Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Asset Management
Specialty Retail
SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Engineering & Construction | Asset Management | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $110K | $91M | $243M | $134M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $364K | $106M | $97M | $411M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-8M | $-126M | $-12M | $-220M |
| Gross Margin | 27.9% | 26.0% | 83.5% | 30.5% |
| Operating Margin | -23.3% | -119.5% | 77.9% | -51.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 6.2x | — |
| Total Debt | $343K | $11M | $469M | $272M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $42M | $20M | $142M |
SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SOBR Safe, Inc. (SOBR) | 100 | 0.2 | -99.8% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 50.0 | -50.0% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 57.6 | -42.4% |
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 3.2 | -96.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOBR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.73, Low D/E 3.5%, current ratio 6.95x
- Beta 1.73, current ratio 6.95x
BLNK plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.83, yield 17.1%
- Rev growth 36.6%, EPS growth 48.8%
- 93.3% 10Y total return vs SOBR's -96.3%
- 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
CHPT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.6% NII/revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2% | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs SOBR's -22.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | 17.1% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +19.3% vs CHPT's -48.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.5% ROA vs SOBR's -114.7%, ROIC 7.2% vs -316.7% |
SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories
CHPT leads 2 • SOBR leads 0 • BLNK leads 0
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TPVG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHPT is the larger business by revenue, generating $411M annually — 1129.2x SOBR's $364,164. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOBR's -22.6%. On growth, SOBR holds the edge at +136.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $364,164 | $106M | $97M | $411M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$8M | -$115M | -$22M | -$180M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$8M | -$126M | -$12M | -$220M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | -$47M | $35M | -$67M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.9% | +26.0% | +83.5% | +30.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -23.3% | -119.5% | +77.9% | -51.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -22.6% | -118.7% | +50.6% | -53.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -19.2% | -44.5% | -58.7% | -16.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +136.1% | +11.7% | — | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +97.5% | +99.9% | -2.3% | +28.8% |
Valuation Metrics
CHPT leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $110,416 | $91M | $243M | $134M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$8M | $60M | $691M | $263M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.40x | 4.91x | -0.65x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 6.23x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 4.84x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 9.13x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.52x | 0.73x | 2.50x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.01x | 0.67x | 0.68x | 6.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a -3.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. SOBR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TPVG scores 5/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -138.2% | -131.9% | -3.4% | -3.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -114.7% | -66.7% | -1.5% | -25.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.2% | -109.7% | +7.2% | -83.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -105.7% | -77.3% | +9.4% | -41.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.03x | 0.09x | 1.33x | 12.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$8M | -$31M | $449M | $130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $42M | $20M | $142M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $342,696 | $11M | $469M | $272M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -400.50x | -9064.60x | -1.02x | -8.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
TPVG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TPVG five years ago would be worth $8,649 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17 for SOBR. Over the past 12 months, TPVG leads with a +19.3% total return vs CHPT's -48.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.2% vs SOBR's -86.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.3% | +7.2% | -6.3% | -12.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.8% | +4.8% | +19.3% | -48.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -88.9% | -3.4% | -96.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.8% | -97.6% | -13.5% | -98.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | -97.5% | +93.3% | -96.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -86.6% | -51.9% | -1.2% | -67.6% |
Risk & Volatility
TPVG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
TPVG is the less volatile stock with a 0.83 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TPVG currently trades 79.5% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 29.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.58x | 3.11x | 0.77x | 2.64x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.29 | $2.65 | $7.53 | $17.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $0.45 | $4.48 | $4.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +34.0% | +29.9% | +79.5% | +34.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.0 | 66.4 | 58.3 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 7.9M | 2.1M | 504K | 474K |
Analyst Outlook
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: TPVG as "Hold", CHPT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 49.4% upside for TPVG (target: $9) vs 21.8% for CHPT (target: $8). TPVG is the only dividend payer here at 17.11% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $8.95 | $7.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 12 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +17.1% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.02 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
TPVG leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). CHPT leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
SOBR vs BLNK vs TPVG vs CHPT: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger pick with 36. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 9x trailing P/E (6. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) a "Hold" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?
Over the past 5 years, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) delivered a total return of -13. 5%, compared to -99. 8% for SOBR Safe, Inc. (SOBR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TPVG returned +91. 2% versus BLNK's -97. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 3. 11β — meaning BLNK is approximately 304% more volatile than TPVG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, SOBR Safe, Inc. (SOBR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is pulling ahead at 36. 6% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SOBR Safe, Inc. grew EPS 72. 2% year-over-year, compared to 26. 4% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BLNK leads at 82. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -40. 5% for SOBR Safe, Inc. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -36. 1% for SOBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TPVG leads at 83. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TPVG: 49.
4% to $8. 95.
07Which pays a better dividend — SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT?
In this comparison, TPVG (17.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SOBR, BLNK, CHPT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is SOBR or BLNK or TPVG or CHPT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), 17. 1% yield). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 3. 11 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TPVG: +91. 2%, BLNK: -97. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between SOBR and BLNK and TPVG and CHPT?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOBR (Technology) and BLNK (Industrials) and TPVG (Financial Services) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOBR is a small-cap high-growth stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. TPVG pays a dividend while SOBR, BLNK, CHPT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.