Solar
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SOL vs SPWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Solar
SOL vs SPWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Solar | Solar |
| Market Cap | $100M | $866M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $71M | $315M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-5M | $-42M |
| Gross Margin | 33.9% | 50.4% |
| Operating Margin | -49.8% | -2.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 5.1x |
| Total Debt | $63M | $188M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $50M | $10M |
SOL vs SPWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 23 | Dec 25 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Emeren Group, Ltd. (SOL) | 100 | 50.4 | -49.6% |
| SunPower Inc. (SPWR) | 100 | 50.9 | -49.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOL vs SPWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.33
- -67.9% 10Y total return vs SPWR's -81.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.33, Low D/E 18.8%, current ratio 3.87x
SPWR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 2.9%, EPS growth 0.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 65.3%
- 2.9% revenue growth vs SOL's -12.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.9% revenue growth vs SOL's -12.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -7.5% margin vs SPWR's -13.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.33 vs SPWR's 2.13 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +37.6% vs SPWR's -42.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.2% ROA vs SPWR's -19.5%, ROIC -0.1% vs -5.3% |
SOL vs SPWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SOL vs SPWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SOL leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $315M annually — 4.4x SOL's $71M. SOL is the more profitable business, keeping -7.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWR's -13.2%. On growth, SOL holds the edge at +21.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $71M | $315M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$27M | -$6M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$5M | -$42M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $34M | -$15M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.9% | +50.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -49.8% | -2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -7.5% | -13.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +47.4% | -4.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +21.6% | -0.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -27.7% | -101.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — SOL and SPWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $100M | $866M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $113M | $1.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -8.08x | -15.25x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 5.10x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.62x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 2.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.30x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SOL leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPWR scores 5/9 vs SOL's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -1.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.2% | -19.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.1% | -5.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.1% | -7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.19x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $13M | $179M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $50M | $10M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $63M | $188M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -9.38x | -1.57x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SOL leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SOL five years ago would be worth $2,340 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,872 for SPWR. Over the past 12 months, SOL leads with a +37.6% total return vs SPWR's -42.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SOL at -21.2% vs SPWR's -42.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | -38.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +37.6% | -42.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.0% | -81.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -76.6% | -81.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -67.9% | -81.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.2% | -42.8% |
Risk & Volatility
SOL leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOL is the less volatile stock with a 0.33 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWR's 2.13 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SOL currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs SPWR's 44.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.33x | 2.13x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.95 | $2.27 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.38 | $0.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.5% | +44.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 68.8 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 609K | 1.7M |
Analyst Outlook
SOL leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.81 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +7.2% | 0.0% |
SOL leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 1 category is tied.
SOL vs SPWR: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOL or SPWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the stronger pick with 2. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -12. 8% for Emeren Group, Ltd. (SOL). Analysts rate SunPower Inc. (SPWR) a "Hold" — based on 45 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SOL or SPWR?
Over the past 5 years, Emeren Group, Ltd.
(SOL) delivered a total return of -76. 6%, compared to -81. 3% for SunPower Inc. (SPWR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SOL returned -67. 9% versus SPWR's -81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SOL or SPWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Emeren Group, Ltd.
(SOL) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 33β versus SunPower Inc. 's 2. 13β — meaning SPWR is approximately 555% more volatile than SOL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — SOL or SPWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is pulling ahead at 2. 9% versus -12. 8% for Emeren Group, Ltd. (SOL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SunPower Inc. grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -328. 6% for Emeren Group, Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPWR leads at 65. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SOL or SPWR?
SunPower Inc.
(SPWR) is the more profitable company, earning -10. 5% net margin versus -13. 6% for Emeren Group, Ltd. — meaning it keeps -10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SOL leads at -0. 5% versus -2. 0% for SPWR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPWR leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SOL or SPWR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is SOL or SPWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Emeren Group, Ltd.
(SOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 33)). SunPower Inc. (SPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 13 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOL: -67. 9%, SPWR: -81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SOL and SPWR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.