Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SOBR
SOBR Safe, Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$110K
5Y Perf.-99.8%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$91M
5Y Perf.-50.0%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$243M
5Y Perf.-42.4%
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.-96.8%

SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SOBR logoSOBR
BLNK logoBLNK
TPVG logoTPVG
CHPT logoCHPT
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsEngineering & ConstructionAsset ManagementSpecialty Retail
Market Cap$110K$91M$243M$134M
Revenue (TTM)$364K$106M$97M$411M
Net Income (TTM)$-8M$-126M$-12M$-220M
Gross Margin27.9%26.0%83.5%30.5%
Operating Margin-23.3%-119.5%77.9%-51.1%
Forward P/E6.2x
Total Debt$343K$11M$469M$272M
Cash & Equiv.$8M$42M$20M$142M

SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPTLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SOBR
BLNK
TPVG
CHPT
StockMay 20May 26Return
SOBR Safe, Inc. (SOBR)1000.2-99.8%
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)10050.0-50.0%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10057.6-42.4%
ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT)1003.2-96.8%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 6 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
SOBR
SOBR Safe, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

SOBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 6.95x
  • Beta 1.73, current ratio 6.95x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Specific-Use Pick

BLNK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: industrials exposure
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
  • Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
  • 93.3% 10Y total return vs SOBR's -96.3%
  • 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
The Secondary Option

CHPT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthTPVG logoTPVG36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs SOBR's -22.6%
Stability / SafetyTPVG logoTPVGBeta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
DividendsTPVG logoTPVG17.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)TPVG logoTPVG+19.3% vs CHPT's -48.3%
Efficiency (ROA)TPVG logoTPVG-1.5% ROA vs SOBR's -114.7%, ROIC 7.2% vs -316.7%

SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

CHPTChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
56.3%$235M
License and Service
34.6%$144M
Product and Service, Other
9.1%$38M

SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTPVGLAGGINGBLNK

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

CHPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $411M annually — 1129.2x SOBR's $364,164. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOBR's -22.6%. On growth, SOBR holds the edge at +136.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSOBR logoSOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$364,164$106M$97M$411M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$8M-$115M-$22M-$180M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$8M-$126M-$12M-$220M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$7M-$47M$35M-$67M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+27.9%+26.0%+83.5%+30.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-23.3%-119.5%+77.9%-51.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-22.6%-118.7%+50.6%-53.5%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-19.2%-44.5%-58.7%-16.3%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+136.1%+11.7%+7.3%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+97.5%+99.9%-2.3%+28.8%
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

CHPT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricSOBR logoSOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…
Market CapShares × price$110,416$91M$243M$134M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$8M$60M$691M$263M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.01x-0.40x4.91x-0.65x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.6.23x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.84x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple9.13x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.52x0.73x2.50x0.32x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.01x0.67x0.68x6.77x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
CHPT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. SOBR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricSOBR logoSOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-138.2%-131.9%-3.4%-3.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-114.7%-66.7%-1.5%-25.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital-3.2%-109.7%+7.2%-83.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-105.7%-77.3%+9.4%-41.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94355
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.03x0.09x1.33x12.75x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8M-$31M$449M$130M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8M$42M$20M$142M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$342,696$11M$469M$272M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-400.50x-9064.60x-1.02x-8.58x
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for SOBR. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs CHPT's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.2% vs SOBR's -86.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSOBR logoSOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-14.3%+7.2%-6.3%-12.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-38.8%+4.8%+19.3%-48.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-88.9%-3.4%-96.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-99.8%-97.6%-13.5%-98.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.3%-97.5%+93.3%-96.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-86.6%-51.9%-1.2%-67.6%
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSOBR logoSOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.58x3.11x0.77x2.64x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.29$2.65$7.53$17.78
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.47$0.45$4.48$4.45
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+34.0%+29.9%+79.5%+34.6%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10059.066.458.355.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded7.9M2.1M504K474K
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", CHPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 21.8% for CHPT (target: $8). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricSOBR logoSOBRSOBR Safe, Inc.BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$8.95$7.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts1221
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+17.1%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises01
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.02
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHPT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallTriplePoint Venture Growth … (TPVG)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT a better buy right now?

For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?

Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -99. 8% for SOBR Safe, Inc. (SOBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 3. 11β — meaning BLNK is approximately 304% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SOBR Safe, Inc. (SOBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SOBR Safe, Inc. grew EPS 72. 2% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -40. 5% for SOBR Safe, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -36. 1% for SOBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49.

4% to $8. 95.

07

Which pays a better dividend — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?

In this comparison, TPVG (17.

1% yield) pays a dividend. SOBR, BLNK, CHPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

08

Is SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 17. 1% yield). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +91. 2%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between SOBR and BLNK and TPVG and CHPT?

These companies operate in different sectors (SOBR (Technology) and BLNK (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: SOBR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG pays a dividend while SOBR, BLNK, CHPT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SOBR

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 68%
  • Gross Margin > 16%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SOBR and BLNK and TPVG and CHPT on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SOBR: 136.1% · BLNK: 11.7%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.