Medical - Healthcare Information Services
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Healthcare Information Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $225M | $898M | $8.71B | $708M | $72.09B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $103M | $266M | $12.12B | $690M | $11.87B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $-36M | $-1.74B | $-40M | $2.09B |
| Gross Margin | 91.4% | 37.9% | 35.2% | 37.5% | 49.9% |
| Operating Margin | 13.2% | -10.3% | -2.6% | -4.4% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | — | — | 129.4x | 25.8x |
| Total Debt | $7M | $642M | $17.71B | $51M | $9.77B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $25M | $27M | $1.00B | $210M | $1.17B |
SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) | 100 | 105.5 | +5.5% |
| Shenandoah Telecomm… (SHEN) | 100 | 30.8 | -69.2% |
| Lumen Technologies,… (LUMN) | 100 | 86.1 | -13.9% |
| NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
| Motorola Solutions,… (MSI) | 100 | 320.5 | +220.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
SPOK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.7%, current ratio 1.18x
- Beta 0.42, yield 11.9%, current ratio 1.18x
- Lower P/E (16.4x vs 25.8x)
- 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSI's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SHEN ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 9.1%, EPS growth -120.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.9%
- 9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4%
LUMN is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +100.0% vs SPOK's -26.7%
Among these 5 stocks, NTGR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
MSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 0.21, yield 1.0%
- 5.5% 10Y total return vs SHEN's 21.6%
- 17.6% margin vs LUMN's -14.3%
- Beta 0.21 vs LUMN's 2.74
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.1% revenue growth vs LUMN's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.4x vs 25.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.6% margin vs LUMN's -14.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.21 vs LUMN's 2.74 | |
| Dividends | 11.9% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs MSI's 1.0%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +100.0% vs SPOK's -26.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.4% ROA vs LUMN's -5.3%, ROIC 25.6% vs -0.8% |
SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MSI leads in 2 of 6 categories
SPOK leads 1 • LUMN leads 1 • SHEN leads 0 • NTGR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LUMN is the larger business by revenue, generating $12.1B annually — 117.2x SPOK's $103M. MSI is the more profitable business, keeping 17.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUMN's -14.3%. On growth, MSI holds the edge at +7.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $103M | $266M | $12.1B | $690M | $11.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $17M | $104M | $2.4B | -$19M | $3.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | -$36M | -$1.7B | -$40M | $2.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $26M | -$276M | $5.4B | -$11M | $2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +91.4% | +37.9% | +35.2% | +37.5% | +49.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.2% | -10.3% | -2.6% | -4.4% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.3% | -13.7% | -14.3% | -5.8% | +17.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | -103.5% | +44.9% | -1.6% | +21.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -100.0% | -8.9% | -2.0% | +7.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -64.0% | -18.2% | 0.0% | -123.8% | -13.8% |
Valuation Metrics
SPOK leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.4x trailing earnings, SPOK trades at a 58% valuation discount to MSI's 34.0x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SPOK's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MSI's 23.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $898M | $8.7B | $708M | $72.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $206M | $1.5B | $25.4B | $549M | $80.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 14.44x | -22.86x | -4.83x | -22.71x | 33.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.41x | — | — | 129.45x | 25.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 1.83x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 8.91x | 13.80x | 9.91x | — | 23.83x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.61x | 2.51x | 0.70x | 1.02x | 6.17x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.56x | 0.92x | — | 1.50x | 30.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 8.91x | — | 23.49x | — | 28.03x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MSI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MSI delivers a 89.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $90 in annual profit, vs $-79 for LUMN. SPOK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MSI's 4.02x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPOK scores 6/9 vs SHEN's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.3% | -3.7% | -79.4% | -8.0% | +89.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | -2.0% | -5.3% | -4.9% | +11.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.3% | -1.1% | -0.8% | -8.4% | +25.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.1% | -1.3% | -0.6% | -6.0% | +25.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.66x | — | 0.10x | 4.02x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$18M | $614M | $16.7B | -$159M | $8.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $25M | $27M | $1.0B | $210M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $7M | $642M | $17.7B | $51M | $9.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -0.65x | -1.12x | — | 12.80x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LUMN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MSI five years ago would be worth $22,733 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,704 for NTGR. Over the past 12 months, LUMN leads with a +100.0% total return vs SPOK's -26.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LUMN at 54.4% vs SHEN's -4.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -14.3% | +43.5% | +10.0% | +6.5% | +14.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -26.7% | +41.3% | +100.0% | -9.7% | +5.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.4% | -13.6% | +267.8% | +86.5% | +56.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +61.9% | -27.9% | -28.8% | -33.0% | +127.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +13.3% | +21.6% | -35.7% | -37.7% | +554.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.3% | -4.8% | +54.4% | +23.1% | +16.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — SHEN and MSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MSI is the less volatile stock with a 0.21 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUMN's 2.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SHEN currently trades 93.6% from its 52-week high vs SPOK's 56.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.42x | 0.89x | 2.74x | 1.39x | 0.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.31 | $17.34 | $11.95 | $36.86 | $492.22 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.96 | $9.66 | $3.37 | $19.00 | $361.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.1% | +93.6% | +70.8% | +70.2% | +88.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.7 | 55.2 | 73.4 | 56.1 | 43.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 185K | 300K | 12.5M | 515K | 880K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SPOK and MSI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPOK as "Hold", SHEN as "Buy", LUMN as "Hold", NTGR as "Hold", MSI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 78.7% upside for SHEN (target: $29) vs -16.3% for LUMN (target: $7). For income investors, SPOK offers the higher dividend yield at 11.95% vs SHEN's 0.72%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $29.00 | $7.08 | $36.00 | $481.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 8 | 28 | 17 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +11.9% | +0.7% | +0.0% | — | +1.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 5 | 3 | 0 | — | 14 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.29 | $0.12 | $0.00 | — | $4.33 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.3% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +7.2% | +1.6% |
MSI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SPOK leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
SPOK vs SHEN vs LUMN vs NTGR vs MSI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is the stronger pick with 9.
1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) offers the better valuation at 14. 4x trailing P/E (16. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) a "Buy" — based on 8 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI?
On trailing P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) is the cheapest at 14. 4x versus Motorola Solutions, Inc. at 34. 0x. On forward P/E, Spok Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI?
Over the past 5 years, Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) delivered a total return of +127. 3%, compared to -33. 0% for NETGEAR, Inc. (NTGR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MSI returned +554. 6% versus NTGR's -37. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 21β versus Lumen Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 74β — meaning LUMN is approximately 1237% more volatile than MSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Spok Holdings, Inc. (SPOK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 4% for Motorola Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Shenandoah Telecommunications Company (SHEN) is pulling ahead at 9.
1% versus -5. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Motorola Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Lumen Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, SHEN leads at 12. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI?
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the more profitable company, earning 18. 4% net margin versus -14. 0% for Lumen Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MSI leads at 25. 1% versus -6. 2% for SHEN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SPOK leads at 78. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Spok Holdings, Inc.
(SPOK) trades at 16. 4x forward P/E versus 129. 4x for NETGEAR, Inc. — 113. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SHEN: 78. 7% to $29. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI?
In this comparison, SPOK (11.
9% yield), MSI (1. 0% yield), SHEN (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. LUMN, NTGR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is SPOK or SHEN or LUMN or NTGR or MSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Motorola Solutions, Inc.
(MSI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 21), 1. 0% yield, +554. 6% 10Y return). Lumen Technologies, Inc. (LUMN) carries a higher beta of 2. 74 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSI: +554. 6%, LUMN: -35. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between SPOK and SHEN and LUMN and NTGR and MSI?
These companies operate in different sectors (SPOK (Healthcare) and SHEN (Communication Services) and LUMN (Communication Services) and NTGR (Technology) and MSI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: SPOK is a small-cap deep-value stock; SHEN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LUMN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NTGR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MSI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. SPOK, SHEN, MSI pay a dividend while LUMN, NTGR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 22%
- Dividend Yield > 0.5%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.