SOJC vs DUK

For growth investors, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is the stronger pick with 10.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 2% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) offers the better valuation at 5. 6x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) a "Hold" — based on 31 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is the cheapest at 5.

6x versus Duke Energy Corporation at 19. 8x. On forward P/E, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 is actually cheaper at 4. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Duke Energy Corporation wins at 0. 63x versus The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77's 0. 70x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) delivered a total return of +44.

0%, compared to +5. 4% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DUK returned +104. 1% versus SOJC's +30. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

24β versus The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77's 0. 80β — meaning SOJC is approximately -427% more volatile than DUK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 171% versus 194% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) is pulling ahead at 10.

6% versus 6. 2% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Duke Energy Corporation grew EPS 10. 5% year-over-year, compared to -1. 8% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77. Over a 3-year CAGR, DUK leads at 3. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

4% net margin versus 14. 7% for The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 — meaning it keeps 15. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DUK leads at 26. 6% versus 24. 7% for SOJC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DUK leads at 31. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 63x versus The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77's 0. 70x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) trades at 4. 8x forward P/E versus 18. 6x for Duke Energy Corporation — 13. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

The Southern Company JR 2017B NT 77 (SOJC) offers the highest yield at 12. 5%, versus 3. 4% for Duke Energy Corporation (DUK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

24), 3. 4% yield, +104. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DUK: +104. 1%, SOJC: +30. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SOJC is a mid-cap deep-value stock; DUK is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.