Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
Medical - Distribution
Medical - Instruments & Supplies
SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Instruments & Supplies | Medical - Distribution | Medical - Instruments & Supplies |
| Market Cap | $170M | $5.67B | $8.09B | $1.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $103M | $5.21B | $13.18B | $552M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-38M | $-219M | $398M | $-5M |
| Gross Margin | 92.7% | 55.9% | 29.1% | 75.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.9% | 5.9% | 5.8% | -0.4% |
| Forward P/E | 165.9x | 20.1x | 13.3x | 370.7x |
| Total Debt | $48M | $5.37B | $3.69B | $88M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $383M | $156M | $167M |
SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sanara MedTech Inc. (SMTI) | 100 | 87.3 | -12.7% |
| Bausch + Lomb Corpo… (BLCO) | 100 | 93.5 | -6.5% |
| Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) | 100 | 82.3 | -17.7% |
| AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) | 100 | 68.4 | -31.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMTI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 218.0% 10Y total return vs HSIC's 5.3%
- 19.0% revenue growth vs HSIC's 4.0%
BLCO is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +39.5% vs SMTI's -40.1%
HSIC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.73
- Lower P/E (13.3x vs 370.7x)
- 3.0% margin vs SMTI's -36.4%
- Beta 0.73 vs SMTI's 1.42, lower leverage
ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 17.9%, current ratio 3.96x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 3.96x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs HSIC's 4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (13.3x vs 370.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.0% margin vs SMTI's -36.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.73 vs SMTI's 1.42, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.5% vs SMTI's -40.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.6% ROA vs SMTI's -49.2%, ROIC 7.1% vs 11.8% |
SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HSIC leads in 2 of 6 categories
SMTI leads 0 • BLCO leads 0 • ATRC leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SMTI and ATRC each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
HSIC is the larger business by revenue, generating $13.2B annually — 127.9x SMTI's $103M. HSIC is the more profitable business, keeping 3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMTI's -36.4%. On growth, ATRC holds the edge at +14.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103M | $5.2B | $13.2B | $552M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8M | $724M | $1.1B | $13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$38M | -$219M | $398M | -$5M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $4M | $561M | $54M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +92.7% | +55.9% | +29.1% | +75.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +5.9% | +5.8% | -0.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | -4.2% | +3.0% | -0.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.1% | +0.1% | +4.3% | +9.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.6% | +9.4% | +7.7% | +14.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | +66.7% | +14.9% | +101.6% |
Valuation Metrics
HSIC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, HSIC's 10.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $170M | $5.7B | $8.1B | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $202M | $10.7B | $11.6B | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.38x | -15.59x | 21.56x | -115.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 165.91x | 20.10x | 13.26x | 370.67x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 6.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.27x | 17.50x | 10.87x | 77.75x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.65x | 1.11x | 0.61x | 2.63x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 27.75x | 0.86x | 1.79x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 78.85x | — | 14.12x | 29.15x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SMTI and HSIC and ATRC each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HSIC delivers a 8.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-179 for SMTI. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SMTI's 8.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ATRC scores 5/9 vs BLCO's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -178.6% | -3.4% | +8.2% | -1.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -49.2% | -1.6% | +3.6% | -0.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.8% | +1.2% | +7.1% | -0.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +15.6% | +1.6% | +9.8% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 8.13x | 0.82x | 0.77x | 0.18x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $32M | $5.0B | $3.5B | -$79M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $383M | $156M | $167M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $48M | $5.4B | $3.7B | $88M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.97x | 0.71x | 4.59x | 0.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HSIC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in HSIC five years ago would be worth $8,746 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,579 for ATRC. Over the past 12 months, BLCO leads with a +39.5% total return vs SMTI's -40.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HSIC at -4.0% vs SMTI's -20.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | -4.1% | -8.2% | -29.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -40.1% | +39.5% | +5.9% | -8.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.1% | -13.0% | -11.7% | -41.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -28.3% | -20.5% | -12.5% | -64.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +218.0% | -20.5% | +5.3% | +95.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.7% | -4.5% | -4.0% | -16.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — BLCO and HSIC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HSIC is the less volatile stock with a 0.73 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SMTI's 1.42 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BLCO currently trades 84.0% from its 52-week high vs SMTI's 53.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.42x | 1.39x | 0.73x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $35.95 | $18.92 | $89.29 | $43.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.04 | $10.85 | $61.95 | $26.62 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.1% | +84.0% | +79.0% | +64.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 51.3 | 46.9 | 39.1 | 45.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 57K | 412K | 1.2M | 669K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SMTI as "Buy", BLCO as "Hold", HSIC as "Hold", ATRC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.3% upside for ATRC (target: $51) vs 19.5% for BLCO (target: $19).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $32.00 | $19.00 | $86.43 | $50.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 16 | 32 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +10.5% | +0.8% |
HSIC leads in 2 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Total Returns. 3 categories are tied.
SMTI vs BLCO vs HSIC vs ATRC: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sanara MedTech Inc.
(SMTI) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC). Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC) offers the better valuation at 21. 6x trailing P/E (13. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sanara MedTech Inc. (SMTI) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC?
On forward P/E, Henry Schein, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 13. 3x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC?
Over the past 5 years, Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) delivered a total return of -12. 5%, compared to -64. 2% for AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMTI returned +218. 0% versus BLCO's -20. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 73β versus Sanara MedTech Inc. 's 1. 42β — meaning SMTI is approximately 94% more volatile than HSIC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 8% for Sanara MedTech Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sanara MedTech Inc.
(SMTI) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus 4. 0% for Henry Schein, Inc. (HSIC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to -282. 5% for Sanara MedTech Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTI leads at 31. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC?
Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 0% net margin versus -36. 4% for Sanara MedTech Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SMTI leads at 7. 1% versus -0. 6% for ATRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMTI leads at 92. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) trades at 13. 3x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 357. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ATRC: 82. 3% to $50. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SMTI or BLCO or HSIC or ATRC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Henry Schein, Inc.
(HSIC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 73)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HSIC: +5. 3%, BLCO: -20. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMTI and BLCO and HSIC and ATRC?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMTI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HSIC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.