Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Machinery
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $19.30B | $73.64B | $79.02B | $12.47B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.12B | $16.22B | $18.32B | $15.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $3.13B | $2.44B | $371M |
| Gross Margin | 51.3% | 44.1% | 52.7% | 30.0% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 26.4% | 19.8% | 7.8% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 22.7x | 21.7x | 17.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $8.97B | $13.76B | $5.86B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.62B | $851M | $1.54B | $280M |
SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 4.79x
- PEG 1.78 vs EMR's 4.81
- 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.67, yield 2.4%
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83
- 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8%
EMR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 17.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.3%
- 206.6% 10Y total return vs SNA's 166.1%
- 3.0% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5%
SWK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 21.7x)
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%
- +41.7% vs ITW's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.0% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +41.7% vs ITW's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8% |
SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWK leads in 1 of 6 categories
EMR leads 1 • SNA leads 0 • ITW leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW and EMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.3B annually — 3.6x SNA's $5.1B. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWK's 2.4%. On growth, ITW holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.1B | $16.2B | $18.3B | $15.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $4.6B | $4.7B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $3.1B | $2.4B | $371M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $2.2B | $3.1B | $726M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.3% | +44.1% | +52.7% | +30.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +26.4% | +19.8% | +7.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +19.3% | +13.3% | +2.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +13.6% | +17.0% | +4.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +4.6% | +2.9% | +2.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +11.8% | +28.2% | -35.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, SNA trades at a 45% valuation discount to EMR's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SNA offers better value at 1.77x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.3B | $73.6B | $79.0B | $12.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.0B | $81.8B | $91.2B | $18.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.32x | 24.36x | 34.92x | 30.26x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.40x | 22.68x | 21.71x | 17.64x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.77x | 2.53x | 7.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.33x | 17.74x | 18.07x | 11.71x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.74x | 4.59x | 4.39x | 0.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 23.15x | 3.94x | 1.35x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.19x | 27.20x | 29.63x | 18.12x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMR scores 7/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +97.4% | +12.1% | +4.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.2% | +19.4% | +5.8% | +1.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +29.0% | +8.2% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +38.7% | +10.0% | +7.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 2.78x | 0.68x | 0.65x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | $8.1B | $12.2B | $5.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $851M | $1.5B | $280M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $9.0B | $13.8B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.12x | 14.53x | 6.46x | 2.07x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
EMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNA five years ago would be worth $16,152 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, SWK leads with a +41.7% total return vs ITW's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EMR at 20.7% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +3.1% | +4.3% | +5.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | +9.0% | +30.4% | +41.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | +19.5% | +75.9% | +6.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +18.9% | +59.5% | -56.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.1% | +189.4% | +206.6% | -1.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +6.1% | +20.7% | +2.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNA currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 0.67x | 1.52x | 1.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $400.88 | $303.16 | $165.15 | $93.37 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $301.82 | $236.68 | $108.37 | $58.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +84.3% | +85.4% | +85.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 45.3 | 61.3 | 61.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 370K | 1.2M | 2.8M | 2.0M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — EMR and SWK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNA as "Buy", ITW as "Hold", EMR as "Buy", SWK as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for EMR (target: $162) vs 7.1% for ITW (target: $274). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs EMR's 1.49%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $413.00 | $273.67 | $161.92 | $89.17 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 28 | 41 | 37 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +2.4% | +1.5% | +4.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 12 | 37 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.72 | $6.11 | $2.10 | $3.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +2.0% | +1.6% | +0.1% |
SWK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 4 tied.
SNA vs ITW vs EMR vs SWK: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK?
On trailing P/E, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Emerson Electric Co. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Snap-on Incorporated wins at 1. 78x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK?
Over the past 5 years, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) delivered a total return of +61.
5%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EMR returned +206. 6% versus SWK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 173% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -10. 4% for Illinois Tool Works Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMR leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 2. 7% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 6% for SWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 78x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 7x for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — 5. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 8% to $161. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 5% for Emerson Electric Co. (EMR).
09Is SNA or ITW or EMR or SWK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 4% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +189. 4%, SWK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNA and ITW and EMR and SWK?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.