Agricultural Inputs
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Household & Personal Products
Packaged Foods
Food Distribution
Drug Manufacturers - General
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Inputs | Household & Personal Products | Packaged Foods | Food Distribution | Drug Manufacturers - General |
| Market Cap | $3.62B | $1.83B | $2.40B | $2.41B | $177.59B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.35B | $2.79B | $3.16B | $10.98B | $37.24B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $90M | $105M | $171M | $129M | $7.80B |
| Gross Margin | 31.0% | 36.6% | 32.2% | 6.6% | 71.5% |
| Operating Margin | 11.7% | 4.1% | 8.2% | 1.1% | 31.6% |
| Forward P/E | 14.2x | 14.8x | 13.5x | 14.5x | 14.7x |
| Total Debt | $2.38B | $654M | $1.44B | $1.04B | $54.60B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $124M | $882M | $98M | $9.13B |
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| The Scotts Miracle-… (SMG) | 100 | 43.7 | -56.3% |
| Spectrum Brands Hol… (SPB) | 100 | 166.1 | +66.1% |
| Central Garden & Pe… (CENT) | 100 | 134.1 | +34.1% |
| The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) | 100 | 546.4 | +446.4% |
| Amgen Inc. (AMGN) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for dividends.
- 4.2% yield, vs ANDE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Among these 5 stocks, SPB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CENT is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (13.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 4.52 vs 5.01
ANDE is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- 192.1% 10Y total return vs AMGN's 156.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.55, Low D/E 80.8%, current ratio 1.41x
- PEG 0.22 vs AMGN's 5.01
- Beta 0.55, yield 1.1%, current ratio 1.41x
AMGN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.60, yield 2.9%
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 88.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.8%
- 9.9% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2%
- 20.9% margin vs ANDE's 1.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs SPB's -5.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.5x vs 14.7x), PEG 4.52 vs 5.01 | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.9% margin vs ANDE's 1.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.55 vs SMG's 1.10 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs ANDE's 1.1%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.2% vs CENT's +11.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.6% ROA vs SMG's 2.9%, ROIC 14.8% vs 13.3% |
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMGN leads in 1 of 6 categories
CENT leads 1 • ANDE leads 1 • SMG leads 0 • SPB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMGN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMGN is the larger business by revenue, generating $37.2B annually — 13.4x SPB's $2.8B. AMGN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ANDE's 1.2%. On growth, CENT holds the edge at +8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $2.8B | $3.2B | $11.0B | $37.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $466M | $214M | $302M | $218M | $15.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $90M | $105M | $171M | $129M | $7.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $358M | $303M | $282M | -$105M | $8.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.0% | +36.6% | +32.2% | +6.6% | +71.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +4.1% | +8.2% | +1.1% | +31.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +3.8% | +5.4% | +1.2% | +20.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +10.9% | +8.9% | -1.0% | +23.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -15.0% | -3.3% | +8.7% | -1.2% | +5.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -78.5% | +48.8% | +30.6% | +96.0% | +4.4% |
Valuation Metrics
CENT leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.1x trailing earnings, CENT trades at a 40% valuation discount to ANDE's 25.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ANDE offers better value at 0.39x vs AMGN's 7.86x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.6B | $1.8B | $2.4B | $2.4B | $177.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.0B | $2.4B | $3.0B | $3.4B | $223.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 25.25x | 20.37x | 15.11x | 25.29x | 23.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.23x | 14.84x | 13.55x | 14.50x | 14.74x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.57x | 5.04x | 0.39x | 7.86x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.75x | 10.59x | 8.45x | 12.82x | 14.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 0.65x | 0.77x | 0.22x | 4.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.07x | 1.55x | 1.88x | 20.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.22x | 11.04x | 8.25x | — | 21.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SPB and AMGN each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMGN delivers a 89.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $89 in annual profit, vs $6 for SPB. SPB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AMGN's 6.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CENT scores 8/9 vs ANDE's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +5.5% | +10.7% | +9.5% | +89.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.9% | +3.0% | +4.7% | +3.6% | +8.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +13.3% | +3.9% | +9.1% | +4.6% | +14.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.4% | +4.2% | +8.7% | +5.8% | +16.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.34x | 0.91x | 0.81x | 6.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $531M | $558M | $945M | $45.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $124M | $882M | $98M | $9.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.4B | $654M | $1.4B | $1.0B | $54.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.08x | 3.33x | 1200.51x | 3.21x | 5.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ANDE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ANDE five years ago would be worth $24,161 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,094 for SMG. Over the past 12 months, ANDE leads with a +127.2% total return vs CENT's +11.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ANDE at 25.4% vs SMG's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.1% | +31.7% | +20.6% | +34.2% | +1.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.7% | +30.1% | +11.8% | +127.2% | +22.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.2% | +14.2% | +30.9% | +97.0% | +51.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.1% | -7.8% | -17.2% | +141.6% | +46.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +34.9% | +11.9% | +161.6% | +192.1% | +156.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.1% | +4.5% | +9.4% | +25.4% | +15.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CENT and ANDE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ANDE is the less volatile stock with a 0.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMG's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CENT currently trades 93.3% from its 52-week high vs AMGN's 84.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.10x | 0.82x | 0.65x | 0.55x | 0.60x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $72.35 | $86.95 | $41.30 | $82.11 | $391.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $52.00 | $49.99 | $28.77 | $31.03 | $261.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.2% | +90.4% | +93.3% | +86.2% | +84.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.9 | 61.3 | 47.2 | 35.0 | 39.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 938K | 318K | 74K | 333K | 2.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMG and ANDE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMG as "Buy", SPB as "Buy", CENT as "Buy", ANDE as "Buy", AMGN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 32.4% upside for CENT (target: $51) vs 5.9% for ANDE (target: $75). For income investors, SMG offers the higher dividend yield at 4.21% vs ANDE's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $72.00 | $85.00 | $51.00 | $75.00 | $350.76 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 21 | 10 | 20 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +2.4% | — | +1.1% | +2.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 2 | 23 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $2.63 | $1.86 | — | $0.79 | $9.45 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +17.8% | +6.5% | +0.6% | 0.0% |
AMGN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). CENT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SMG vs SPB vs CENT vs ANDE vs AMGN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) offers the better valuation at 15. 1x trailing P/E (13. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN?
On trailing P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) is the cheapest at 15.
1x versus The Andersons, Inc. at 25. 3x. On forward P/E, Central Garden & Pet Company is actually cheaper at 13. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: The Andersons, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 01x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN?
Over the past 5 years, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) delivered a total return of +141. 6%, compared to -69. 1% for The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company (SMG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ANDE returned +192. 1% versus SPB's +11. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 55β versus The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company's 1. 10β — meaning SMG is approximately 100% more volatile than ANDE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 6% for Amgen Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus -5. 2% for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. (SPB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company grew EPS 504. 9% year-over-year, compared to -15. 7% for The Andersons, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMGN leads at 11. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN?
Amgen Inc.
(AMGN) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 0. 9% for The Andersons, Inc. — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMGN leads at 29. 1% versus 1. 2% for ANDE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMGN leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, The Andersons, Inc. (ANDE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Amgen Inc. 's 5. 01x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Central Garden & Pet Company (CENT) trades at 13. 5x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for Spectrum Brands Holdings, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CENT: 32. 4% to $51. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN?
In this comparison, SMG (4.
2% yield), AMGN (2. 9% yield), SPB (2. 4% yield), ANDE (1. 1% yield) pay a dividend. CENT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMG or SPB or CENT or ANDE or AMGN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Andersons, Inc.
(ANDE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 55), 1. 1% yield, +192. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ANDE: +192. 1%, CENT: +161. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMG and SPB and CENT and ANDE and AMGN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMG (Basic Materials) and SPB (Consumer Defensive) and CENT (Consumer Defensive) and ANDE (Consumer Defensive) and AMGN (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SPB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CENT is a small-cap deep-value stock; ANDE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMGN is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SMG, SPB, ANDE, AMGN pay a dividend while CENT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.