Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
SPR
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$4.64B
5Y Perf.+82.3%
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$26.70B
5Y Perf.+462.6%
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$70.14B
5Y Perf.+220.2%
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$10.68B
5Y Perf.+310.2%

SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
SPR logoSPR
CW logoCW
TDG logoTDG
KTOS logoKTOS
IndustryAerospace & DefenseAerospace & DefenseAerospace & DefenseAerospace & Defense
Market Cap$4.64B$26.70B$70.14B$10.68B
Revenue (TTM)$6.39B$3.61B$9.11B$1.42B
Net Income (TTM)$-2.60B$511M$1.97B$29M
Gross Margin-27.7%37.2%59.0%18.3%
Operating Margin-34.6%18.5%46.5%1.8%
Forward P/E31.5x48.3x30.6x76.4x
Total Debt$5.38B$1.31B$30.03B$180M
Cash & Equiv.$537M$371M$2.81B$561M

SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOSLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

SPR
CW
TDG
KTOS
StockMay 20Dec 25Return
Spirit AeroSystems … (SPR)100182.3+82.3%
Curtiss-Wright Corp… (CW)100562.6+462.6%
TransDigm Group Inc… (TDG)100320.2+220.2%
Kratos Defense & Se… (KTOS)100410.2+310.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TDG leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Curtiss-Wright Corporation is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. SPR and KTOS also each lead in at least one category. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
SPR
Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
The Defensive Choice

SPR is the clearest fit if your priority is stability.

  • Beta 0.67 vs KTOS's 1.84
Best for: stability
CW
Curtiss-Wright Corporation
The Long-Run Compounder

CW is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 8.2% 10Y total return vs KTOS's 12.3%
  • +100.0% vs TDG's -3.7%
  • 9.8% ROA vs SPR's -42.6%, ROIC 14.1% vs -50.9%
Best for: long-term compounding
TDG
TransDigm Group Incorporated
The Income Pick

TDG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 13.3%
  • Rev growth 11.2%, EPS growth 25.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.6%
  • PEG 0.98 vs CW's 2.22
  • Beta 0.79, yield 13.3%, current ratio 3.21x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
KTOS
Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

KTOS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.84, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.06x
  • 18.5% revenue growth vs SPR's 4.4%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthKTOS logoKTOS18.5% revenue growth vs SPR's 4.4%
ValueTDG logoTDGLower P/E (30.6x vs 76.4x)
Quality / MarginsTDG logoTDG21.6% margin vs SPR's -40.7%
Stability / SafetySPR logoSPRBeta 0.67 vs KTOS's 1.84
DividendsTDG logoTDG13.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs CW's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)CW logoCW+100.0% vs TDG's -3.7%
Efficiency (ROA)CW logoCW9.8% ROA vs SPR's -42.6%, ROIC 14.1% vs -50.9%

SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

SPRSpirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.
FY 2024
Commercial
78.0%$4.9B
Defense & Space
15.4%$975M
Aftermarket
6.6%$414M
CWCurtiss-Wright Corporation
FY 2025
Naval Defense
26.9%$942M
Aerospace Defense
19.2%$673M
Power & Process
18.2%$635M
Commercial Aerospace
12.3%$430M
General Industrial
11.8%$412M
Ground Defense
11.6%$407M
TDGTransDigm Group Incorporated
FY 2025
Power And Control
51.6%$4.6B
Airframe
46.6%$4.1B
Non-Aviation Related Business
1.8%$160M
KTOSKratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
65.2%$878M
Service
34.8%$469M

SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLCWLAGGINGKTOS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TDG is the larger business by revenue, generating $9.1B annually — 6.4x KTOS's $1.4B. TDG is the more profitable business, keeping 21.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPR's -40.7%. On growth, KTOS holds the edge at +22.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricSPR logoSPRSpirit AeroSystem…CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…TDG logoTDGTransDigm Group I…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$6.4B$3.6B$9.1B$1.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$2.0B$729M$4.6B$72M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$2.6B$511M$2.0B$29M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$803M$591M$1.9B-$133M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-27.7%+37.2%+59.0%+18.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-34.6%+18.5%+46.5%+1.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-40.7%+14.2%+21.6%+2.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-12.6%+16.4%+20.6%-9.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+7.8%+13.4%+13.9%+22.6%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-51.3%+29.1%-13.1%+133.3%
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 38.7x trailing earnings, TDG trades at a 91% valuation discount to KTOS's 438.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TDG offers better value at 1.24x vs CW's 2.58x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricSPR logoSPRSpirit AeroSystem…CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…TDG logoTDGTransDigm Group I…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …
Market CapShares × price$4.6B$26.7B$70.1B$10.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$9.5B$27.6B$97.4B$10.3B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.16x56.20x38.72x438.46x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.31.52x48.34x30.56x76.41x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.58x1.24x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple43.32x21.48x118.42x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.73x7.63x7.94x7.93x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share10.74x4.94x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF48.21x38.63x
TDG leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

CW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

CW delivers a 19.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $20 in annual profit, vs $1 for KTOS. KTOS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CW's 0.52x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CW scores 7/9 vs SPR's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricSPR logoSPRSpirit AeroSystem…CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…TDG logoTDGTransDigm Group I…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+19.6%+1.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-42.6%+9.8%+8.6%+1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital-50.9%+14.1%+20.9%+1.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-44.9%+16.6%+20.8%+1.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92764
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.52x0.09x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$4.8B$943M$27.2B-$381M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$537M$371M$2.8B$561M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$5.4B$1.3B$30.0B$180M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-5.57x15.90x2.55x6.16x
CW leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CW five years ago would be worth $54,902 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,973 for SPR. Over the past 12 months, CW leads with a +100.0% total return vs TDG's -3.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CW at 64.7% vs SPR's 17.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricSPR logoSPRSpirit AeroSystem…CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…TDG logoTDGTransDigm Group I…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+26.4%-8.6%-28.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+10.1%+100.0%-3.7%+58.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+61.2%+347.1%+86.7%+331.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-10.3%+449.0%+140.2%+110.3%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-11.1%+815.8%+595.3%+1231.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+17.2%+64.7%+23.1%+62.8%
CW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — SPR and CW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SPR is the less volatile stock with a 0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than KTOS's 1.84 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CW currently trades 96.4% from its 52-week high vs KTOS's 42.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricSPR logoSPRSpirit AeroSystem…CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…TDG logoTDGTransDigm Group I…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.68x1.24x0.79x1.87x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$42.33$750.00$1623.83$134.00
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$34.62$359.48$1123.61$32.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+93.3%+96.4%+76.5%+42.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10067.159.856.538.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.8M303K370K4.3M
Evenly matched — SPR and CW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — CW and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: SPR as "Hold", CW as "Buy", TDG as "Buy", KTOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.2% upside for KTOS (target: $110) vs 2.4% for CW (target: $741). For income investors, TDG offers the higher dividend yield at 13.32% vs CW's 0.13%.

MetricSPR logoSPRSpirit AeroSystem…CW logoCWCurtiss-Wright Co…TDG logoTDGTransDigm Group I…KTOS logoKTOSKratos Defense & …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.15$741.00$1568.30$109.58
# AnalystsCovering analysts43253924
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.1%+13.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0102
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.92$165.45
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.7%+0.7%0.0%
Evenly matched — CW and TDG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TDG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CW leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallCurtiss-Wright Corporation (CW)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

SPR vs CW vs TDG vs KTOS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is the stronger pick with 18. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 4% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (SPR). TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) offers the better valuation at 38. 7x trailing P/E (30. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) a "Buy" — based on 25 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS?

On trailing P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the cheapest at 38.

7x versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. at 438. 5x. On forward P/E, TransDigm Group Incorporated is actually cheaper at 30. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: TransDigm Group Incorporated wins at 0. 98x versus Curtiss-Wright Corporation's 2. 22x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS?

Over the past 5 years, Curtiss-Wright Corporation (CW) delivered a total return of +449.

0%, compared to -10. 3% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (SPR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: KTOS returned +1253% versus SPR's -11. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.

(SPR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 68β versus Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 87β — meaning KTOS is approximately 174% more volatile than SPR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 52% for Curtiss-Wright Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

(KTOS) is pulling ahead at 18. 5% versus 4. 4% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. (SPR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TransDigm Group Incorporated grew EPS 25. 2% year-over-year, compared to -208. 4% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TDG leads at 17. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS?

TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more profitable company, earning 23.

5% net margin versus -33. 9% for Spirit AeroSystems Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TDG leads at 47. 2% versus -28. 3% for SPR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TDG leads at 60. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Curtiss-Wright Corporation's 2. 22x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) trades at 30. 6x forward P/E versus 76. 4x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. — 45. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KTOS: 92. 2% to $109. 58.

08

Which pays a better dividend — SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS?

In this comparison, TDG (13.

3% yield), CW (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. SPR, KTOS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is SPR or CW or TDG or KTOS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, TransDigm Group Incorporated (TDG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

79), 13. 3% yield, +583. 3% 10Y return). Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS) carries a higher beta of 1. 87 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TDG: +583. 3%, KTOS: +1253%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between SPR and CW and TDG and KTOS?

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: SPR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; TDG is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; KTOS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. TDG pays a dividend while SPR, CW, KTOS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

SPR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CW

Steady Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TDG

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

KTOS

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform SPR and CW and TDG and KTOS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(SPR: 7.8% · CW: 13.4%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.