Software - Application
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Home Improvement
Internet Content & Information
Conglomerates
SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Application | Home Improvement | Internet Content & Information | Conglomerates |
| Market Cap | $78M | $40M | $2.16B | $905M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.03B | $442M | $10.29B | $1.85B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-70M | $22M | $800M | $-227M |
| Gross Margin | 27.4% | 33.0% | 37.7% | 38.7% |
| Operating Margin | -4.4% | 3.9% | 12.7% | 0.3% |
| Forward P/E | 0.6x | 2.7x | 1.1x | 150.4x |
| Total Debt | $20M | $216M | $129M | $1.88B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $442M | $9M | $5.44B | $68M |
SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) | 100 | 37.1 | -62.9% |
| Live Ventures Incor… (LIVE) | 100 | 124.8 | +24.8% |
| Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) | 100 | 32.7 | -67.3% |
| Compass Diversified (CODI) | 100 | 70.9 | -29.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOGP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and momentum is your priority.
- Lower P/E (0.6x vs 150.4x)
- +14.5% vs CODI's -30.3%
LIVE is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 5.7% ROA vs SOGP's -12.8%
MOMO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.78, yield 4.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.78, Low D/E 1.2%, current ratio 4.68x
- Beta 0.78, yield 4.6%, current ratio 4.68x
- 7.8% margin vs CODI's -12.3%
CODI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.8%, EPS growth -14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 2.2%
- 53.7% 10Y total return vs LIVE's 33.0%
- 4.8% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.8% revenue growth vs LIVE's -5.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (0.6x vs 150.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.8% margin vs CODI's -12.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs SOGP's 2.17, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, vs CODI's 4.2%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +14.5% vs CODI's -30.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.7% ROA vs SOGP's -12.8% |
SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories
LIVE leads 1 • SOGP leads 0 • CODI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MOMO is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.3B annually — 23.3x LIVE's $442M. MOMO is the more profitable business, keeping 7.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CODI's -12.3%. On growth, LIVE holds the edge at -2.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.0B | $442M | $10.3B | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $29M | $1.4B | $109M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $22M | $800M | -$227M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $22M | $685M | $10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +27.4% | +33.0% | +37.7% | +38.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | +3.9% | +12.7% | +0.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.4% | +5.0% | +7.8% | -12.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -1.9% | +5.0% | +6.7% | +0.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -2.7% | -5.1% | -5.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -112.5% | +32.1% | -5.1% |
Valuation Metrics
LIVE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 2.7x trailing earnings, LIVE trades at a 71% valuation discount to MOMO's 9.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MOMO's 6.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODI's 15.0x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $78M | $40M | $2.2B | $905M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $248M | $1.4B | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -7.40x | 2.67x | 9.34x | -3.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 0.56x | — | 1.08x | 150.38x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.27x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 7.77x | 6.91x | 14.99x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.26x | 0.09x | 1.46x | 0.48x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.48x | 0.60x | 0.66x | 1.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 1.93x | 21.90x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MOMO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LIVE delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-50 for CODI. MOMO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CODI's 3.27x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIVE scores 7/9 vs SOGP's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -27.6% | +23.3% | +7.2% | -49.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.8% | +5.7% | +5.3% | -7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +3.5% | +10.9% | +1.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -35.0% | +5.3% | +10.8% | +2.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.09x | 2.27x | 0.01x | 3.27x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$422M | $208M | -$5.3B | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $442M | $9M | $5.4B | $68M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $20M | $216M | $129M | $1.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -215.63x | 5.01x | 18.04x | -0.97x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SOGP and CODI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CODI five years ago would be worth $6,447 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,339 for SOGP. Over the past 12 months, SOGP leads with a +1448.7% total return vs CODI's -30.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOGP at 40.7% vs LIVE's -24.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.9% | -16.2% | +1.6% | +158.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +1448.7% | -9.2% | +16.2% | -30.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.4% | -56.1% | -5.7% | -25.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.6% | -64.9% | -36.7% | -35.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -84.2% | +33.0% | -9.4% | +53.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | -24.0% | -1.9% | -9.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MOMO and CODI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MOMO is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOGP's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CODI currently trades 68.9% from its 52-week high vs SOGP's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.23x | 0.78x | 1.09x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $37.00 | $25.88 | $9.22 | $17.46 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.18 | $7.01 | $5.68 | $4.58 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.2% | +50.9% | +68.8% | +68.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 48.5 | 42.2 | 61.2 | 70.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 59K | 5K | 648K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LIVE and MOMO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MOMO as "Buy", CODI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 27.8% upside for MOMO (target: $8) vs 24.7% for CODI (target: $15). For income investors, MOMO offers the higher dividend yield at 4.61% vs CODI's 4.16%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $8.10 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +4.6% | +4.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.99 | $0.50 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.9% | +1.3% | +5.1% | +0.0% |
MOMO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LIVE leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SOGP vs LIVE vs MOMO vs CODI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Compass Diversified (CODI) is the stronger pick with 4.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI?
On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.
7x versus Hello Group Inc. at 9. 3x. On forward P/E, Sound Group Inc. is actually cheaper at 0. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI?
Over the past 5 years, Compass Diversified (CODI) delivered a total return of -35.
5%, compared to -66. 6% for Sound Group Inc. (SOGP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODI returned +53. 7% versus SOGP's -84. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 78β versus Sound Group Inc. 's 2. 17β — meaning SOGP is approximately 177% more volatile than MOMO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Hello Group Inc. (MOMO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 3% for Compass Diversified — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Compass Diversified (CODI) is pulling ahead at 4.
8% versus -5. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1426. 1% for Compass Diversified. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI?
Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 8% net margin versus -12. 2% for Compass Diversified — meaning it keeps 7. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MOMO leads at 12. 7% versus -4. 4% for SOGP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CODI leads at 38. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sound Group Inc.
(SOGP) trades at 0. 6x forward P/E versus 150. 4x for Compass Diversified — 149. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MOMO: 27. 8% to $8. 10.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI?
In this comparison, MOMO (4.
6% yield), CODI (4. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SOGP, LIVE do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOGP or LIVE or MOMO or CODI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Hello Group Inc.
(MOMO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 78), 4. 6% yield). Sound Group Inc. (SOGP) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MOMO: -9. 4%, SOGP: -84. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOGP and LIVE and MOMO and CODI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SOGP (Technology) and LIVE (Consumer Cyclical) and MOMO (Communication Services) and CODI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SOGP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LIVE is a small-cap deep-value stock; MOMO is a small-cap deep-value stock; CODI is a small-cap income-oriented stock. MOMO, CODI pay a dividend while SOGP, LIVE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.