SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$52.21B
5Y Perf.-56.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SNOW vs GTLB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GTLB
GitLab Inc.
Software - Application
Market Cap$4.31B
5Y Perf.-76.8%
SNOW vs GTLB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SNOW | GTLB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $52.21B | $4.31B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.68B | $957M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1.33B | $-56M |
| Gross Margin | 67.2% | 87.5% |
| Operating Margin | -30.6% | -12.2% |
| Forward P/E | 85.1x | 32.3x |
| Total Debt | $2.74B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2.83B | $230M |
SNOW vs GTLB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SNOW
GTLB
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) | 100 | 43.1 | -56.9% |
| GitLab Inc. (GTLB) | 100 | 23.2 | -76.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SNOW vs GTLB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GTLB leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Snowflake Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SNOW
Snowflake Inc.
The Growth Play
SNOW is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 29.2%, EPS growth -2.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 31.4%
- -40.0% 10Y total return vs GTLB's -75.0%
- 29.2% revenue growth vs GTLB's 26.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
GTLB
GitLab Inc.
The Income Pick
GTLB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 1.17
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, current ratio 2.54x
- Beta 1.17, current ratio 2.54x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SNOW | 29.2% revenue growth vs GTLB's 26.0% |
| Value | GTLB | Lower P/E (32.3x vs 85.1x) |
| Quality / Margins | GTLB | -5.8% margin vs SNOW's -28.4% |
| Stability / Safety | GTLB | Beta 1.17 vs SNOW's 1.32 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SNOW | -12.4% vs GTLB's -47.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GTLB | -3.6% ROA vs SNOW's -14.6%, ROIC -12.5% vs -43.1% |
SNOW vs GTLB — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
SNOW vs GTLB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGTLBLAGGINGSNOW
SNOWSnowflake Inc.
1leads
GTLBGitLab Inc.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SNOWMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
Tied
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
GTLB5/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GTLB6/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SNOW5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — SNOW and GTLB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SNOW is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 4.9x GTLB's $957M. GTLB is the more profitable business, keeping -5.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SNOW's -28.4%. On growth, SNOW holds the edge at +30.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | SNOWSnowflake Inc. | GTLBGitLab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $957M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$1.3B | -$104M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1.3B | -$56M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.1B | $222M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +67.2% | +87.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -30.6% | -12.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -28.4% | -5.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.1% | +23.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +9.1% | -133.3% |
Evenly matched — SNOW and GTLB each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
GTLB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SNOWSnowflake Inc. | GTLBGitLab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $52.2B | $4.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $52.1B | $4.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -38.59x | -74.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 85.10x | 32.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 11.15x | 4.50x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 25.48x | 4.16x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 46.60x | 19.40x |
GTLB leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTLB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GTLB delivers a -5.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-6 in annual profit, vs $-66 for SNOW. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SNOW scores 5/9 vs GTLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | SNOWSnowflake Inc. | GTLBGitLab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -65.9% | -5.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -14.6% | -3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -43.1% | -12.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -27.5% | -12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.36x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$87M | -$230M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2.8B | $230M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.7B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -115.44x | — |
GTLB leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SNOW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SNOW five years ago would be worth $7,866 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,501 for GTLB. Over the past 12 months, SNOW leads with a -12.4% total return vs GTLB's -47.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SNOW at -1.7% vs GTLB's -4.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SNOWSnowflake Inc. | GTLBGitLab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -29.7% | -28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.4% | -47.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.0% | -14.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.3% | -75.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -40.0% | -75.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.7% | -4.9% |
SNOW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SNOW and GTLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GTLB is the less volatile stock with a 1.17 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SNOW's 1.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SNOW currently trades 54.3% from its 52-week high vs GTLB's 48.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SNOWSnowflake Inc. | GTLBGitLab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.32x | 1.17x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $280.67 | $54.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $118.30 | $18.74 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +54.3% | +48.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.0 | 65.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.5M | 6.4M |
Evenly matched — SNOW and GTLB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates SNOW as "Buy" and GTLB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.0% upside for SNOW (target: $235) vs 39.1% for GTLB (target: $36).
| Metric | SNOWSnowflake Inc. | GTLBGitLab Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $234.79 | $36.13 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 50 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +0.3% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
GTLB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). SNOW leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallGitLab Inc. (GTLB)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SNOW vs GTLB: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SNOW or GTLB a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Snowflake Inc.
(SNOW) is the stronger pick with 29. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 26. 0% for GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Analysts rate Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) a "Buy" — based on 50 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SNOW or GTLB?
Over the past 5 years, Snowflake Inc.
(SNOW) delivered a total return of -21. 3%, compared to -75. 0% for GitLab Inc. (GTLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNOW returned -40. 0% versus GTLB's -75. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SNOW or GTLB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 17β versus Snowflake Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning SNOW is approximately 13% more volatile than GTLB relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SNOW or GTLB?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Snowflake Inc.
(SNOW) is pulling ahead at 29. 2% versus 26. 0% for GitLab Inc. (GTLB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Snowflake Inc. grew EPS -2. 3% year-over-year, compared to -775. 0% for GitLab Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNOW leads at 31. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SNOW or GTLB?
GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is the more profitable company, earning -5. 8% net margin versus -28. 4% for Snowflake Inc. — meaning it keeps -5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GTLB leads at -12. 2% versus -30. 6% for SNOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GTLB leads at 87. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SNOW or GTLB more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) trades at 32. 3x forward P/E versus 85. 1x for Snowflake Inc. — 52. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SNOW: 54. 0% to $234. 79.
07Which pays a better dividend — SNOW or GTLB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is SNOW or GTLB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GitLab Inc.
(GTLB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 17)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GTLB: -75. 0%, SNOW: -40. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SNOW and GTLB?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(SNOW: 30.1% · GTLB: 23.9%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.