Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Conglomerates
Asset Management
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Conglomerates | Asset Management | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $204M | $905M | $89.45B | $3.87B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $1.85B | $19.26B | $1.35B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $-227M | $2.37B | $298M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 38.7% | 41.8% | 22.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 0.3% | 2.4% | 20.0% |
| Forward P/E | — | 97.9x | 16.9x | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $336M | $1.88B | $54.77B | $655M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $69M | $68M | $6M | $579M |
SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEACOR Marine Holdi… (SMHI) | 100 | 480.0 | +380.0% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 73.5 | -26.5% |
| KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) | 100 | 369.4 | +269.4% |
| Tidewater Inc. (TDW) | 100 | 1701.5 | +1601.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMHI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.96, yield 1.5%, current ratio 2.54x
CODI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 4.8% revenue growth vs SMHI's -16.0%
- 4.2% yield, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
KKR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs SMHI's -63.3%
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 22.8x)
TDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 0.5%, EPS growth 95.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- 22.2% margin vs SMHI's -13.0%
- Beta 0.74 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs SMHI's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs SMHI's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs KKR's 1.70, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs KKR's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +97.5% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 15.2% vs 1.0% |
SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDW leads in 1 of 6 categories
KKR leads 1 • SMHI leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — KKR and TDW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
KKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $19.3B annually — 88.9x SMHI's $217M. TDW is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMHI's -13.0%. On growth, TDW holds the edge at -2.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $1.8B | $19.3B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $109M | $9.0B | $477M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | -$227M | $2.4B | $298M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$74M | $10M | $7.5B | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +38.7% | +41.8% | +22.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +0.3% | +2.4% | +20.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | -12.3% | +12.3% | +22.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.2% | +0.5% | +49.4% | +20.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.2% | -5.9% | — | -2.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.9% | -5.1% | -1.7% | -85.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMHI and KKR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.7x trailing earnings, TDW trades at a 73% valuation discount to KKR's 42.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDW's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than KKR's 20.2x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $905M | $89.4B | $3.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $471M | $2.7B | $144.2B | $3.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.12x | -3.94x | 42.88x | 11.73x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 97.88x | 16.89x | 22.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.75x | 14.99x | 20.24x | 7.15x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 0.48x | 4.64x | 2.86x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 1.58x | 1.17x | 2.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 9.39x | 10.96x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TDW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TDW delivers a 23.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. TDW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.48x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDW scores 8/9 vs CODI's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | -49.6% | +3.2% | +23.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | -7.3% | +0.6% | +13.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +1.0% | +0.3% | +15.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +2.4% | +0.1% | +15.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 3.27x | 0.67x | 0.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $267M | $1.8B | $54.8B | $76M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69M | $68M | $6M | $579M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $336M | $1.9B | $54.8B | $655M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | -0.97x | 3.29x | 4.05x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
KKR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDW five years ago would be worth $55,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,447 for CODI. Over the past 12 months, TDW leads with a +97.5% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KKR at 27.6% vs CODI's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | +158.7% | -22.0% | +49.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.8% | -30.3% | -13.0% | +97.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | -25.6% | +107.7% | +81.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | -35.5% | +76.5% | +456.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | +53.7% | +715.5% | -67.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | -9.4% | +27.6% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMHI and TDW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KKR's 1.70 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SMHI currently trades 92.4% from its 52-week high vs KKR's 65.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.83x | 1.28x | 1.66x | 0.73x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.17 | $17.46 | $153.87 | $93.13 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.32 | $4.58 | $82.67 | $38.24 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +68.9% | +65.2% | +83.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 70.0 | 52.4 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 114K | 1.2M | 6.5M | 852K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CODI and KKR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMHI as "Hold", CODI as "Hold", KKR as "Buy", TDW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 40.7% upside for KKR (target: $141) vs 24.7% for CODI (target: $15). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs KKR's 0.80%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.00 | $141.14 | $101.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 14 | 27 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +4.2% | +0.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | $0.50 | $0.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.7% | +0.0% | +0.1% | +2.3% |
TDW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency). KKR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
SMHI vs CODI vs KKR vs TDW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass Diversified (CODI) is the stronger pick with 4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI). Tidewater Inc. (TDW) offers the better valuation at 11. 7x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW?
On trailing P/E, Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the cheapest at 11. 7x versus KKR & Co. Inc. at 42. 9x. On forward P/E, KKR & Co. Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 9x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW?
Over the past 5 years, Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) delivered a total return of +456. 1%, compared to -35. 5% for Compass Diversified (CODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KKR returned +732. 3% versus TDW's -66. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus KKR & Co. Inc. 's 1. 66β — meaning KKR is approximately 129% more volatile than TDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Tidewater Inc. (TDW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 48% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass Diversified (CODI) is pulling ahead at 4.
8% versus -16. 0% for SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Tidewater Inc. grew EPS 95. 3% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDW leads at 27. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW?
Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDW leads at 21. 4% versus 2. 3% for CODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — KKR leads at 41. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, KKR & Co.
Inc. (KKR) trades at 16. 9x forward P/E versus 97. 9x for Compass Diversified — 81. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KKR: 40. 7% to $141. 14.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW?
In this comparison, CODI (4.
2% yield), SMHI (1. 5% yield), KKR (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TDW does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMHI or CODI or KKR or TDW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.
(SMHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 83), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMHI: -63. 9%, TDW: -66. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMHI and CODI and KKR and TDW?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMHI (Industrials) and CODI (Industrials) and KKR (Financial Services) and TDW (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMHI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; KKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TDW is a small-cap deep-value stock. SMHI, CODI, KKR pay a dividend while TDW does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.