Marine Shipping
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Conglomerates
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Marine Shipping
SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Conglomerates | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Marine Shipping |
| Market Cap | $204M | $3.87B | $905M | $3.65B | $5.48B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $217M | $1.35B | $1.85B | $2.80B | $3.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $298M | $-227M | $339M | $429M |
| Gross Margin | 19.3% | 22.4% | 38.7% | 20.0% | 18.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.4% | 20.0% | 0.3% | 10.3% | 13.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.8x | 150.4x | 20.5x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $336M | $655M | $1.88B | $487M | $727M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $69M | $579M | $68M | $689M | $142M |
SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SEACOR Marine Holdi… (SMHI) | 100 | 487.1 | +387.1% |
| Tidewater Inc. (TDW) | 100 | 1632.3 | +1532.3% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
| Oceaneering Interna… (OII) | 100 | 569.8 | +469.8% |
| Matson, Inc. (MATX) | 100 | 630.1 | +530.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMHI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.96, yield 1.5%
- Beta 0.96, yield 1.5%, current ratio 2.54x
TDW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 48.1%, current ratio 2.90x
- 22.2% margin vs SMHI's -13.0%
- Beta 0.74 vs MATX's 1.76
- 13.4% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 15.2% vs 1.0%
CODI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth and dividends is your priority.
- 4.8% revenue growth vs SMHI's -16.0%
- 4.2% yield, vs MATX's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
OII ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 4.6%, EPS growth 142.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.5%
- +99.0% vs CODI's -30.3%
MATX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 476.1% 10Y total return vs OII's 16.7%
- Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs SMHI's -16.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.4x vs 20.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 22.2% margin vs SMHI's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs MATX's 1.76 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, vs MATX's 0.8%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +99.0% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.4% ROA vs CODI's -7.3%, ROIC 15.2% vs 1.0% |
SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TDW leads in 1 of 6 categories
OII leads 1 • MATX leads 1 • SMHI leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TDW leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MATX is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.3B annually — 15.3x SMHI's $217M. TDW is the more profitable business, keeping 22.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMHI's -13.0%. On growth, OII holds the edge at +2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $217M | $1.3B | $1.8B | $2.8B | $3.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $50M | $477M | $109M | $394M | $644M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | $298M | -$227M | $339M | $429M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$74M | $282M | $10M | $240M | $418M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +19.3% | +22.4% | +38.7% | +20.0% | +18.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +20.0% | +0.3% | +10.3% | +13.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -13.0% | +22.2% | -12.3% | +12.1% | +12.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -34.2% | +20.9% | +0.5% | +8.6% | +12.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.2% | -2.2% | -5.9% | +2.7% | -3.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.9% | -85.5% | -5.1% | -26.5% | -15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SMHI and TDW each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.5x trailing earnings, OII trades at a 19% valuation discount to MATX's 13.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, TDW's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODI's 15.0x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $204M | $3.9B | $905M | $3.6B | $5.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $471M | $3.9B | $2.7B | $3.4B | $6.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.12x | 11.73x | -3.94x | 10.48x | 12.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.79x | 150.38x | 20.47x | 13.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 0.51x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.75x | 7.15x | 14.99x | 8.47x | 7.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.90x | 2.86x | 0.48x | 1.31x | 1.64x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.75x | 2.86x | 1.58x | 3.44x | 2.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.96x | — | 17.55x | 35.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OII leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
OII delivers a 34.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $34 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. MATX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.26x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TDW scores 8/9 vs MATX's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +23.8% | -49.6% | +34.3% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -4.2% | +13.4% | -7.3% | +13.3% | +9.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +1.8% | +15.2% | +1.0% | +23.4% | +10.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.2% | +15.2% | +2.4% | +17.7% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.27x | 0.48x | 3.27x | 0.45x | 0.26x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $267M | $76M | $1.8B | -$201M | $585M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $69M | $579M | $68M | $689M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $336M | $655M | $1.9B | $487M | $727M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.74x | 4.05x | -0.97x | 7.65x | 127.63x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MATX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TDW five years ago would be worth $55,614 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,447 for CODI. Over the past 12 months, OII leads with a +99.0% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MATX at 40.5% vs CODI's -9.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +26.3% | +49.1% | +158.7% | +47.2% | +46.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +70.8% | +97.5% | -30.3% | +99.0% | +92.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -11.6% | +81.9% | -25.6% | +115.9% | +177.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +92.6% | +456.1% | -35.5% | +137.5% | +181.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.3% | -67.7% | +53.7% | +16.7% | +476.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.0% | +22.1% | -9.4% | +29.3% | +40.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — TDW and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TDW is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MATX's 1.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MATX currently trades 95.1% from its 52-week high vs CODI's 68.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 0.74x | 1.09x | 1.06x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.17 | $93.13 | $17.46 | $40.12 | $189.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.32 | $38.24 | $4.58 | $18.31 | $86.97 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.4% | +83.6% | +68.9% | +91.2% | +95.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 43.2 | 70.0 | 51.4 | 64.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 114K | 852K | 1.2M | 1.2M | 274K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CODI and MATX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMHI as "Hold", TDW as "Hold", CODI as "Hold", OII as "Hold", MATX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.3% upside for TDW (target: $117) vs -9.8% for OII (target: $33). For income investors, CODI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.16% vs MATX's 0.80%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $117.00 | $15.00 | $33.00 | $190.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 26 | 14 | 44 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | — | +4.2% | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.11 | — | $0.50 | — | $1.44 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.7% | +2.3% | +0.0% | +1.2% | +5.5% |
TDW leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). OII leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SMHI vs TDW vs CODI vs OII vs MATX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass Diversified (CODI) is the stronger pick with 4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 0% for SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI). Oceaneering International, Inc. (OII) offers the better valuation at 10. 5x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Matson, Inc. (MATX) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX?
On trailing P/E, Oceaneering International, Inc.
(OII) is the cheapest at 10. 5x versus Matson, Inc. at 13. 0x. On forward P/E, Matson, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX?
Over the past 5 years, Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) delivered a total return of +456. 1%, compared to -35. 5% for Compass Diversified (CODI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MATX returned +476. 1% versus TDW's -67. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Matson, Inc. 's 1. 76β — meaning MATX is approximately 137% more volatile than TDW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Matson, Inc. (MATX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 26% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass Diversified (CODI) is pulling ahead at 4.
8% versus -16. 0% for SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc. (SMHI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Oceaneering International, Inc. grew EPS 142. 4% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDW leads at 27. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX?
Tidewater Inc.
(TDW) is the more profitable company, earning 24. 7% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps 24. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDW leads at 21. 4% versus 2. 3% for CODI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODI leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Matson, Inc.
(MATX) trades at 13. 4x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 137. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TDW: 50. 3% to $117. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX?
In this comparison, CODI (4.
2% yield), SMHI (1. 5% yield), MATX (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. TDW, OII do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SMHI or TDW or CODI or OII or MATX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, SEACOR Marine Holdings Inc.
(SMHI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), 1. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SMHI: -63. 3%, OII: +16. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMHI and TDW and CODI and OII and MATX?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMHI (Industrials) and TDW (Energy) and CODI (Industrials) and OII (Energy) and MATX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMHI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TDW is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; OII is a small-cap deep-value stock; MATX is a small-cap deep-value stock. SMHI, CODI, MATX pay a dividend while TDW, OII do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.