Apparel - Footwear & Accessories
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Computer Hardware
Information Technology Services
Entertainment
Entertainment
SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Apparel - Footwear & Accessories | Computer Hardware | Information Technology Services | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $56M | $331M | $25M | $481M | $1.18B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $18M | $530M | $299M | $6.11B | $27.11B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-42K | $-210M | $-4M | $-153M | $-390M |
| Gross Margin | 8.0% | 7.8% | 22.8% | 12.7% | 21.9% |
| Operating Margin | 1.3% | -21.0% | -1.4% | -3.4% | 1.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 4.0x | 4.8x |
| Total Debt | $5M | $55M | $34M | $49M | $14.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $81M | $28M | $1.19B | $3.53B |
SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| AsiaStrategy (SORA) | 100 | 29.3 | -70.7% |
| Canaan Inc. (CAN) | 100 | 84.8 | -15.2% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 95.4 | -4.6% |
| HUYA Inc. (HUYA) | 100 | 84.4 | -15.6% |
| iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) | 100 | 75.6 | -24.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SORA has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- -54.5% 10Y total return vs HUYA's -60.1%
- -0.2% margin vs CAN's -39.7%
- -0.7% ROA vs CAN's -34.9%, ROIC 4.3% vs -24.9%
CAN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 96.7%, EPS growth 51.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -6.7%
- 96.7% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1%
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- Beta 0.27 vs CAN's 4.41
- 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
HUYA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.17, Low D/E 0.6%, current ratio 3.14x
- Beta 1.17, yield 56.7%, current ratio 3.14x
- Lower P/E (4.0x vs 4.8x)
- +26.9% vs SORA's -54.5%
Among these 5 stocks, IQ doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 96.7% revenue growth vs HUYA's -13.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.0x vs 4.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | -0.2% margin vs CAN's -39.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.27 vs CAN's 4.41 | |
| Dividends | 14.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs HUYA's 56.7%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +26.9% vs SORA's -54.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -0.7% ROA vs CAN's -34.9%, ROIC 4.3% vs -24.9% |
SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
HUYA leads in 2 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 1 • SORA leads 0 • CAN leads 0 • IQ leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — CLPS and IQ each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IQ is the larger business by revenue, generating $27.1B annually — 1538.7x SORA's $18M. SORA is the more profitable business, keeping -0.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CAN's -39.7%. On growth, CAN holds the edge at +121.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $18M | $530M | $299M | $6.1B | $27.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$66M | -$1M | -$120M | $6.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$210M | -$4M | -$153M | -$390M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $0 | $0 | $0 | $466M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +8.0% | +7.8% | +22.8% | +12.7% | +21.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.3% | -21.0% | -1.4% | -3.4% | +1.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -0.2% | -39.7% | -1.3% | -2.5% | -1.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.6% | — | -2.3% | -1.9% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +32.8% | +121.1% | +15.3% | +1.7% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +59.4% | +75.8% | -118.5% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
CLPS leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IQ's 10.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SORA's 256.5x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $331M | $25M | $481M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $59M | $305M | $31M | $314M | $2.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1365.00x | -1.14x | -3.48x | -103.70x | 10.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 3.97x | 4.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 256.49x | — | — | — | 10.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.20x | 0.62x | 0.15x | 0.54x | 0.27x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 41.04x | 0.55x | 0.43x | 0.67x | 0.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | 4.13x |
Profitability & Efficiency
HUYA leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
HUYA delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-48 for CAN. HUYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SORA's 3.77x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), HUYA scores 7/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.8% | -48.1% | -6.1% | -2.4% | -2.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.7% | -34.9% | -3.2% | -1.7% | -0.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.3% | -24.9% | -7.9% | -1.7% | +5.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.2% | -29.7% | -9.8% | -2.1% | +7.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.77x | 0.13x | 0.59x | 0.01x | 1.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3M | -$26M | $6M | -$1.1B | $10.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $81M | $28M | $1.2B | $3.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $55M | $34M | $49M | $14.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.81x | -104.52x | — | — | 0.77x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
HUYA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SORA five years ago would be worth $4,550 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $770 for CAN. Over the past 12 months, HUYA leads with a +26.9% total return vs SORA's -54.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors HUYA at 25.9% vs IQ's -41.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -13.9% | -33.1% | -10.3% | +5.6% | -40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -54.5% | -14.1% | -5.4% | +26.9% | -36.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | -79.3% | +0.5% | +99.7% | -79.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | -92.3% | -69.3% | -60.8% | -91.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.5% | -90.1% | -78.5% | -60.1% | -92.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.1% | -40.9% | +0.2% | +25.9% | -41.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — CLPS and HUYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLPS is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CAN's 4.41 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. HUYA currently trades 64.9% from its 52-week high vs SORA's 19.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.09x | 4.41x | 0.27x | 1.17x | 1.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.15 | $2.22 | $1.88 | $4.93 | $2.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.57 | $0.39 | $0.80 | $2.21 | $1.07 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +19.3% | +23.2% | +48.2% | +64.9% | +42.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.1 | 58.4 | 49.8 | 54.2 | 45.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 11K | 9.7M | 15K | 1.0M | 11.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — CLPS and HUYA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: CAN as "Buy", HUYA as "Buy", IQ as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 336.9% upside for CAN (target: $2) vs 7.8% for HUYA (target: $3). For income investors, HUYA offers the higher dividend yield at 56.67% vs CLPS's 14.60%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | — | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $2.25 | — | $3.45 | $2.16 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 6 | — | 15 | 22 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | +56.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | $12.34 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.6% | 0.0% |
HUYA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CLPS leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
SORA vs CAN vs CLPS vs HUYA vs IQ: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Canaan Inc.
(CAN) is the stronger pick with 96. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). iQIYI, Inc. (IQ) offers the better valuation at 10. 7x trailing P/E (4. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Canaan Inc. (CAN) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ?
On forward P/E, HUYA Inc.
is actually cheaper at 4. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ?
Over the past 5 years, AsiaStrategy (SORA) delivered a total return of -54.
5%, compared to -92. 3% for Canaan Inc. (CAN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SORA returned -54. 5% versus IQ's -92. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
27β versus Canaan Inc. 's 4. 41β — meaning CAN is approximately 1524% more volatile than CLPS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, HUYA Inc. (HUYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 4% for AsiaStrategy — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Canaan Inc.
(CAN) is pulling ahead at 96. 7% versus -13. 1% for HUYA Inc. (HUYA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: HUYA Inc. grew EPS 75. 0% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLPS leads at 2. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ?
iQIYI, Inc.
(IQ) is the more profitable company, earning 2. 6% net margin versus -39. 7% for Canaan Inc. — meaning it keeps 2. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IQ leads at 6. 2% versus -21. 2% for CAN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IQ leads at 24. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, HUYA Inc.
(HUYA) trades at 4. 0x forward P/E versus 4. 8x for iQIYI, Inc. — 0. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CAN: 336. 9% to $2. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ?
In this comparison, HUYA (56.
7% yield), CLPS (14. 6% yield) pay a dividend. SORA, CAN, IQ do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SORA or CAN or CLPS or HUYA or IQ better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
27), 14. 6% yield). Canaan Inc. (CAN) carries a higher beta of 4. 41 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CLPS: -78. 5%, CAN: -90. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SORA and CAN and CLPS and HUYA and IQ?
These companies operate in different sectors (SORA (Consumer Cyclical) and CAN (Technology) and CLPS (Technology) and HUYA (Communication Services) and IQ (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SORA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CAN is a small-cap high-growth stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUYA is a small-cap income-oriented stock; IQ is a small-cap deep-value stock. CLPS, HUYA pay a dividend while SORA, CAN, IQ do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.