Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Industrial - Machinery
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Industrial - Machinery
SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Industrial - Machinery |
| Market Cap | $19.30B | $14.86B | $73.64B | $12.47B | $79.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.12B | $4.35B | $16.22B | $15.23B | $18.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1.02B | $538M | $3.13B | $371M | $2.44B |
| Gross Margin | 51.3% | 36.1% | 44.1% | 30.0% | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 24.7% | 17.1% | 26.4% | 7.8% | 19.8% |
| Forward P/E | 19.4x | 25.1x | 22.7x | 17.6x | 21.7x |
| Total Debt | $1.33B | $1.29B | $8.97B | $5.86B | $13.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $1.62B | $309M | $851M | $280M | $1.54B |
SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) | 100 | 285.9 | +185.9% |
| Lincoln Electric Ho… (LECO) | 100 | 330.0 | +230.0% |
| Illinois Tool Works… (ITW) | 100 | 148.2 | +48.2% |
| Stanley Black & Dec… (SWK) | 100 | 63.9 | -36.1% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNA is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 2.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 22.3%, current ratio 4.79x
- 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4%
LECO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 5.5%, EPS growth 14.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 389.7% 10Y total return vs EMR's 206.6%
- PEG 1.13 vs EMR's 4.81
- 5.5% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5%
ITW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if defensive is your priority.
- Beta 0.67, yield 2.4%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83
- 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8%
SWK ranks third and is worth considering specifically for value and dividends.
- Lower P/E (17.6x vs 21.7x)
- 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5%
Among these 5 stocks, EMR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.5% revenue growth vs SWK's -1.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (17.6x vs 21.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 20.0% margin vs SWK's 2.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.67 vs SWK's 1.83 | |
| Dividends | 4.1% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs EMR's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +51.1% vs ITW's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs SWK's 1.7%, ROIC 29.0% vs 5.8% |
SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SWK leads in 1 of 6 categories
ITW leads 1 • LECO leads 1 • SNA leads 0 • EMR leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNA and EMR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.3B annually — 4.2x LECO's $4.3B. SNA is the more profitable business, keeping 20.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SWK's 2.4%. On growth, LECO holds the edge at +11.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.1B | $4.3B | $16.2B | $15.2B | $18.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.4B | $845M | $4.6B | $1.7B | $4.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1.0B | $538M | $3.1B | $371M | $2.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $438M | $2.2B | $726M | $3.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +51.3% | +36.1% | +44.1% | +30.0% | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +17.1% | +26.4% | +7.8% | +19.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.0% | +12.4% | +19.3% | +2.4% | +13.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.0% | +10.1% | +13.6% | +4.8% | +17.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.9% | +11.6% | +4.6% | +2.7% | +2.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.0% | +17.6% | +11.8% | -35.0% | +28.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SWK leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.3x trailing earnings, SNA trades at a 45% valuation discount to EMR's 34.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LECO offers better value at 1.31x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $19.3B | $14.9B | $73.6B | $12.5B | $79.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $19.0B | $15.8B | $81.8B | $18.0B | $91.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.32x | 29.09x | 24.36x | 30.26x | 34.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 19.40x | 25.06x | 22.68x | 17.64x | 21.71x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.77x | 1.31x | 2.53x | — | 7.73x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.33x | 19.48x | 17.74x | 11.71x | 18.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.74x | 3.51x | 4.59x | 0.82x | 4.39x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.30x | 10.31x | 23.15x | 1.35x | 3.94x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 19.19x | 27.82x | 27.20x | 18.12x | 29.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ITW delivers a 97.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $97 in annual profit, vs $4 for SWK. SNA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ITW's 2.78x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EMR scores 7/9 vs ITW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +17.4% | +37.3% | +97.4% | +4.1% | +12.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.2% | +14.2% | +19.4% | +1.7% | +5.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +18.1% | +22.7% | +29.0% | +5.8% | +8.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +18.4% | +26.2% | +38.7% | +7.0% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 0.88x | 2.78x | 0.65x | 0.68x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$298M | $985M | $8.1B | $5.6B | $12.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $1.6B | $309M | $851M | $280M | $1.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $1.3B | $9.0B | $5.9B | $13.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 27.12x | 12.38x | 14.53x | 2.07x | 6.46x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LECO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LECO five years ago would be worth $21,237 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,381 for SWK. Over the past 12 months, LECO leads with a +51.1% total return vs ITW's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors EMR at 20.7% vs SWK's 2.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | +11.5% | +3.1% | +5.9% | +4.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +20.8% | +51.1% | +9.0% | +41.7% | +30.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +52.0% | +65.1% | +19.5% | +6.9% | +75.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.5% | +112.4% | +18.9% | -56.2% | +59.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.1% | +389.7% | +189.4% | -1.5% | +206.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +15.0% | +18.2% | +6.1% | +2.2% | +20.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNA and ITW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ITW is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SWK's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNA currently trades 92.5% from its 52-week high vs ITW's 84.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.13x | 0.67x | 1.83x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $400.88 | $310.00 | $303.16 | $93.37 | $165.15 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $301.82 | $180.17 | $236.68 | $58.23 | $108.37 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.5% | +87.5% | +84.3% | +85.9% | +85.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.2 | 63.6 | 45.3 | 61.0 | 61.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 370K | 348K | 1.2M | 2.0M | 2.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SWK and EMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SNA as "Buy", LECO as "Hold", ITW as "Hold", SWK as "Hold", EMR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 14.8% upside for EMR (target: $162) vs 7.1% for ITW (target: $274). For income investors, SWK offers the higher dividend yield at 4.10% vs LECO's 1.11%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $413.00 | $301.71 | $273.67 | $89.17 | $161.92 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 22 | 28 | 37 | 41 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.4% | +1.1% | +2.4% | +4.1% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 16 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 37 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $8.72 | $3.01 | $6.11 | $3.29 | $2.10 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.7% | +2.3% | +2.0% | +0.1% | +1.6% |
SWK leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). ITW leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
SNA vs LECO vs ITW vs SWK vs EMR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
(LECO) is the stronger pick with 5. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) offers the better valuation at 19. 3x trailing P/E (19. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) a "Buy" — based on 17 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR?
On trailing P/E, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the cheapest at 19.
3x versus Emerson Electric Co. at 34. 9x. On forward P/E, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. is actually cheaper at 17. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. wins at 1. 13x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR?
Over the past 5 years, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
(LECO) delivered a total return of +112. 4%, compared to -56. 2% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LECO returned +389. 7% versus SWK's -1. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 67β versus Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. 's 1. 83β — meaning SWK is approximately 173% more volatile than ITW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Illinois Tool Works Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
(LECO) is pulling ahead at 5. 5% versus -1. 5% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. grew EPS 35. 9% year-over-year, compared to -10. 4% for Illinois Tool Works Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EMR leads at 9. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR?
Snap-on Incorporated (SNA) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
7% net margin versus 2. 7% for Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ITW leads at 26. 3% versus 7. 6% for SWK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 13x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) trades at 17. 6x forward P/E versus 25. 1x for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. — 7. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EMR: 14. 8% to $161. 92.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 1. 1% for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO).
09Is SNA or LECO or ITW or SWK or EMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Illinois Tool Works Inc.
(ITW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 67), 2. 4% yield, +189. 4% 10Y return). Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ITW: +189. 4%, SWK: -1. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNA and LECO and ITW and SWK and EMR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SNA is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LECO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ITW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SWK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.