Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDR vs JBHT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Integrated Freight & Logistics
SNDR vs JBHT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Integrated Freight & Logistics |
| Market Cap | $5.37B | $22.91B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.67B | $12.00B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $598M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 14.0% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 7.2% |
| Forward P/E | 35.5x | 33.0x |
| Total Debt | $560M | $1.47B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $17M |
SNDR vs JBHT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider National,… (SNDR) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| J.B. Hunt Transport… (JBHT) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDR vs JBHT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 18.5%, current ratio 2.13x
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.2%, current ratio 2.13x
JBHT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.07, yield 0.7%
- 203.9% 10Y total return vs SNDR's 86.1%
- Lower P/E (33.0x vs 35.5x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs JBHT's -0.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (33.0x vs 35.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs SNDR's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.07 vs SNDR's 1.27 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JBHT's 0.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +83.5% vs SNDR's +38.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 7.5% ROA vs SNDR's 2.0%, ROIC 12.0% vs 3.7% |
SNDR vs JBHT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNDR vs JBHT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNDR and JBHT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JBHT is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.0B annually — 2.1x SNDR's $5.7B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 5.0% (JBHT) to 1.7% (SNDR).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $12.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $608M | $1.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $598M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $493M | $948M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +14.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +7.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | +7.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | +24.2% |
Valuation Metrics
SNDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 39.6x trailing earnings, JBHT trades at a 24% valuation discount to SNDR's 51.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SNDR's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JBHT's 15.4x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $22.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $24.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.95x | 39.57x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.49x | 33.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 7.55x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.26x | 15.42x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.95x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 6.64x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | 24.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JBHT leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
JBHT delivers a 16.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $3 for SNDR. SNDR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JBHT's 0.41x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +16.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +7.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +12.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +13.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.41x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $359M | $1.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $17M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $560M | $1.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.92x | 12.19x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JBHT leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JBHT five years ago would be worth $14,024 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,324 for SNDR. Over the past 12 months, JBHT leads with a +83.5% total return vs SNDR's +38.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JBHT at 11.5% vs SNDR's 6.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | +23.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.5% | +83.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | +38.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | +40.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.1% | +203.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | +11.5% |
Risk & Volatility
JBHT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
JBHT is the less volatile stock with a 1.07 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNDR's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.07x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.34 | $256.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.11 | $130.12 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 58.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 963K | 902K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SNDR and JBHT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNDR as "Hold" and JBHT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.2% upside for SNDR (target: $30) vs -7.1% for JBHT (target: $225). For income investors, SNDR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs JBHT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.67 | $224.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $1.75 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
JBHT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). SNDR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SNDR vs JBHT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDR or JBHT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -0. 7% for J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT). J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) offers the better valuation at 39. 6x trailing P/E (33. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) a "Buy" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNDR or JBHT?
On trailing P/E, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the cheapest at 39. 6x versus Schneider National, Inc. at 51. 9x. On forward P/E, J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 33. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNDR or JBHT?
Over the past 5 years, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) delivered a total return of +40. 2%, compared to +23. 2% for Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JBHT returned +203. 9% versus SNDR's +86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNDR or JBHT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 07β versus Schneider National, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning SNDR is approximately 19% more volatile than JBHT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 41% for J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNDR or JBHT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -0. 7% for J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. grew EPS 10. 1% year-over-year, compared to -10. 6% for Schneider National, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNDR leads at -4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNDR or JBHT?
J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus 1. 8% for Schneider National, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JBHT leads at 7. 2% versus 3. 0% for SNDR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JBHT leads at 10. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNDR or JBHT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) trades at 33. 0x forward P/E versus 35. 5x for Schneider National, Inc. — 2. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNDR: -3. 2% to $29. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNDR or JBHT?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 0. 7% for J. B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT).
09Is SNDR or JBHT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, J.
B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. (JBHT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 07), 0. 7% yield, +203. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (JBHT: +203. 9%, SNDR: +86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNDR and JBHT?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.