Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SMTK
SmartKem, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-99.7%
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$71M
5Y Perf.-38.8%
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$688M
5Y Perf.-70.2%
OLED
Universal Display Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$4.32B
5Y Perf.-40.8%
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.

Electrical Equipment & Parts

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$668K
5Y Perf.-61.3%

SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SMTK logoSMTK
CBAT logoCBAT
MVST logoMVST
OLED logoOLED
SLDP logoSLDP
IndustrySemiconductorsElectrical Equipment & PartsElectrical Equipment & PartsSemiconductorsElectrical Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$2M$71M$688M$4.32B$668K
Revenue (TTM)$178K$162M$428M$627M$19M
Net Income (TTM)$-11M$-7M$-29M$214M$-91M
Gross Margin-62.4%10.8%28.6%73.5%-27.7%
Operating Margin-58.2%-10.5%1.6%35.6%-5.5%
Forward P/E6.1x35.5x21.7x
Total Debt$72K$30M$186M$43M$8M
Cash & Equiv.$7M$7M$105M$138M$47M

SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SMTK
CBAT
MVST
OLED
SLDP
StockFeb 22May 26Return
SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK)1000.3-99.7%
CBAK Energy Technol… (CBAT)10061.2-38.8%
Microvast Holdings,… (MVST)10029.8-70.2%
Universal Display C… (OLED)10059.2-40.8%
Solid Power, Inc. (SLDP)10038.7-61.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: OLED leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. SMTK and SLDP also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SMTK
SmartKem, Inc.
The Growth Play

SMTK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 203.7%, EPS growth 49.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 65.8%
  • 203.7% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
Best for: growth exposure
CBAT
CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
The Value Play

CBAT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and stability is your priority.

  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 1.01 vs SLDP's 2.92
Best for: value and stability
MVST
Microvast Holdings, Inc.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, MVST doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
OLED
Universal Display Corporation
The Income Pick

OLED carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 9 yrs, beta 1.33, yield 2.0%
  • 84.8% 10Y total return vs SLDP's -69.3%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.33, Low D/E 2.5%, current ratio 10.06x
  • Beta 1.33, yield 2.0%, current ratio 10.06x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
SLDP
Solid Power, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

SLDP is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +142.1% vs SMTK's -86.4%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthSMTK logoSMTK203.7% revenue growth vs CBAT's -13.6%
ValueCBAT logoCBATBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsOLED logoOLED34.1% margin vs SMTK's -62.6%
Stability / SafetyCBAT logoCBATBeta 1.01 vs SLDP's 2.92
DividendsOLED logoOLED2.0% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)SLDP logoSLDP+142.1% vs SMTK's -86.4%
Efficiency (ROA)OLED logoOLED11.0% ROA vs SMTK's -343.2%

SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SMTKSmartKem, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

CBATCBAK Energy Technology, Inc.
FY 2021
TotalHighPowerLithiumBatteriesUsedMember
39.8%$35M
UninterruptableSuppliesMember
38.1%$33M
PrecursorMember
10.4%$9M
CathodeMember
10.0%$9M
LightElectricVehiclesMember
0.8%$733,382
TradingOfRawMaterialsUsedInLithiumBatteriesMember
0.6%$519,796
ElectricVehiclesMember
0.3%$243,837
MVSTMicrovast Holdings, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

OLEDUniversal Display Corporation
FY 2025
Material Sales
54.3%$353M
Royalty And License Fees
42.3%$275M
Contract Research Services
3.5%$23M
SLDPSolid Power, Inc.
FY 2025
Government Contract
100.0%$2M

SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLOLEDLAGGINGSLDP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

OLED is the larger business by revenue, generating $627M annually — 3519.9x SMTK's $178,000. OLED is the more profitable business, keeping 34.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMTK's -62.6%. On growth, CBAT holds the edge at +36.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSMTK logoSMTKSmartKem, Inc.CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$178,000$162M$428M$627M$19M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$10M-$8M$32M$259M-$83M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$11M-$7M-$29M$214M-$91M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$8M$56M$237M-$75M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-62.4%+10.8%+28.6%+73.5%-27.7%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-58.2%-10.5%+1.6%+35.6%-5.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-62.6%-4.0%-6.8%+34.1%-4.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-42.1%-5.1%+13.1%+37.8%-4.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.5%-15.0%-14.5%-48.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+47.7%+119.2%-43.7%+25.0%
OLED leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CBAT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 6.1x trailing earnings, CBAT trades at a 66% valuation discount to OLED's 18.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CBAT's 5.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MVST's 110.2x.

MetricSMTK logoSMTKSmartKem, Inc.CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.
Market CapShares × price$2M$71M$688M$4.3B$668,194
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$5M$94M$769M$4.2B-$38M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.10x6.08x-23.67x18.06x-6.03x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.35.50x21.66x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple5.25x110.15x14.21x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue21.61x0.40x1.61x6.64x0.03x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.16x0.59x1.68x2.48x1.37x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF3.15x12.27x27.99x
CBAT leads this category, winning 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

OLED delivers a 12.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-141 for SMTK. SMTK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MVST's 0.45x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CBAT scores 7/9 vs OLED's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSMTK logoSMTKSmartKem, Inc.CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-140.5%-5.5%-7.4%+12.3%-21.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.4%-2.0%-2.9%+11.0%-23.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+4.6%+0.9%+11.7%-19.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-129.8%+7.0%+1.2%+14.0%-23.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–947545
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.25x0.45x0.02x0.02x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$7M$23M$81M-$95M-$39M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$7M$7M$105M$138M$47M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$72,000$30M$186M$43M$8M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13274.00x-24.86x-16.53x-488.79x
OLED leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — MVST and OLED each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in OLED five years ago would be worth $4,832 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $36 for SMTK. Over the past 12 months, SLDP leads with a +142.1% total return vs SMTK's -86.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MVST at 21.4% vs SMTK's -60.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSMTK logoSMTKSmartKem, Inc.CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-73.4%-8.1%-24.5%-24.3%-33.9%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-86.4%-8.1%+1.9%-34.2%+142.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-94.0%+2.6%+79.0%-30.6%+37.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-78.7%-81.5%-51.7%-69.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.6%-69.7%-78.2%+84.8%-69.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-60.8%+0.9%+21.4%-11.5%+11.3%
Evenly matched — MVST and OLED each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

CBAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

CBAT is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SLDP's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CBAT currently trades 63.2% from its 52-week high vs SMTK's 8.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSMTK logoSMTKSmartKem, Inc.CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.97x1.01x2.42x1.33x2.92x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.80$1.25$7.12$163.21$8.86
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.15$0.77$1.37$83.64$1.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+8.3%+63.2%+29.9%+56.2%+34.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.138.450.944.936.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded688K110K4.0M823K5.7M
CBAT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: MVST as "Buy", OLED as "Buy", SLDP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.4% upside for MVST (target: $5) vs 53.7% for OLED (target: $141). OLED is the only dividend payer here at 1.96% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSMTK logoSMTKSmartKem, Inc.CBAT logoCBATCBAK Energy Techn…MVST logoMVSTMicrovast Holding…OLED logoOLEDUniversal Display…SLDP logoSLDPSolid Power, Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$4.80$141.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts6195
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+2.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises19
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.80
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%+0.8%+100.0%
OLED leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

OLED leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CBAT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.

Best OverallUniversal Display Corporati… (OLED)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SMTK vs CBAT vs MVST vs OLED vs SLDP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, SmartKem, Inc.

(SMTK) is the stronger pick with 203. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT) offers the better valuation at 6. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP?

On trailing P/E, CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the cheapest at 6. 1x versus Universal Display Corporation at 18. 1x. On forward P/E, Universal Display Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP?

Over the past 5 years, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) delivered a total return of -51.

7%, compared to -99. 6% for SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OLED returned +84. 8% versus SMTK's -99. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CBAK Energy Technology, Inc.

(CBAT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Solid Power, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning SLDP is approximately 191% more volatile than CBAT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SmartKem, Inc. (SMTK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 45% for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), SmartKem, Inc.

(SMTK) is pulling ahead at 203. 7% versus -13. 6% for CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. (CBAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CBAK Energy Technology, Inc. grew EPS 574. 5% year-over-year, compared to 5. 6% for Solid Power, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SMTK leads at 65. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP?

Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the more profitable company, earning 37.

2% net margin versus -126. 0% for SmartKem, Inc. — meaning it keeps 37. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OLED leads at 38. 5% versus -127. 6% for SMTK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — OLED leads at 73. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) trades at 21.

7x forward P/E versus 35. 5x for Microvast Holdings, Inc. — 13. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MVST: 125. 4% to $4. 80.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP?

In this comparison, OLED (2.

0% yield) pays a dividend. SMTK, CBAT, MVST, SLDP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SMTK or CBAT or MVST or OLED or SLDP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Universal Display Corporation (OLED) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2.

0% yield). Microvast Holdings, Inc. (MVST) carries a higher beta of 2. 42 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (OLED: +84. 8%, MVST: -78. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SMTK and CBAT and MVST and OLED and SLDP?

These companies operate in different sectors (SMTK (Technology) and CBAT (Industrials) and MVST (Industrials) and OLED (Technology) and SLDP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SMTK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CBAT is a small-cap deep-value stock; MVST is a small-cap quality compounder stock; OLED is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLDP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. OLED pays a dividend while SMTK, CBAT, MVST, SLDP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SMTK

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 101%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CBAT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MVST

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 17%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

OLED

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 20%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

SLDP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SMTK and CBAT and MVST and OLED and SLDP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SMTK: 203.7% · CBAT: 36.5%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.