SOL
Emeren Group, Ltd.
Solar
Market Cap$100M
5Y Perf.-79.9%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
SOL vs SOC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
Oil & Gas Drilling
Market Cap$1.84T
5Y Perf.-54.9%
SOL vs SOC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | SOL | SOC |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Oil & Gas Drilling |
| Market Cap | $100M | $1.84T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-498M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | -8.7% |
| Operating Margin | -49.8% | -367.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | 7.5x |
| Total Debt | $63M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $98M |
SOL vs SOC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
SOL
SOC
| Stock | Apr 21 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emeren Group, Ltd. (SOL) | 100 | 20.1 | -79.9% |
| Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOL vs SOC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: SOL leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Sable Offshore Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SOL
Emeren Group, Ltd.
The Income Pick
SOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.33
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 18.8%, current ratio 3.87x
- Beta 0.33, current ratio 3.87x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
SOC
Sable Offshore Corp.
The Growth Play
SOC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- EPS growth 40.6%
- 32.4% 10Y total return vs SOL's -67.9%
- 9.5% revenue growth vs SOL's -12.8%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | SOC | 9.5% revenue growth vs SOL's -12.8% |
| Quality / Margins | SOL | -7.5% margin vs SOC's -391.5% |
| Stability / Safety | SOL | Beta 0.33 vs SOC's 1.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | SOL | +37.6% vs SOC's -36.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | SOL | -1.2% ROA vs SOC's -28.9%, ROIC -0.1% vs -44.6% |
SOL vs SOC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
SOL vs SOC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLSOLLAGGINGSOC
SOCSable Offshore Corp.
1leads
SOLEmeren Group, Ltd.
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs SOCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
SOL4/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
SOL2/2
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
SOL5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
SOC4/5
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
SOL2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOL is the larger business by revenue, generating $71M annually — 56.0x SOC's $1M. SOL is the more profitable business, keeping -7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SOC's -391.5%.
| Metric | SOLEmeren Group, Ltd. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$454M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$498M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | -$611M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | -8.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.8% | -367.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -391.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.4% | -480.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | -5.4% |
SOL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
SOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | SOLEmeren Group, Ltd. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $100M | $1.84T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $113M | $1.84T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.08x | -3.07x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.50x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | 2359.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
SOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SOL delivers a -1.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-114 for SOC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SOL scores 3/9 vs SOC's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | SOLEmeren Group, Ltd. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | -113.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | -28.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -44.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -37.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | -$98M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $98M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.38x | -2.28x |
SOL leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOC five years ago would be worth $13,264 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,340 for SOL. Over the past 12 months, SOL leads with a +37.6% total return vs SOC's -36.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOC at 8.2% vs SOL's -21.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | SOLEmeren Group, Ltd. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +9.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.6% | -36.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | +26.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | +32.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | +32.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | +8.2% |
SOC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SOC's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SOC's 36.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | SOLEmeren Group, Ltd. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.95 | $35.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.38 | $3.72 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +36.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 609K | 5.4M |
SOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | SOLEmeren Group, Ltd. | SOCSable Offshore Co… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $27.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
SOL leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SOC leads in 1 (Total Returns).
Best OverallEmeren Group, Ltd. (SOL)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
SOL vs SOC: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOL or SOC a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOL or SOC?
Over the past 5 years, Sable Offshore Corp.
(SOC) delivered a total return of +32. 6%, compared to -76. 6% for Emeren Group, Ltd. (SOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOC returned +32. 4% versus SOL's -67. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOL or SOC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Emeren Group, Ltd.
(SOL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus Sable Offshore Corp. 's 1. 51β — meaning SOC is approximately 365% more volatile than SOL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SOL or SOC?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sable Offshore Corp.
grew EPS 40. 6% year-over-year, compared to -328. 6% for Emeren Group, Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOL or SOC?
Emeren Group, Ltd.
(SOL) is the more profitable company, earning -13. 6% net margin versus -391. 5% for Sable Offshore Corp. — meaning it keeps -13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOL leads at -0. 5% versus -367. 6% for SOC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SOL leads at 26. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SOL or SOC?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SOL or SOC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Emeren Group, Ltd.
(SOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33)). Sable Offshore Corp. (SOC) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOL: -67. 9%, SOC: +32. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SOL and SOC?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.