Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
SPWH vs DKS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
SPWH vs DKS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $55M | $20.60B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.21B | $17.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-37M | $849M |
| Gross Margin | 31.2% | 32.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.3% | 7.7% |
| Forward P/E | — | 15.9x |
| Total Debt | $455M | $4.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $1.69B |
SPWH vs DKS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sportsman's Warehou… (SPWH) | 100 | 12.8 | -87.2% |
| DICK'S Sporting Goo… (DKS) | 100 | 628.1 | +528.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: SPWH vs DKS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, SPWH is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
DKS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 11 yrs, beta 1.45, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 28.1%, EPS growth -29.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 11.7%
- 467.2% 10Y total return vs SPWH's -87.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 28.1% revenue growth vs SPWH's -7.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 4.9% margin vs SPWH's -3.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.45 vs SPWH's 1.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield; 11-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +24.1% vs SPWH's -14.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs SPWH's -3.9%, ROIC 0.0% vs -1.9% |
SPWH vs DKS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
SPWH vs DKS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DKS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.2B annually — 14.3x SPWH's $1.2B. DKS is the more profitable business, keeping 4.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPWH's -3.1%. On growth, DKS holds the edge at +59.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $17.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $24M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$37M | $849M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$55M | $399.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +31.2% | +32.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.3% | +7.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.1% | +4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.5% | +23.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +1.8% | +59.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -12.5% | -61.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DKS leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, DKS's 12.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SPWH's 22.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $55M | $20.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $507M | $23.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.64x | 22.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 15.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.93x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 22.79x | 12.87x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.05x | 1.20x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 0.00x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 2.80x | 0.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DKS leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DKS delivers a 0.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-18 for SPWH. DKS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SPWH's 1.93x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -17.9% | +0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.9% | +6.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.9% | +0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -3.2% | +0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.93x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $452M | $2.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $1.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $455M | $4.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.26x | 19.04x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DKS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in DKS five years ago would be worth $28,461 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $807 for SPWH. Over the past 12 months, DKS leads with a +24.1% total return vs SPWH's -14.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DKS at 19.4% vs SPWH's -38.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.1% | +13.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -14.9% | +24.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.0% | +70.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.9% | +184.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -87.2% | +467.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -38.7% | +19.4% |
Risk & Volatility
DKS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
DKS is the less volatile stock with a 1.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPWH's 1.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. DKS currently trades 95.4% from its 52-week high vs SPWH's 33.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.80x | 1.45x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.33 | $237.31 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.08 | $167.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +33.0% | +95.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 49.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 829K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
DKS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
DKS is the only dividend payer here at 2.15% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $251.43 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 63 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 11 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.86 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +1.7% |
DKS leads in 6 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics.
SPWH vs DKS: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is SPWH or DKS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger pick with 28. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) offers the better valuation at 22. 7x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) a "Buy" — based on 63 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — SPWH or DKS?
Over the past 5 years, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) delivered a total return of +184. 6%, compared to -91. 9% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DKS returned +467. 2% versus SPWH's -87. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — SPWH or DKS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 45β versus Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 80β — meaning SPWH is approximately 24% more volatile than DKS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc. (DKS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 193% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — SPWH or DKS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is pulling ahead at 28. 1% versus -7. 0% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -29. 0% for DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DKS leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — SPWH or DKS?
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the more profitable company, earning 49. 3% net margin versus -2. 8% for Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 49. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DKS leads at 7. 7% versus -1. 5% for SPWH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DKS leads at 32. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — SPWH or DKS?
In this comparison, DKS (2.
1% yield) pays a dividend. SPWH does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is SPWH or DKS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
(DKS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (2. 1% yield, +467. 2% 10Y return). Sportsman's Warehouse Holdings, Inc. (SPWH) carries a higher beta of 1. 80 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (DKS: +467. 2%, SPWH: -87. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between SPWH and DKS?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: SPWH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DKS is a mid-cap high-growth stock. DKS pays a dividend while SPWH does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.