Software - Application
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SMSI vs SHEN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
SMSI vs SHEN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $18M | $888M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $266M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-28M | $-36M |
| Gross Margin | 75.5% | 37.9% |
| Operating Margin | -154.8% | -10.3% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $642M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1M | $27M |
SMSI vs SHEN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Micro Softwar… (SMSI) | 100 | 2.6 | -97.4% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMSI vs SHEN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMSI is the clearest fit if your priority is dividends.
- 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7%
SHEN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 0.7%
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 21.7% 10Y total return vs SMSI's -96.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% revenue growth vs SMSI's -15.5% | |
| Quality / Margins | -13.7% margin vs SMSI's -165.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.89 vs SMSI's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 4.2% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SHEN's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.8% vs SMSI's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.0% ROA vs SMSI's -104.4%, ROIC -1.1% vs -48.3% |
SMSI vs SHEN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMSI vs SHEN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SMSI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHEN is the larger business by revenue, generating $266M annually — 15.7x SMSI's $17M. SHEN is the more profitable business, keeping -13.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMSI's -165.4%. On growth, SMSI holds the edge at -8.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $266M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$21M | $104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$28M | -$36M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$10M | -$276M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +75.5% | +37.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -154.8% | -10.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -165.4% | -13.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -61.3% | -103.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +64.3% | -18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $18M | $888M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19M | $1.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.61x | -22.61x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 13.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.06x | 2.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.00x | 0.91x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SHEN leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SHEN delivers a -3.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-142 for SMSI. SMSI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SHEN's 0.66x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -141.9% | -3.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -104.4% | -2.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -48.3% | -1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -62.8% | -1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.13x | 0.66x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $844,000 | $614M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1M | $27M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $642M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -7.39x | -0.65x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SHEN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SHEN five years ago would be worth $7,267 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $208 for SMSI. Over the past 12 months, SHEN leads with a +43.8% total return vs SMSI's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SHEN at -5.6% vs SMSI's -55.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +62.4% | +41.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | +43.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.0% | -15.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.9% | -27.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.2% | +21.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -55.2% | -5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
SHEN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHEN is the less volatile stock with a 0.89 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMSI's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs SMSI's 68.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.30 | $17.34 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.43 | $9.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +68.7% | +92.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 71.7 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 306K | 296K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SMSI and SHEN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, SMSI offers the higher dividend yield at 4.18% vs SHEN's 0.73%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $29.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | $0.12 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SHEN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SMSI leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
SMSI vs SHEN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMSI or SHEN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SMSI or SHEN?
Over the past 5 years, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) delivered a total return of -27.
3%, compared to -97. 9% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SHEN returned +21. 7% versus SMSI's -96. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SMSI or SHEN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
89β versus Smith Micro Software, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SMSI is approximately 67% more volatile than SHEN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 66% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SMSI or SHEN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus -15. 5% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Smith Micro Software, Inc. grew EPS 62. 9% year-over-year, compared to -120. 1% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SMSI or SHEN?
Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the more profitable company, earning -11.
0% net margin versus -173. 3% for Smith Micro Software, Inc. — meaning it keeps -11. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SHEN leads at -6. 2% versus -110. 8% for SMSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMSI leads at 74. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SMSI or SHEN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Smith Micro Software, Inc. (SMSI) offers the highest yield at 4. 2%, versus 0. 7% for Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN).
07Is SMSI or SHEN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
89), 0. 7% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SHEN: +21. 7%, SMSI: -96. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SMSI and SHEN?
These companies operate in different sectors (SMSI (Technology) and SHEN (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SMSI is a small-cap income-oriented stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.