Trucking
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SNDR vs MRTN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Trucking
SNDR vs MRTN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Trucking | Trucking |
| Market Cap | $5.37B | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.67B | $884M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $98M | $17M |
| Gross Margin | 22.8% | 5.7% |
| Operating Margin | 2.8% | 1.2% |
| Forward P/E | 35.5x | 54.4x |
| Total Debt | $560M | $388K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $43M |
SNDR vs MRTN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schneider National,… (SNDR) | 100 | 126.8 | +26.8% |
| Marten Transport, L… (MRTN) | 100 | 88.7 | -11.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNDR vs MRTN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SNDR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.2%
- Rev growth 7.3%, EPS growth -10.6%, 3Y rev CAGR -4.9%
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.2%, current ratio 2.13x
MRTN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 144.8% 10Y total return vs SNDR's 86.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.16, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 1.86x
- 2.0% margin vs SNDR's 1.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 7.3% revenue growth vs MRTN's -8.3% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (35.5x vs 54.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 2.0% margin vs SNDR's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.16 vs SNDR's 1.27, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs MRTN's 1.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.5% vs MRTN's +21.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.0% ROA vs MRTN's 1.8%, ROIC 3.7% vs 1.1% |
SNDR vs MRTN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SNDR vs MRTN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNDR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.7B annually — 6.4x MRTN's $884M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 2.0% (MRTN) to 1.7% (SNDR). On growth, SNDR holds the edge at -0.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $5.7B | $884M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $608M | $116M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $98M | $17M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $493M | -$51M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +22.8% | +5.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.8% | +1.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +8.7% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.2% | -8.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -20.0% | -34.4% |
Valuation Metrics
SNDR leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 51.9x trailing earnings, SNDR trades at a 28% valuation discount to MRTN's 72.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SNDR's 9.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MRTN's 10.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.4B | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.7B | $1.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 51.95x | 72.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 35.49x | 54.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.26x | 10.26x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.95x | 1.40x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.78x | 1.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.43x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SNDR leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SNDR delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $2 for MRTN. MRTN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SNDR's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNDR scores 7/9 vs MRTN's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.2% | +2.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.0% | +1.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.7% | +1.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.9% | +1.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $359M | -$43M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $43M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $560M | $388,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.92x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNDR five years ago would be worth $12,324 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,475 for MRTN. Over the past 12 months, SNDR leads with a +38.5% total return vs MRTN's +21.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNDR at 6.2% vs MRTN's -8.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.0% | +32.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +38.5% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +19.9% | -22.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.2% | -5.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +86.1% | +144.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +6.2% | -8.3% |
Risk & Volatility
MRTN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MRTN is the less volatile stock with a 1.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNDR's 1.27 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MRTN currently trades 98.2% from its 52-week high vs SNDR's 91.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.27x | 1.16x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.34 | $15.42 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.11 | $9.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +91.9% | +98.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.5 | 63.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 963K | 750K |
Analyst Outlook
SNDR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNDR as "Hold" and MRTN as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for MRTN (target: $23) vs -3.2% for SNDR (target: $30). For income investors, SNDR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.24% vs MRTN's 1.19%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.67 | $22.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 25 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.38 | $0.18 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% |
SNDR leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MRTN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility).
SNDR vs MRTN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNDR or MRTN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is the stronger pick with 7. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 3% for Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN). Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) offers the better valuation at 51. 9x trailing P/E (35. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) a "Hold" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SNDR or MRTN?
On trailing P/E, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is the cheapest at 51. 9x versus Marten Transport, Ltd. at 72. 1x. On forward P/E, Schneider National, Inc. is actually cheaper at 35. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SNDR or MRTN?
Over the past 5 years, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) delivered a total return of +23. 2%, compared to -5. 3% for Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MRTN returned +144. 8% versus SNDR's +86. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SNDR or MRTN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Marten Transport, Ltd.
(MRTN) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 16β versus Schneider National, Inc. 's 1. 27β — meaning SNDR is approximately 10% more volatile than MRTN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 19% for Schneider National, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SNDR or MRTN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) is pulling ahead at 7. 3% versus -8. 3% for Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Schneider National, Inc. grew EPS -10. 6% year-over-year, compared to -36. 4% for Marten Transport, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNDR leads at -4. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SNDR or MRTN?
Marten Transport, Ltd.
(MRTN) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 0% net margin versus 1. 8% for Schneider National, Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SNDR leads at 3. 0% versus 1. 2% for MRTN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MRTN leads at 5. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SNDR or MRTN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Schneider National, Inc.
(SNDR) trades at 35. 5x forward P/E versus 54. 4x for Marten Transport, Ltd. — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MRTN: 48. 6% to $22. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — SNDR or MRTN?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Schneider National, Inc. (SNDR) offers the highest yield at 1. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Marten Transport, Ltd. (MRTN).
09Is SNDR or MRTN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Marten Transport, Ltd.
(MRTN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 16), 1. 2% yield, +144. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MRTN: +144. 8%, SNDR: +86. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SNDR and MRTN?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.