Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Semiconductors
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Semiconductors | Hardware, Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $76M | $3.92B | $3.63B | $13.63B | $20.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $20M | $901M | $2.07B | $1.03B | $4.07B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $94M | $-194M | $106M | $327M |
| Gross Margin | 49.9% | 44.4% | 15.6% | 48.8% | 45.2% |
| Operating Margin | 7.4% | 12.1% | -5.3% | 10.0% | 14.8% |
| Forward P/E | 60.1x | 30.8x | 37.5x | 39.9x | 27.3x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $303M | $810M | $17M | $4.69B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $766M | $312M | $346M | $675M |
SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) | 100 | 197.5 | +97.5% |
| ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) | 100 | 300.3 | +200.3% |
| Ultra Clean Holding… (UCTT) | 100 | 420.2 | +320.2% |
| Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) | 100 | 915.9 | +815.9% |
| MKS Inc. (MKSI) | 100 | 296.5 | +196.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SOTK has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in stability and efficiency.
- Beta 0.43 vs ACMR's 3.24
- 6.6% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.6%
ACMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.2%, EPS growth -10.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.3%
- 30.7% 10Y total return vs ONTO's 14.3%
- PEG 0.87 vs SOTK's 26.10
- 15.2% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1%
UCTT is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +312.7% vs SOTK's +21.5%
ONTO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 2.66, Low D/E 0.8%, current ratio 5.79x
MKSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.64, yield 0.3%
- Beta 2.64, yield 0.3%, current ratio 2.71x
- Lower P/E (27.3x vs 39.9x)
- 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.2% revenue growth vs UCTT's -2.1% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (27.3x vs 39.9x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.4% margin vs UCTT's -9.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs ACMR's 3.24 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield, vs ACMR's 0.2%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +312.7% vs SOTK's +21.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.6% ROA vs UCTT's -11.0%, ROIC 5.7% vs 2.6% |
SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MKSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACMR leads 1 • SOTK leads 0 • UCTT leads 0 • ONTO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MKSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.1B annually — 199.4x SOTK's $20M. ACMR is the more profitable business, keeping 10.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UCTT's -9.4%. On growth, MKSI holds the edge at +15.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $20M | $901M | $2.1B | $1.0B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2M | $126M | -$52M | $158M | $945M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $94M | -$194M | $106M | $327M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$811,225 | -$69M | -$44M | $239M | $401M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +49.9% | +44.4% | +15.6% | +48.8% | +45.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.4% | +12.1% | -5.3% | +10.0% | +14.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +7.7% | +10.4% | -9.4% | +10.3% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -7.6% | -2.1% | +23.2% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.6% | +9.4% | +2.9% | +9.5% | +15.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | -76.1% | -2.6% | -48.5% | +53.2% |
Valuation Metrics
MKSI leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 43.2x trailing earnings, ACMR trades at a 56% valuation discount to ONTO's 98.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ACMR offers better value at 1.22x vs SOTK's 26.10x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $76M | $3.9B | $3.6B | $13.6B | $20.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $71M | $3.5B | $4.1B | $13.3B | $24.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 60.15x | 43.21x | -19.98x | 98.57x | 68.83x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.81x | 37.54x | 39.93x | 27.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 26.10x | 1.22x | — | 2.85x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 41.59x | 27.49x | 34.53x | 68.79x | 26.70x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.72x | 4.35x | 1.77x | 13.56x | 5.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.31x | 2.06x | 4.62x | 6.43x | 7.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1358.08x | — | 247.26x | 45.47x | 40.74x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MKSI delivers a 12.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-25 for UCTT. ONTO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MKSI's 1.73x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MKSI scores 6/9 vs ACMR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +6.1% | -25.4% | +5.2% | +12.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.6% | +3.9% | -11.0% | +4.7% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +7.0% | +2.6% | +5.7% | +6.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | +6.6% | +2.9% | +6.5% | +7.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.16x | 1.03x | 0.01x | 1.73x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$463M | $499M | -$329M | $4.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $766M | $312M | $346M | $675M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $303M | $810M | $17M | $4.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 20.44x | -5.80x | — | 2.84x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ACMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ONTO five years ago would be worth $41,263 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,883 for SOTK. Over the past 12 months, UCTT leads with a +312.7% total return vs SOTK's +21.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ACMR at 80.5% vs SOTK's -1.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.2% | +31.9% | +192.5% | +65.2% | +78.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +21.5% | +195.6% | +312.7% | +118.9% | +306.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -3.6% | +487.9% | +187.5% | +218.0% | +266.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +18.8% | +133.4% | +59.4% | +312.6% | +66.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +386.0% | +3065.8% | +1385.1% | +1431.7% | +750.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.2% | +80.5% | +42.2% | +47.1% | +54.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SOTK and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SOTK is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ACMR's 3.24 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MKSI currently trades 92.0% from its 52-week high vs ACMR's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.48x | 3.17x | 3.21x | 2.60x | 2.56x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.69 | $71.65 | $87.68 | $315.86 | $326.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.23 | $19.26 | $18.52 | $85.88 | $71.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +85.4% | +82.6% | +91.1% | +86.8% | +92.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.1 | 60.7 | 62.3 | 61.0 | 65.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 31K | 1.2M | 1.3M | 832K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ACMR and MKSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ACMR as "Buy", UCTT as "Buy", ONTO as "Buy", MKSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 26.7% upside for ACMR (target: $75) vs -2.2% for MKSI (target: $294). For income investors, MKSI offers the higher dividend yield at 0.29% vs ACMR's 0.19%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $75.00 | $100.00 | $331.67 | $294.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 12 | 11 | 29 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.2% | — | — | +0.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.11 | — | — | $0.87 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +0.6% | +0.2% |
MKSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). ACMR leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
SOTK vs ACMR vs UCTT vs ONTO vs MKSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the stronger pick with 15. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) offers the better valuation at 43. 2x trailing P/E (30. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI?
On trailing P/E, ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is the cheapest at 43. 2x versus Onto Innovation Inc. at 98. 6x. On forward P/E, MKS Inc. is actually cheaper at 27. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: ACM Research, Inc. wins at 0. 87x versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 1. 16x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI?
Over the past 5 years, Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) delivered a total return of +312. 6%, compared to +18. 8% for Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ACMR returned +31. 0% versus SOTK's +382. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
48β versus Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning UCTT is approximately 564% more volatile than SOTK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Onto Innovation Inc. (ONTO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 173% for MKS Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACM Research, Inc.
(ACMR) is pulling ahead at 15. 2% versus -2. 1% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. (UCTT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MKS Inc. grew EPS 55. 5% year-over-year, compared to -869. 2% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, ACMR leads at 32. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI?
Onto Innovation Inc.
(ONTO) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 6% net margin versus -8. 8% for Ultra Clean Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MKSI leads at 14. 4% versus 2. 1% for UCTT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ONTO leads at 49. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 87x versus Onto Innovation Inc. 's 1. 16x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, MKS Inc. (MKSI) trades at 27. 3x forward P/E versus 39. 9x for Onto Innovation Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACMR: 26. 7% to $75. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI?
In this comparison, MKSI (0.
3% yield), ACMR (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. SOTK, UCTT, ONTO do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SOTK or ACMR or UCTT or ONTO or MKSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sono-Tek Corporation (SOTK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
48), +382. 0% 10Y return). ACM Research, Inc. (ACMR) carries a higher beta of 3. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SOTK: +382. 0%, ACMR: +31. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SOTK and ACMR and UCTT and ONTO and MKSI?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SOTK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACMR is a small-cap high-growth stock; UCTT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ONTO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MKSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.