KB's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.1% | +9.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +4.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.9% | — |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.93x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$17.29T | $0 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $75.59T | $0 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $58.30T | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.43x | 0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SMFG five years ago would be worth $32,521 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $23,794 for KB. Over the past 12 months, KB leads with a +71.2% total return vs SMFG's +59.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KB at 46.5% vs SMFG's 40.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +12.7% | +29.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +59.6% | +71.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +179.9% | +214.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +225.2% | +137.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +320.1% | +356.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.9% | +46.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMFG and KB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMFG is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KB's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 1.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.34 | $119.71 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $13.90 | $65.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.1% | +92.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.2M | 251K |
Analyst Outlook
SMFG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SMFG as "Hold" and KB as "Hold". SMFG is the only dividend payer here at 3.08% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 6 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 8 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $105.47 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.2% | 0.0% |
KB leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SMFG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SMFG vs KB: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMFG or KB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, KB Financial Group Inc.
(KB) is the stronger pick with 34. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 10. 2% for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG). KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) offers the better valuation at 10. 6x trailing P/E (0. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMFG or KB?
On trailing P/E, KB Financial Group Inc.
(KB) is the cheapest at 10. 6x versus Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. at 11. 4x. On forward P/E, KB Financial Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: KB Financial Group Inc. wins at 0. 00x versus Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMFG or KB?
Over the past 5 years, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
(SMFG) delivered a total return of +225. 2%, compared to +137. 9% for KB Financial Group Inc. (KB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KB returned +356. 4% versus SMFG's +320. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMFG or KB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
(SMFG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus KB Financial Group Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning KB is approximately 10% more volatile than SMFG relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — SMFG or KB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), KB Financial Group Inc.
(KB) is pulling ahead at 34. 2% versus 10. 2% for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. (SMFG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. grew EPS 26. 1% year-over-year, compared to 20. 1% for KB Financial Group Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMFG or KB?
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
(SMFG) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 11. 5% for KB Financial Group Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMFG leads at 17. 6% versus 16. 8% for KB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KB leads at 49. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMFG or KB more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 00x versus Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. 's 0. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, KB Financial Group Inc. (KB) trades at 0. 0x forward P/E versus 0. 1x for Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMFG or KB?
In this comparison, SMFG (3.
1% yield) pays a dividend. KB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMFG or KB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc.
(SMFG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 11), 3. 1% yield, +320. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMFG: +320. 1%, KB: +356. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMFG and KB?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMFG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; KB is a mid-cap high-growth stock. SMFG pays a dividend while KB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.