SNX vs AVT

For growth investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger pick with 6.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) offers the better valuation at 24. 0x trailing P/E (14. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the cheapest at 24.

0x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 9x. On forward P/E, TD SYNNEX Corporation is actually cheaper at 14. 3x.

Over the past 5 years, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) delivered a total return of +104.

6%, compared to +99. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SNX returned +521. 4% versus AVT's +135. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avnet, Inc.

(AVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 28β versus TD SYNNEX Corporation's 1. 43β — meaning SNX is approximately 12% more volatile than AVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 55% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is pulling ahead at 6.

9% versus -6. 6% for Avnet, Inc. (AVT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TD SYNNEX Corporation grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SNX leads at 0. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the more profitable company, earning 1.

3% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AVT leads at 2. 8% versus 2. 3% for SNX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AVT leads at 10. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) trades at 14.

3x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Avnet, Inc. — 1. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AVT: -3. 4% to $79. 33.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Avnet, Inc. (AVT) offers the highest yield at 1. 6%, versus 0. 7% for TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, TD SYNNEX Corporation (SNX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +521. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SNX: +521. 4%, AVT: +135. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.