Security & Protection Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
Technology Distributors
SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Security & Protection Services | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors | Technology Distributors |
| Market Cap | $37M | $952M | $6.62B | $9.70B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $28M | $3.09B | $24.96B | $33.51B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $73M | $214M | $727M |
| Gross Margin | 53.2% | 13.5% | 10.5% | 11.2% |
| Operating Margin | 5.7% | 3.1% | 2.7% | 3.2% |
| Forward P/E | 14.1x | 11.0x | 16.2x | 13.4x |
| Total Debt | $21M | $147M | $2.88B | $3.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $10M | $126M | $192M | $306M |
SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB) | 100 | 5.1 | -94.9% |
| ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) | 100 | 176.1 | +76.1% |
| Avnet, Inc. (AVT) | 100 | 296.8 | +196.8% |
| Arrow Electronics, … (ARW) | 100 | 274.8 | +174.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPCB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 0.9%, EPS growth 100.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.5%
- 13.4% margin vs AVT's 0.9%
- +68.5% vs SCSC's +20.2%
- 6.7% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 0.8% vs 6.0%
SCSC is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.4x)
AVT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.27, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.27, Low D/E 57.4%, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 1.27, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.43x
- Beta 1.27 vs SCSC's 1.48
ARW is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 218.0% 10Y total return vs AVT's 132.4%
- 10.5% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.5% revenue growth vs SCSC's -6.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.0x vs 13.4x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.4% margin vs AVT's 0.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.27 vs SCSC's 1.48 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +68.5% vs SCSC's +20.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.7% ROA vs AVT's 1.7%, ROIC 0.8% vs 6.0% |
SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
SPCB leads in 2 of 6 categories
AVT leads 2 • SCSC leads 1 • ARW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SPCB leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
ARW is the larger business by revenue, generating $33.5B annually — 1209.1x SPCB's $28M. SPCB is the more profitable business, keeping 13.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AVT's 0.9%. On growth, ARW holds the edge at +39.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $28M | $3.1B | $25.0B | $33.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | $114M | $781M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $73M | $214M | $727M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$1M | $124M | $33M | $410M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +53.2% | +13.5% | +10.5% | +11.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.7% | +3.1% | +2.7% | +3.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +13.4% | +2.4% | +0.9% | +2.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +4.0% | +0.1% | +1.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -5.4% | +8.8% | +33.9% | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -73.3% | +5.4% | +12.9% | +2.0% |
Valuation Metrics
SCSC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, SPCB trades at a 52% valuation discount to AVT's 29.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SCSC's 8.4x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AVT's 12.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $37M | $952M | $6.6B | $9.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $48M | $973M | $9.3B | $12.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.14x | 14.47x | 29.40x | 17.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.98x | 16.22x | 13.42x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | 2.16x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.12x | 8.43x | 12.44x | 11.59x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.34x | 0.31x | 0.30x | 0.31x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.23x | 1.14x | 1.41x | 1.49x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.15x | 11.47x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPCB leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SPCB delivers a 15.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $4 for AVT. SCSC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to AVT's 0.57x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SCSC scores 7/9 vs ARW's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +15.4% | +8.1% | +4.3% | +11.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.7% | +4.2% | +1.7% | +2.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.8% | +7.0% | +6.0% | +7.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +0.9% | +7.7% | +7.9% | +9.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.47x | 0.16x | 0.57x | 0.46x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11M | $21M | $2.7B | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $10M | $126M | $192M | $306M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $21M | $147M | $2.9B | $3.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.39x | 11.00x | 2.80x | 7.11x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AVT leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AVT five years ago would be worth $19,408 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $389 for SPCB. Over the past 12 months, SPCB leads with a +68.5% total return vs SCSC's +20.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AVT at 27.0% vs SPCB's -21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.3% | +11.1% | +64.6% | +67.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +68.5% | +20.2% | +65.6% | +64.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -52.0% | +64.5% | +105.0% | +61.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.1% | +34.3% | +94.1% | +61.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +9.7% | +132.4% | +218.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -21.7% | +18.0% | +27.0% | +17.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — AVT and ARW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AVT is the less volatile stock with a 1.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SCSC's 1.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ARW currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs SPCB's 79.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.38x | 1.48x | 1.27x | 1.32x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.57 | $46.25 | $84.72 | $196.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $6.15 | $33.76 | $44.25 | $101.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.2% | +93.8% | +95.4% | +96.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 69.0 | 60.3 | 76.9 | 75.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 204K | 1.0M | 560K |
Analyst Outlook
AVT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SCSC as "Hold", AVT as "Hold", ARW as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply -0.9% upside for SCSC (target: $43) vs -32.1% for ARW (target: $129). AVT is the only dividend payer here at 1.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $43.00 | $79.33 | $128.80 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 5 | 20 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 12 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $1.30 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +11.2% | +4.6% | +1.7% |
SPCB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). AVT leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
SPCB vs SCSC vs AVT vs ARW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(ARW) is the stronger pick with 10. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) a "Hold" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW?
On trailing P/E, SuperCom Ltd.
(SPCB) is the cheapest at 14. 1x versus Avnet, Inc. at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, ScanSource, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW?
Over the past 5 years, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) delivered a total return of +94. 1%, compared to -96. 1% for SuperCom Ltd. (SPCB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ARW returned +218. 0% versus SPCB's -98. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 27β versus ScanSource, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning SCSC is approximately 16% more volatile than AVT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 57% for Avnet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Arrow Electronics, Inc.
(ARW) is pulling ahead at 10. 5% versus -6. 7% for ScanSource, Inc. (SCSC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: SuperCom Ltd. grew EPS 100. 0% year-over-year, compared to -49. 4% for Avnet, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SPCB leads at 16. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW?
SuperCom Ltd.
(SPCB) is the more profitable company, earning 13. 4% net margin versus 1. 1% for Avnet, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ARW leads at 3. 0% versus 1. 8% for SPCB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPCB leads at 55. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, ScanSource, Inc.
(SCSC) trades at 11. 0x forward P/E versus 16. 2x for Avnet, Inc. — 5. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SCSC: -0. 9% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW?
In this comparison, AVT (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. SPCB, SCSC, ARW do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPCB or SCSC or AVT or ARW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Avnet, Inc.
(AVT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 27), 1. 6% yield, +132. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AVT: +132. 4%, SCSC: +9. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPCB and SCSC and AVT and ARW?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPCB (Industrials) and SCSC (Technology) and AVT (Technology) and ARW (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPCB is a small-cap deep-value stock; SCSC is a small-cap deep-value stock; AVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ARW is a small-cap deep-value stock. AVT pays a dividend while SPCB, SCSC, ARW do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.