Solar
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
Solar
Solar
SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $32M | $866M | $23.06B | $3.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $51M | $315M | $5.42B | $3.17B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-42M | $1.67B | $568M |
| Gross Margin | 7.7% | 50.4% | 41.7% | 23.5% |
| Operating Margin | -13.1% | -2.7% | 33.0% | -1.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.1x | 12.0x | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $35M | $188M | $499M | $14.89B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $786K | $10M | $2.80B | $1.24B |
SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solarmax Technology… (SMXT) | 100 | 12.2 | -87.8% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 96.2 | -3.8% |
| First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) | 100 | 139.4 | +39.4% |
| Sunrun Inc. (RUN) | 100 | 114.6 | +14.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SMXT is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.
- Beta 1.11 vs RUN's 2.89
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.13
- Lower P/E (5.1x vs 22.8x)
FSLR has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 324.1% 10Y total return vs RUN's 86.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.39, Low D/E 5.2%, current ratio 2.67x
- Beta 1.39, current ratio 2.67x
- 30.7% margin vs SMXT's -18.4%
RUN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 45.1%, EPS growth 113.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.4%
- 45.1% revenue growth vs SMXT's -57.5%
- +86.7% vs SMXT's -49.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 45.1% revenue growth vs SMXT's -57.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.1x vs 22.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.7% margin vs SMXT's -18.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.11 vs RUN's 2.89 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +86.7% vs SMXT's -49.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC 17.6% vs -5.3% |
SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories
SMXT leads 0 • SPWR leads 0 • RUN leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FSLR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.4B annually — 106.6x SMXT's $51M. FSLR is the more profitable business, keeping 30.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SMXT's -18.4%. On growth, SMXT holds the edge at +3.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $51M | $315M | $5.4B | $3.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$6M | $2.2B | $541M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$42M | $1.7B | $568M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | -$15M | $1.7B | -$326M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +50.4% | +41.7% | +23.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -13.1% | -2.7% | +33.0% | -1.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.4% | -13.2% | +30.7% | +17.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | -4.6% | +30.8% | -10.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.8% | -0.2% | +23.6% | +43.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +76.5% | -101.3% | +65.1% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SPWR and RUN each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 8.1x trailing earnings, RUN trades at a 47% valuation discount to FSLR's 15.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FSLR's 9.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than RUN's 24.3x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $32M | $866M | $23.1B | $3.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $66M | $1.0B | $20.8B | $16.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.77x | -15.25x | 15.10x | 8.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.10x | 12.04x | 22.75x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.49x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.38x | 24.31x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.41x | 2.80x | 4.42x | 1.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 2.42x | 0.75x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 19.42x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FSLR delivers a 18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $12 for RUN. FSLR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RUN's 2.99x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FSLR scores 7/9 vs SMXT's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | +18.0% | +12.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.9% | -19.5% | +12.6% | +2.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -117.0% | -5.3% | +17.6% | -0.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -7.2% | -7.2% | +15.9% | -0.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.05x | 2.99x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $34M | $179M | -$2.3B | $13.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $786,333 | $10M | $2.8B | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $188M | $499M | $14.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.61x | -1.57x | 53.51x | -0.02x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FSLR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FSLR five years ago would be worth $28,755 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,489 for SMXT. Over the past 12 months, RUN leads with a +86.7% total return vs SMXT's -49.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FSLR at 6.5% vs SMXT's -47.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -32.3% | -38.2% | -21.8% | -29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -49.5% | -42.4% | +65.3% | +86.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -81.3% | +20.9% | -19.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -81.3% | +187.6% | -69.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.1% | -81.3% | +324.1% | +86.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.0% | -42.8% | +6.5% | -7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SMXT and FSLR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SMXT is the less volatile stock with a 1.11 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RUN's 2.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FSLR currently trades 75.0% from its 52-week high vs SMXT's 23.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.11x | 2.13x | 1.39x | 2.89x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.50 | $2.27 | $285.99 | $22.44 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.48 | $0.81 | $125.80 | $5.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +23.8% | +44.9% | +75.0% | +61.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 45.9 | 64.3 | 49.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 176K | 1.7M | 2.1M | 10.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPWR as "Hold", FSLR as "Buy", RUN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 1450.0% upside for SPWR (target: $16) vs 23.1% for FSLR (target: $264).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.81 | $264.13 | $18.14 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 | 73 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.1% | 0.0% |
FSLR leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
SMXT vs SPWR vs FSLR vs RUN: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the stronger pick with 45. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -57. 5% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Sunrun Inc. (RUN) offers the better valuation at 8. 1x trailing P/E (22. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) a "Buy" — based on 73 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?
On trailing P/E, Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is the cheapest at 8. 1x versus First Solar, Inc. at 15. 1x. On forward P/E, SunPower Inc. is actually cheaper at 5. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?
Over the past 5 years, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) delivered a total return of +187. 6%, compared to -85. 1% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FSLR returned +324. 1% versus SMXT's -85. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Solarmax Technology Inc.
Common Stock (SMXT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 11β versus Sunrun Inc. 's 2. 89β — meaning RUN is approximately 160% more volatile than SMXT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 3% for Sunrun Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Sunrun Inc.
(RUN) is pulling ahead at 45. 1% versus -57. 5% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock (SMXT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sunrun Inc. grew EPS 113. 3% year-over-year, compared to 0. 0% for SunPower Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?
First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the more profitable company, earning 29. 3% net margin versus -152. 1% for Solarmax Technology Inc. Common Stock — meaning it keeps 29. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FSLR leads at 32. 3% versus -144. 0% for SMXT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) trades at 5. 1x forward P/E versus 22. 8x for Sunrun Inc. — 17. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SPWR: 1450. 0% to $15. 81.
08Which pays a better dividend — SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is SMXT or SPWR or FSLR or RUN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Solar, Inc.
(FSLR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+324. 1% 10Y return). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FSLR: +324. 1%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SMXT and SPWR and FSLR and RUN?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SMXT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPWR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; FSLR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; RUN is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.